Obesity Group Visits. A Novel Way to Approach the Obesity Epidemic in an Inner-City Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study has two aims: Aim 1: To compare a medical group visit model versus a dietitian-let model (shared composite group visit approach vs individualized dietitian-led approach) to provide obesity care in a real-world diverse inner city population. Aim 2. To use both perivascular fat attenuation and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in those receiving composite group intervention vs. dietitian-led intervention to see if lifestyle intervention can reduce plaque progression and improve perivascular fat attenuation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2025
CompletedApril 15, 2025
April 1, 2025
5.9 years
January 11, 2021
April 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Weight
Weight will be measured at baseline and at 3,6, and 12 months.
Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Change in HbA1c
Hemoglobin A1c will be measured at baseline, and at moths 0, 3, 6 and 12 to determine the effect of the intervention arm.
Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Change in Healthy Eating Index-2015 Score
Diet quality will be assessed by the healthy eating Index-2015 score calculated from the food frequency questionnaire using the diet history questionnaire tool (DHQ) version III software. The minimum and maximum scores ranges fron 0 to 100. Higher scores greater than 60 indicate better diet quality.
Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Change in Physical Activity Measures
The IPAQ short form is a seven-item instrument evaluation tool of physical activity among the adults that measures a range of physical activity from vigorous to sedentary over the last 7 days. The specific type of activities assessed are walking, moderate intensity activities and vigorous intensity activities. All continuous scores are expressed in metabolic equivalent minutes(MET-minutes) per week with walking =3.3 METs, Moderate PA=4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. An overall total physical activity score can be computed as the sum of the total MET-minutes/week scores where more MET-minutes per week indicate more physical activity
Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Change in General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) Score
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) consists of 12-item rating scale for assessing psychological distress over the past few weeks. Scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress.
Baseline, months 3, 6 and 12.
Change in Social Determinants of Health Factors (SDOH, PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Addressing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences) tool.
Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up PRAPARE score. The PRAPARE assessment tool will be used to calculate a tally risk score indicating the cumulative number of SDOH risks a patient faces (including 15 SDOH domains).
Baseline and at month-12.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) score
Baseline and 12 months.
Study Arms (2)
Medical Group Visit
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive obesity management in a group setting let by endocrinologist and nutritionist.
Dietitian-Led Visit
EXPERIMENTALParticipant receives obesity management in an individual setting lead by registered dietitian.
Interventions
A group of 20 or more participants will receive obesity management through endocrinologist and registered dietitian in a group seetting.
Participant receives obesity management individually from a registered dietitian.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18
- BMI\< 30 kg/m2
- Unwilling to sing consent form
- Currently participating in another obesity treatment program
- Currently on a weight loss medication (orlistat, lorcaserin, and phentermine/topiramate-ER, phenetermine, diethylpropion, phendimetrazine and benzphetamine)
- Currently on metformin or topiramate primarily prescribed for weight loss
- Currently pregnant
- Ineligible to receive care at LAC-DHS
- Those with mental illness, substance abuse issues as well as other illnesses who are unable to follow directions related to the study or becomes disruptive to the overall group
- Patients who have had bariatric surgery less than a year from time of enrollment
- Females \<50 years of age and Males \<40 years of age are not eligible to participate in the sub-study that involves getting a Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan done at the Lundquist Institute.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science
Los Angeles, California, 90059, United States
Related Publications (5)
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
PMID: 24570244BACKGROUNDKnowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
PMID: 11832527BACKGROUNDRyan DH, Bray GA. Pharmacologic treatment options for obesity: what is old is new again. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):182-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0343-6.
PMID: 23625271BACKGROUNDCarvajal R, Wadden TA, Tsai AG, Peck K, Moran CH. Managing obesity in primary care practice: a narrative review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Apr;1281(1):191-206. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12004. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PMID: 23323827BACKGROUNDVadheim LM, Brewer KA, Kassner DR, Vanderwood KK, Hall TO, Butcher MK, Helgerson SD, Harwell TS. Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention program among persons at high risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in a rural community. J Rural Health. 2010 Summer;26(3):266-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00288.x.
PMID: 20633095BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theodore Friedman, MD. PhD
Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2021
First Posted
January 26, 2021
Study Start
February 3, 2020
Primary Completion
December 28, 2025
Study Completion
December 28, 2025
Last Updated
April 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- starting 6 months after publication.
- Access Criteria
- Contact Petra Duran and PI directly.
All IPD that underlie results in a publication.