Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate SLActive Implant Placement Thin vs. Thick Buccal Bone
Evaluation of the Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate SLActive Implant Placement in Thin vs. Thick Buccal Bone Plates: RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The utilization of SLActive implants which allow more rapid osseointgeration with 3 to 4 weeks. will be placed in thin buccal bone as immediate implants to determine the resorption compared to thick buccal bone
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedJanuary 23, 2024
January 1, 2024
4.5 years
January 25, 2021
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bucccal bone changes
standardized Cone beam computed Tomography The radiograph will be taken preoperatively and 12 month after. The pre and post operative cone beams will be compared to each other observing any changes of the buccal bone at 2 , 4 and 6 mm from the crest, the measurements will be in mm
12 months post loading
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Implant stability
3 months
Crestal bone changes
12 months post loading
Soft tissue thickness
3 months
Post operative pain and swelling
1 week
Buccal bone thickness
3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
thin buccal bone
ACTIVE COMPARATORthick buccal bone
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Minimally traumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement and hard tissue grafting. loading after 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Single bounded irrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone that needs to be extracted.
- Healthy systemic condition.
- Type I socket with a minimum of 1mm of buccal bone thickness prior to extraction. (Morton et al., 2014)
- Sufficient bone apical to the socket for implant primary stability. (Morton et al., 2014)
- Good oral hygiene.
- Patient accepts a minimum of three-year follow-up period (cooperative patients).
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al. 2006 and Roelhing et al. 2016).
- Smokers (Lambert et al. 2000).
- Pregnant females.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
- Institut Straumann AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
ElNahass H, Tawfik OK, Naiem SN, Zazou N, Moussa M. Evaluation of buccal bone resorption in immediate implant placement in thin versus thick buccal bone plates: An 18-month follow-up prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Jun;26(3):532-544. doi: 10.1111/cid.13312. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
PMID: 38380779DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assitant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2021
First Posted
February 1, 2021
Study Start
January 15, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
January 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01