Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support
EQUIP
1 other identifier
interventional
896
7 countries
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this project is to test tools that will be part of a platform for training and supervision of mental health and psychosocial support helpers, including providers without specialized training in mental health. This platform, entitled Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support, is an online resource being developed to include: materials for evaluating core and specific competencies, training on core competencies, implementation guidance to conduct competency-based training. The Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support platform is designed to aid trainers and supervisors working with providers being trained to deliver World Health Organization and non-World Health Organization low-intensity psychological interventions. The research will address two study objectives: Objective 1. Determine feasibility, acceptability, and perceived utility of the Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support platform; Objective 2. Evaluate the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support competency assessment tools. To maximize generalizability of findings, Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support will be evaluated in seven countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Lebanon, Peru, Uganda, Zambia and Jordan. The sites are varied by types of psychological intervention, beneficiaries, experience of trainers, and background of trainees. In each site, trainers will train non-specialist providers on a low-intensity psychological intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedSeptember 28, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.5 years
July 29, 2020
September 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trainee - Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors; Unabbreviated scale title: "Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors"
15-item objective structured clinical examination using a role play, minimum value = 15, maximum value = 60, higher score means greater competency
Post-intensive supervision (approximately 1 month post-training)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Trainee - Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors; Unabbreviated scale title: "Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors"
immediately after the manualized psychological treatment training
Trainee - Trainer Subjective Rating of Competency; unabbrievated scale title "Trainer Subjective Rating of Competency"
immediately after the manualized psychological treatment training
Trainer's subjective competency rating of trainee on a scale from 1 to 4, with higher scores reflecting greater competency.
Post-intensive supervision (approximately 1 month post-training)
Trainee - Equip-Treatment-specific competencies; unabbreviated title "Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support Treatment Specific Competency"
Immediate post-training (last day of training on manualized intervention)
Trainee - Equip-Treatment-specific competencies; unabbreviated title "Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support Treatment Specific Competency"
Post-intensive supervision (approximately 1 month post-training)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Training and Supervision as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-specialists are trained in a psychological intervention under standard conditions. No feedback from competency-based evaluations is provided to modify the training or supervision curriculum.
Competency-based Training and Supervision
EXPERIMENTALNon-specialists are trained and supervised in a competency-based approach in which trainers and/or supervisors are provided with the competency scores of trainees in order to modify the training and supervision content and approach as needed.
Interventions
Trainees are evaluated with the Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors structured role play tool and the results are shared with trainers and/or supervisors to modify training based on strengths and weakness on the competency scores.
Trainees are trained using a manual for non-specialist-delivered psychological interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Trainees: Non-specialist in mental health and psychosocial support
- Clients: Site-specific level of distress to determine psychological intervention participation
You may not qualify if:
- Trainees: Unable to comprehend language that training and supervision will be conducted in
- Clients: Serious mental illness, developmental disability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- George Washington Universitylead
- World Health Organizationcollaborator
- The Center for Victims of Torture, United Statescollaborator
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
- University of Nairobicollaborator
- War Child Hollandcollaborator
- Socios En Salud Sucursal, Perucollaborator
- University of South Floridacollaborator
- HealthRight Internationalcollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambiacollaborator
- The University of New South Walescollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Center for Victims of Torture
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Institute for Family Health
Amman, Jordan
University of Nairobi
Nairobi, Kenya
War Child Holland
Beirut, Lebanon
Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru
Lince, 15046, Peru
HealthRight International Uganda
Kampala, Uganda
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alison Schafer, PhD
World Health Organization
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Trainees and their patients will not be told which arm the trainee was in. Outcome assessors will also be blinded to arm.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2020
First Posted
January 11, 2021
Study Start
June 20, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
September 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ICF
- Time Frame
- Individual participant data will be shared after completion of primary outcome publications from all sites.
- Access Criteria
- Contact principal investigator.
Individual participant data will be shared after completion of primary outcome publications from all sites.