Impact of Intra- and Postoperative Continuous Infusion of Lidocaine on Analgesia in Vascular Anaesthesia
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Single-centre Clinical Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative and Postoperative Continuous Lidocaine Infusion in High Cardiac Risk Vascular Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to test the effectiveness and safety of the use of lidocaine infusion in multimodal analgesic management. A group of patients undergoing vascular surgery performed with the classic technique on the aorta - with the opening of the abdominal cavity will be enrolled. The population of patients qualified for this type of vascular surgery is usually burdened with multiple diseases, mainly risk factors or cardiovascular diseases, which, combined with hemodynamic fluctuations, large fluid shifts (including bleeding) and stress for the body, affects the risk of serious cardiological complications, which in this group exceeds 5% and is the highest, according to the ESC / ESA (European Society of Cardiology / European Society of Anesthesiology) classification from 2014. Proper postoperative pain control is therefore becoming one of the key pillars of postoperative care in this group of patients. Due to the numerous disease burden of patients and the operational specifics, the use of multimodal therapy in the management of pain is of particular importance, as the use of high doses of opioids improves hemodynamic stability, but at the same time affects the occurrence of side effects - mainly excessive sedation, respiratory disorders, hypoventilation and, consequently, for hypoxia of the heart muscle. The risk of myocardial injury in non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is significant in the light of the available literature. Lidocaine used in intravenous infusion is one of the recommended components of multidirectional analgesia. Its adjuvant properties make it possible to reduce the amount of opioid drugs used, and thus - to reduce the frequency of their side effects. The high effectiveness of such a procedure has been proven in numerous experimental and epidemiological studies. Due to the low frequency of side effects associated with its use, the therapy has a strong recommendation for use in relieving perioperative pain. The analysis of the literature on the subject shows that there is little data assessing effectiveness of lidocaine infusion in relation to the group of patients after surgery on the abdominal aorta.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2022
CompletedDecember 21, 2022
December 1, 2022
3.3 years
December 21, 2020
December 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Opioid consumption in the intraoperative period
Dose of morphine (or fentanyl changed to the equivalent dose of morphine) administered to patient to achive pain score below 4 points (VAS scale)
Duration of general anaesthesia
Opioid consumption in the postoperative period
Dose of morphine administered to patient to achive pain score below 4 points (VAS scale)
First 24 hours after surgery
Consumption of the anesthetic agent
The Mean/median vaule of minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) necessary to maintain general anesthesia
Duration of general anesthesia
Hemodynamic stability
Comparison of systolic and mean blood pressure value to value (5 minutes interval, comparison of exceeding 10% of the previous value, total number of exceedances)
Duration of general anesthesia
Number of hemodynamic intervations
Total number hemodynamic interventions (total dose of vasoactive medication use according to study protocol)
Duration of general anesthesia
Intraoperative fulid therapy
Total amount and type of fluids, blood products administered to patient
Duration of general anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The Incidence of postoperative delirium
First 72 hours (after surgery), once per shift
Indicators of safety
Intraoperatively and first 24 hours (after surgery)
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORBefore induction bolus of 1% lidocaine 1,5mg/kg IBW i.v., continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine intraoperatively rate 2 mg/kg IBW i.v., continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine postoperatively rate 1 mg/kg IBW i.v. for 24 hours
Saline infusion
PLACEBO COMPARATORequal volumes of placebo - 0,9% saline i.v.
Interventions
bolus i.v. + continuous i.v. infusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Vascular surgery on aorta or iliac artery
- Proximal anasthomosis of a by-pass in the abdominal cavity
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications for administration of lidocaine (according to Summary Product Characteristics)
- Preoperative administration of any pain relief medication in patient, especially opioides (excluding pre-analgesia)
- Heart block second or third-degree, previous pacemaker implantation, chronic atrial fibrillation
- Antiarrhythmic medication on regular basis (excluding b-blockers prescribed due to coronary artery disease)
- Other health problems: chronic heart failure (ejection fraction LVEF\<30%), epilepsy or any episode of seizure, chronic renal failure (AKIN 3-5), chronic liver failure ( class B or C in the Child-Pugh classification), Myasthenia gravis, hypoproteinemia,
- Cognitive or mental dysfunction, that prevents proper cooperation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Łukasz Krzychlead
Study Sites (1)
Leszek Giec Upper-Silesia Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Katowice, 40-635, Poland
Related Publications (1)
Gajniak D, Mendrala K, Konig-Widuch G, Parzonka S, Gierek D, Krzych LJ. Effect of lidocaine on intraoperative blood pressure variability in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 7;24(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02550-5.
PMID: 38714924DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Łukasz J Krzych, Professor
Medical University of Silesia, Katowice
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2020
First Posted
December 31, 2020
Study Start
January 29, 2019
Primary Completion
June 3, 2022
Study Completion
July 2, 2022
Last Updated
December 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12