Comparing AlloDerm and DermACELL in Breast Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study will compare 90-day complication rates between breasts reconstructed with tissue expanders and AlloDerm vs. DermACELL, with each patient serving as her own comparator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 26, 2022
CompletedAugust 4, 2022
August 1, 2022
9 months
December 29, 2020
August 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Drain time
Number of days between surgical placement of drains and time until drains are removed.
Up to 90 days
Drain output
Total amount of fluid collected by the drains until their removal (measured in cc).
Up to 90 days
Incidence of Seroma
Each patient will be evaluated for incidence of seroma in either breast at postoperative visits.
Up to 90 days
Incidence of Infection
Each patient will be evaluated for incidence of infection in either breast at postoperative visits.
Up to 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence of Skin necrosis
Up to 90 days
Incidence of Hematoma
Up to 90 days
Incidence of Device Explantation
Up to 90 days
Study Arms (2)
AlloDerm
ACTIVE COMPARATORAlloDerm will be surgically implanted into each participant (either in their left or right breast) at the time of their breast reconstruction surgery. AlloDERM will be placed in the breast opposite to the breast in which DermACELL is placed, so that the patient has AlloDERM in the right breast and DermACELL in the left breast, or vice versa.
DermACELL
ACTIVE COMPARATORDermACELL will be surgically implanted into each participant (either in their left or right breast) at the time of their breast reconstruction surgery. DermACELL will be placed in the breast opposite to the breast in which AlloDERM is placed, so that the patient has AlloDERM in the right breast and DermACELL in the left breast, or vice versa.
Interventions
Enrolled patients will have one of their breasts reconstructed with AlloDerm at the time of their breast reconstruction surgery.
Enrolled patients will have one of their breasts reconstructed with DermACELL at the time of their breast reconstruction surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients over the age of 18
- May be undergoing either therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy
- Must be undergoing bilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction with tissue expanders
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who wish to avoid the use of ADM in their reconstruction
- History of radiation of the breast
- Unilateral mastectomies
- Direct to implant breast reconstruction (not utilizing a tissue expander)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
DAVinci Plastic Surgery
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016, United States
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016, United States
Related Publications (3)
Zenn MR, Salzberg CA. A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction. Eplasty. 2016 Aug 11;16:e23. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27602176BACKGROUNDPittman TA, Fan KL, Knapp A, Frantz S, Spear SL. Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: The 50/50 Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar;139(3):521-528. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003048.
PMID: 28234811BACKGROUNDSteiner CA, Weiss AJ, Barrett ML, Fingar KR, Davis PH. Trends in Bilateral and Unilateral Mastectomies in Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Settings, 2005-2013. 2016 Feb [updated 2016 Mar]. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Statistical Brief #201. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK367629/
PMID: 27253008BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Davison, MD
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- At the time of surgery, the surgeon will be blinded to which acellular dermal matrix product he or she is utilizing in each breast, and the technical steps of the procedure will proceed identically on each side. This can be done through the help of circulators and scrub techs during the surgery, who can randomly prepare either AlloDerm or DermACELL to be placed in either the right or left breast, without informing the surgeon. Other items, like the selection of suture and number of drains placed will be at the discretion of the surgeon but will proceed identically in the two breasts. Patients will also be blinded as to what product is in each breast. On the day of surgery, the circulator/operating room assistants will record what product is placed in each breast in the surgery electronic medical note.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2020
First Posted
January 14, 2021
Study Start
October 21, 2021
Primary Completion
July 26, 2022
Study Completion
July 26, 2022
Last Updated
August 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share