Study Stopped
PI is no longer at institution. IRB closed study due to lack of response from PI
Comparison of FlexHD and Alloderm Outcomes in Breast Reconstructive Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
FlexHD and Alloderm are two common products used in breast reconstruction to hold tissue expanders and implants in place. There have been few chart review studies comparing outcomes between the two materials in breast reconstruction. These studies have determined there is no difference in complication rates between the two materials. However, there have never been any active studies to date. This study will serve as a randomized controlled trial comparing FlexHD and Alloderm. Several outcomes will be measured based off of inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine if either product is more suitable for use in breast reconstruction. This will be performed by randomly assigning patients to receive either FlexHD or Alloderm. Designated outcomes will be followed closely postoperatively. Outcomes will be statistically analyzed to determine complication rates between FlexHD and Alloderm and thus which product is better to use in breast reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2017
CompletedJuly 18, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.8 years
February 20, 2015
July 16, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound Dehiscence
time frame.
One Year
Study Arms (2)
FlexHD
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomly assigned to receive FlexHD for breast reconstruction.
Alloderm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomly assigned to receive Alloderm for breast reconstruction.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI\<30
- No Prior Breast Radiation
- No Prior Breast Reduction
- No Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM and non-IDDM)
- Non-smoker or quit \>6 weeks prior
- No breast implants or prior breast implants
- No inflammatory or autoimmune disorders
- No current anticoagulation therapy
- No current pregnant
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \> 30
- Prior Breast Radiation
- Diabetes Mellitus - IDDM and non IDDM
- Prior Breast Reduction
- Active Smoker or Recently Quit \<6 weeks
- Prior Breast Implants
- Inflammatory/Autoimmune Condition (ex. Lupus)
- Current Anticoagulation Therapy
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Related Publications (3)
Yuen JC, Yue CJ, Erickson SW, Cooper S, Boneti C, Henry-Tillman R, Klimberg S. Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Apr 7;2(3):e119. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000061. eCollection 2014 Mar.
PMID: 25289313BACKGROUNDLiu DZ, Mathes DW, Neligan PC, Said HK, Louie O. Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 May;72(5):503-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318268a87c.
PMID: 23636114BACKGROUNDBrooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, Michelotti B, Moyer K, Neves RI, Mackay D, Potochny J. Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):347-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d97.
PMID: 22868313BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pallavi A Kumbla, MD
UAMS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2015
First Posted
February 26, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 21, 2017
Study Completion
December 21, 2017
Last Updated
July 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share