Efficacy of Rectal Sheath Analgesia After Midline Laparotomy
Rektus-puu
1 other identifier
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Midline laparotomy is commonly used in emergency and elective cancer surgery and patients need effective and safe pain treatment after this type of surgery. Nowadays modern anticoagulant therapy may prevent use of central regional blocks in pain management. Therefore in the present study the efficacy and safety of rectus sheath analgesia is studied using different administration techniques. The primary aim is the efficacy of the rectus sheath analgesia measured with pain ratings and the amount rescue opioid used. Secondary aims were concentrations of local anesthetic, rescue opioid and satisfaction to analgesia method used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 surgery
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4 surgery
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 27, 2023
August 1, 2020
6.5 years
August 12, 2016
October 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of rescue analgesic used for pain relief
From onset of rectus sheath analgesia
Time 0 h up to 48 h postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Maximum levobupivacaine plasma concentration
Time 0 h to 48 h postoperatively
maximum rescue analgesic concentration
time 0 h to 48 h postoperatively
Study Arms (4)
Continuous rectus sheath analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthetic continuous infusion with infusion pumps
Bolus rectus sheath analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORBolus administration of local anesthetic
Single dose rectus sheath analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORsingle dose administration of local anesthetic
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORno rectus sheath analgesia
Interventions
Levobupivacaine continuous infusion to rectus sheath catheters
Levobupivacaine bolus dosing to rectus sheath catheters
Levobupivacaine single dose to rectus sheath catheters
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- not pregnancy/adequate contraception
- no contraindications to the local anaesthetic No contraindications to opioid patient controlled analgesia
- Informed consent obtained
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \>35 kg / m2
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Contraindication to local anaesthetics
- Contraindication to opioids
- Not able to use patient controlled analgesia pump
- Relaparotomy
- No informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kuopio University Hospitallead
- Admescope Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Northern Savonia, 70029, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Matti Eskelinen, Professor
Kuopio University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2016
First Posted
August 17, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share