Mechanochemical Ablation vs Thermal Ablation
1 other identifier
interventional
132
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Patients with GSV reflux were randomized to undergo either MOCA or thermal ablation with laser or radiofrequency. The main outcome measure was the occlusion rate of the GSV at one year.Patients with GSV reflux were randomized to undergo either MOCA or thermal ablation with laser or radiofrequency. The main outcome measure was the occlusion rate of the GSV at one and three years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedFebruary 10, 2021
October 1, 2018
6.9 years
October 23, 2018
February 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Occlusion rate
Occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein
One year after the treatment
Freedom from reflux
The absence of reflux in the treated great saphenous vein
One year after the treatment
Disease-specific quality of life
Quality of life as measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire
One year after the treatment
Occlusion rate
Occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein
three years after the treatment
Freedom from reflux
The absence of reflux in the treated great saphenous vein
three years after the treatment
Disease-specific quality of life
Quality of life as measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire
three years after the treatment
Occlusion rate
Occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein
five years after the treatment
Freedom from reflux
The absence of reflux in the treated great saphenous vein
five years after the treatment
Disease-specific quality of life
Quality of life as measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire
five years after the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Peroperative and immediate postoperative pain
During the procedure, immediately after, and at one week after the treatment
Sick leave
During the immediate postoperative period up to one month
Pain medication
During the immediate postoperative period up to one month
30-day occlusion rate
30 days after the treatment
Complications
Up to five years after the treatment
Study Arms (3)
MOCA
EXPERIMENTALThe refluxing GSV was treated with ClariVein catheter (endovenous mechanochemical ablation).
EVLA
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe refluxing GSV was treated with endovenous laser ablation.
RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe refluxing GSV was treated with radiofrequency ablation.
Interventions
Great saphenous vein occlusion with a mechanochemical chateter which cause mechanical injury to vessel intima and gives sclerosant to the intima.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical classification of venous disease C2-C4
- ultrasound-verified reflux in the GSV
- mean GSV diameter in the thigh between 5 and 12 millimetres
- informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- body mass index (BMI) of over 40
- peripheral arterial disease
- lymphoedema
- pregnancy
- allergy to either the sclerosant or lidocaine
- severe general illness
- malignancy
- previous deep venous thrombosis
- previous varicose vein intervention in the same leg
- coagulation disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Vahaaho S, Halmesmaki K, Mahmoud O, Alback A, Noronen K, Venermo M. Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing mechanochemical and thermal ablation in the treatment of insufficient great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 May;9(3):652-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
PMID: 32795619DERIVEDVahaaho S, Mahmoud O, Halmesmaki K, Alback A, Noronen K, Vikatmaa P, Aho P, Venermo M. Randomized clinical trial of mechanochemical and endovenous thermal ablation of great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2019 Apr;106(5):548-554. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11158.
PMID: 30908611DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Vascular Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2018
First Posted
October 26, 2018
Study Start
January 31, 2014
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
February 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2018-10