NCT03514186

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial that assesses the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program (ICAP), specifically focusing on the variable of intensity. Half of the participants will receive 60 hours of intensive treatment over three weeks, while the other half will receive the same amount and type of comprehensive treatment distributed over 15 weeks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 17, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

April 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

AphasiaSpeech and Language TreatmentICAPIntensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Language Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R LQ)

    Includes a measure of auditory comprehension, oral expression, reading and written expression skills. Change from baseline to post-treatment and follow-up is reported.

    Change from pre-treatment to post-treatment (i.e. following completion of 60 hours of treatment at 3 weeks or 15 weeks depending on group assignment)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Language Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R LQ)

    Change from pre-treatment to 3 month follow-up

  • Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA)

    Change from pre-treatment to post-treatment (i.e. following completion of 60 hours of treatment at 3 weeks or 15 weeks depending on group assignment)

  • Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA)

    Change from pre-treatment to 3 month follow-up

  • The Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA)

    Change from pre-treatment to post-treatment (i.e. following completion of 60 hours of treatment at 3 weeks or 15 weeks depending on group assignment)

  • The Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA)

    Change from pre-treatment to 3 month follow-up

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program

EXPERIMENTAL

60 hours of comprehensive speech and language therapy applied intensively, 4 hours per day, 5 days a week for three weeks.

Behavioral: Speech and Language Therapy

Distributed Comprehensive Aphasia Tx

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

60 hours of comprehensive speech and language therapy distributed over 15 weeks (i.e. two 2-hour visits per week).

Behavioral: Speech and Language Therapy

Interventions

Includes: * one hour of individual therapy using a multimodality treatment called Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) that simultaneously targets semantics (word retrieval) and syntax (sentence construction); * one hour of constraint induced language therapy (CILT) where participants are paired and practice requesting and providing specific information using only spoken language; * one hour in the computer lab working on programs called Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA) and AphasiaScripts; and * one hour in a conversation group that emphasizes multimodality communication

Distributed Comprehensive Aphasia TxIntensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of an aphasia subsequent to a left-hemisphere infarct that is confirmed by CT scan or MRI
  • an Aphasia Quotient score on the Western Aphasia Battery of 20-85.
  • months post injury
  • premorbidly fluent in English
  • receiving no concomitant speech-language therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • diagnosis of Global aphasia
  • any other neurological condition (other than cerebral vascular disease) that could potentially affect cognition or speech, such as Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, or traumatic brain injury
  • any significant psychiatric history prior to the stroke, such as severe major depression or psychotic disorder requiring hospitalization (subjects with mood disorders who are currently stable on treatment will be considered)
  • active substance abuse.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AphasiaStrokeSpeech

Interventions

Speech Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech DisordersLanguage DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVerbal BehaviorCommunicationBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rehabilitation of Speech and Language DisordersRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Leora Cherney, PhD

    Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Because of the nature of the intervention, neither the treating SLPs nor the subjects can be masked regarding the scheduling of treatment. To minimize outcome ascertainment bias, an evaluator (testing speech-language pathologist) who is not directly associated with the daily activities of the trial and, therefore, blind to the treatment arm will administer and score all the assessments. Subjects will be introduced to the treatment arm to which they have been assigned with a script that emphasizes similar expectations from the intervention, regardless of the treatment group. This will reduce subject bias resulting from such beliefs that one of the therapies is less effective.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Both treatment arms will provide 60 hours of comprehensive aphasia therapy. In the ICAP arm, the 60 hours of treatment will be applied intensively, 4 hours per day, 5 days a week for three weeks. In the Distributed Treatment arm, the 60 hours of comprehensive treatment will be distributed over 15 weeks (i.e. two 2-hour visits per week).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Scientific Chair, Think & Speak Lab

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2018

First Posted

May 2, 2018

Study Start

July 15, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

June 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations