Therapy of Pragmatic Disorders in Brain-damaged Individuals
Therapy of Non-literal Language Comprehension Disorders in Brain-damaged Individuals: Case Studies
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess speech therapy's effectiveness in understanding other people's thoughts (implied) using written stories. The main objective is to examine whether the therapy improves understanding of the stories worked on in the sessions. We also explore whether the observed progress is maintained one month after the end of treatment and whether it is generalized to neuropsychological tests, video material, and the participants' daily lives. This therapy will be administered to four individuals with brain lesions, for six weeks, at the rate of two weekly sessions of one hour.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedMay 18, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.4 years
January 7, 2021
May 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from the score on the written task of comprehension of non-literal language 48 hours after the end of the therapy
The non-literal language comprehension task includes written stories ending with a character's utterance that can be interpreted literally (e.g., "I'm mad at you" to signify her nervousness); ironically (e.g. "it was a fantastic play" to mean the play was bad); as an indirect request (e.g., "Caramels look good" to ask for a caramel); like a lie (e.g. "it was very nice"); like a faux-pas (e.g., criticizing a person without knowing that he or she hears everything). Following these stories, the participant must answer the question: "What does the character mean? ". Each story is scored 0-1-2 depending on the accuracy of the answer. The total score is thus obtained by adding the points received for each of the questions in the task's stories. The stories will be administered twice before the therapy (baselines) and directly (24-48 hours) after the last session of the therapy to analyze the change of performance.
Baselines, 24-48 hours after the last session of the therapy
Change from the score on the written task of comprehension of non-literal language 1 month after the end of the therapy
The non-literal language comprehension task includes written stories ending with a character's utterance that can be interpreted literally (e.g., "I'm mad at you" to signify her nervousness); ironically (e.g. "it was a fantastic play" to mean the play was bad); as an indirect request (e.g., "Caramels look good" to ask for a caramel); like a lie (e.g. "it was very nice"); like a faux-pas (e.g., criticizing a person without knowing that he or she hears everything). Following these stories, the participant must answer the question: "What does the character mean? ". Each story is scored 0-1-2 depending on the accuracy of the answer. The total score is thus obtained by adding the points received for each of the questions in the task's stories. The stories will be administered twice before the therapy (baselines) and one month after the last session of the therapy to analyze the long-term change of performance.
Baselines, 1 month-follow-up
Maintenance from the score on the written task of comprehension of non-literal language 1 month after the end of the therapy
The non-literal language comprehension task includes written stories ending with a character's utterance that can be interpreted literally (e.g., "I'm mad at you" to signify her nervousness); ironically (e.g. "it was a fantastic play" to mean the play was bad); as an indirect request (e.g., "Caramels look good" to ask for a caramel); like a lie (e.g. "it was very nice"); like a faux-pas (e.g., criticizing a person without knowing that he or she hears everything). Following these stories, the participant must answer the question: "What does the character mean? ". Each story is scored 0-1-2 depending on the accuracy of the answer. The total score is thus obtained by adding the points received for each of the questions in the task's stories. The stories will be administered 24-48 hours and one month after the last session of the therapy to analyze the maintenance of performance.
24-48 hours after the last session of the therapy, 1 month-follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Change from a nonverbal test of theory of mind 48 hours after the end of the therapy
Baselines, 24-48 hours after the last session of the therapy
Change from a nonverbal test of theory of mind 1 month after the end of the therapy
Baselines, 1 month-follow-up
Maintenance from a nonverbal test of theory of mind 1 month after the end of the therapy
24-48 hours after the last session of the therapy, 1 month-follow-up
Change from a verbal test of theory of mind 48 hours after the end of the therapy
Baselines, 24-48 hours after the last session of the therapy
Change from a verbal test of theory of mind 1 month after the end of the therapy
Baselines, 1 month-follow-up
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Brain-injured participants
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The intervention focuses on understanding the thoughts of the characters. Twenty written stories will be used, which end with statements that can be interpreted literally, ironically, as a lie, a request or a faux-pas (maladroitness). At the end of each story, the participant should explain what the characters want to mean by their statement. To help the participant in his understanding of the character's intention, he will be asked: 1\) To mention as many intentions as possible that can be associated with the target statement presented out of context (eg: "it's hot here" that can be interpreted literally, ironically, as a lie or a request) and to imagine contexts in connection with interpretation; 2. Analyze the relevant elements of the context (environment, the relationship between the characters, knowledge of the characters); 3. To judge the probability of the possible interpretations (pt 1) by justifying using the elements of the context analyzed previously (pt 2).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have been the victim, in adulthood, of a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or a stroke, with at least right frontal lesions (objectified by imaging). The time between the TBI or stroke and participation in this study should be greater than six months.
- Be of French mother tongue or have an excellent mastery of French.
- Be between 20 and 65 years old.
- Be right-handed
- Present problems in the understanding of non-literal language (irony, indirect requests), objectified by a neuropsychological examination.
You may not qualify if:
- Have a history of psychiatric disorder affecting social cognition (according to DSM-V criteria), and more specifically: autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, major depressive disorders, borderline personality disorders, generalized anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, phobia social and eating disorders (anorexia, bulimia).
- Have chronic symptoms of an alcohol or drug dependence disorder (according to DSM-V criteria).
- Have significant uncorrected vision and/or hearing problems.
- Have aphasia and/or significant reading and comprehension problems.
- Present significant spatial neglect.
- Present an impaired capacity for judgment and discernment, objectified by a neuropsychological evaluation.
- Have been the victim of several TBI or stroke
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Université de Neuchâtel
Neuchâtel, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2021
First Posted
January 14, 2021
Study Start
June 3, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2021
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
May 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05