Does the Length of Hospital Stay for Rehabilitation Affect Functional Outcomes in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
observational
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the length of hospital stay for rehabilitation affects functional outcomes of stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2021
CompletedJanuary 8, 2021
December 1, 2020
25 days
December 28, 2020
January 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical features and Functional Independence Measure instrument, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be then compared between the groups.
Demographic features, clinical features and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be documented for all patients. The FIM includes 18 items with higher scores indicating greater independence. The motor development of the upper extremity, hand, and lower extremity will be evaluated using the Brunnstrom test with higher stages indicating greater development. The degree of spasticity of the upper and lower extremity muscles will be assessed using the MAS with high stage indicating greater spasticity. All patients will be divided into two groups based on length of hospital stay. Clinical features, demographic features and FIM, MAS, and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be then compared between the groups. All data for normality were tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Mann-Whitney U tests will be used for comparison of the differences between the two groups.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Study Arms (1)
Based on the length of hospital stay
Based on the length of hospital stay, patients were divided into two groups: hospital stays ≤ 3 months (Group 1) and \> 3 months (Group 2).
Interventions
Based on the length of hospital stay, patients were divided into two groups: hospital stays ≤ 3 months (Group 1) and \> 3 months (Group 2).Clinical features and functional output will be then compared between the groups.
Eligibility Criteria
patients with a stroke who received rehabilitation in an inpatient clinic between 2010 and 2013
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke
- must be able to receive rehabilitation in an inpatient clinic between 2010 and 2013
You may not qualify if:
- previous history of stroke,
- other neurological diseases,
- amputation,
- severe arthritis
- undergoing hemodialysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kırklareli Univesity
Kırklareli, 39000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):547-54. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.547.
PMID: 3363586BACKGROUNDBalaban B, Tok F, Yavuz F, Yasar E, Alaca R. Early rehabilitation outcome in patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Jul 12;498(3):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 11.
PMID: 21600267BACKGROUNDHebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, Kirton A, Rumney PG, Bagg S, Bayley M, Dowlatshahi D, Dukelow S, Garnhum M, Glasser E, Halabi ML, Kang E, MacKay-Lyons M, Martino R, Rochette A, Rowe S, Salbach N, Semenko B, Stack B, Swinton L, Weber V, Mayer M, Verrilli S, DeVeber G, Andersen J, Barlow K, Cassidy C, Dilenge ME, Fehlings D, Hung R, Iruthayarajah J, Lenz L, Majnemer A, Purtzki J, Rafay M, Sonnenberg LK, Townley A, Janzen S, Foley N, Teasell R. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016 Jun;11(4):459-84. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643553. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PMID: 27079654BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
betül çiftçi tepeli
Kırklareli University School of Health Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitiation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation of Kırklareli University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2020
First Posted
January 8, 2021
Study Start
October 7, 2020
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share