The Effect of Preemptive APRV on Patients With High Risk for ARDS
The Effect of Preemptive Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Patients With High Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
65
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation that alternates between two levels of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support and allows spontaneous respiratory effort at either CPAP level. It is considered as an alternative, life-saving modality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that struggle for oxygenation. Compared to the classical ventilation, APRV has been shown to provide lower peak pressure, better oxygenation, less circulatory loss, and better gas exchange without deteriorating the hemodynamic condition of the ARDS patient. This mode is believed to help to achieve the target of opening consolidated lung areas (recruitment) and to prevent repeated opening-closing of alveoli (decruitment). However, there is still insufficient and limited proof to support this hypothesis. Recently, it has been proposed that early use of protective mechanical ventilation with APRV could be used preemptively to prevent development of ARDS in high risk patients. In that study, APRV prevented clinical and histological lung injury by protecting alveolar epithelial integrity, preserving surfactant and alveolar stability, and reducing pulmonary edema. The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate whether early use of APRV as a lung-protecting strategy was superior to the conventional methods in a patient population with high risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2021
CompletedJanuary 7, 2021
January 1, 2021
2.5 years
January 4, 2021
January 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
ARDS
Early use of APRV as a lung-protecting strategy was superior to the conventional methods in a patient population with high risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
2 year
P/F ratio
Affect of early using of APRV on P/F ratio, as a lung-protecting strategy was superior to the conventional methods in a patient population with high risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
2 year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mortality
2 year
Oxygenation
2 year
Airway pressures
2 year
Sedation requirements
2 year
inotrope requirements
2 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
P-SIMV+PS group
EXPERIMENTALThe reason behind using P-SIMV+PS as a conventional mode was that it is a pressure controlled mode like APRV.
APRV group
EXPERIMENTALAirway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation that alternates between two levels of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support and allows spontaneous respiratory effort at either CPAP level. It is considered as an alternative, life-saving modality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that struggle for oxygenation.
Interventions
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation that alternates between two levels of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support and allows spontaneous respiratory effort at either CPAP level. It is considered as an alternative, life-saving modality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that struggle for oxygenation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The study included patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation but was not initially diagnosed with ARDS 9, had a LIPS (Lung Injury Prediction Score) of \> 7, and have been staying in the ICU for more than 24 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- intracranial hypertension (suspected or confirmed by measurement with external ventricular drainage catheter)
- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or type II respiratory failure
- confirmed bronchopleural fistula
- documented barotrauma
- history of pneumonectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karadeniz Technical Universitylead
- Ondokuz Mayıs Universitycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük, MD
Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Intensivist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2021
First Posted
January 7, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share