NCT04691479

Brief Summary

A multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.The control group followed the usual treatment, while the intervention group (PIMA) followed the treatment with an adapted and flexible care plan depending on socio-demographic, clinical and psychological variables. The treatment plan includes different channels (home, telephone, care center), a continuous evaluation, and the use of the motivational interview in each of the interventions with the patient. The main outcome was adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional state, activities, social relationships, perceived competence and motivation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
129

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 10, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 11, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 20, 2018

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 31, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 29, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

CPAPSleep ApneaAdherenceQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Adherence (changes)

    Number of hours of use of CPAP per night

    Day 90, Day 180

  • Somnolence (changes)

    Residual sleepiness after use of CPAP. Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Minimum score: 0; Maximum: 24. Higher scores=worse outcome

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

  • Perceived Competence (changes)

    Self-Efficacy in the CPAP treatment. Perceived Competence Evaluation Questionnaire. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score 13. Higher score= Better outcome.

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quality of Life (Changes)

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

  • Mood (Changes)

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

  • Activities (Changes)

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

  • Social Relations (Changes)

    Day 1, Day 90, Day 180

Study Arms (2)

PIMAGroup

EXPERIMENTAL

1. Educational and training program using motivational interview technical. 2. Stratification labels: to determine the personalized intervention plan are obtained from two types of variables: personal and modulation variables. For psychological variables the Perceived Competence Evaluation Questionnaire validated in Adherence to CPAP in OSA (CEPCA) is used. Drowsiness is obtained through the administration of the Epworth Somnolence Test, and the apnoea-hypopnea index is taken from the patient's clinical history. 3. Segmentation: With the psychological and clinical variables, in this first visit, "predictive" information is obtained on how the patient's adherence will be: high adherence, moderate adherence or low adherence. 4. Taking this information into account, the care plan will start considering how the patient is and their situation with respect to adherence. Depending on their evolution, the care plan is adapted. For patients with low adherence, telemonitoring is used.

Behavioral: Motivational Interview (MI) & Adherence Follow-Up

Control

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients followed the standard of care, which consists of starting therapy in the hospital, where the nurse performed training in the use of CPAP equipment, mask adjustment, and safety and maintenance instructions. For follow-up, the patient was always referred to the Hospital, with a frequency established by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (Day 30, Day 90 and Day 180). The follow-up procedure consisted of reviewing the CPAP hour meter and resolving any incidents that may have arisen, with the necessary corrective actions (change of mask, positive reinforcement, and explanation of specific aspects).

Behavioral: Adherence Follow-Up

Interventions

1. MEntA: Educational \& Training Program 2. Stratification: Identification of Personal Variables (Age, Level of study, Work status, preference of care attention, digital behaviour) 3. Adherence evaluation: Evaluation of Perceived Competence, Quality of Life, Mood, Activities, Social relations and Social Support 4. Identification of Care plan and Schedule next visits 5. Follow-up D30-D60-D90-D180 depending of the care plan, through the channel that belong for each care plan

PIMAGroup

The nurse takes the compliance of the CPAP device, and ask to the patient if he had some problems.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Diagnosis of OSA confirmed by sleep studies with polygraphy (PS) and / or polysomnography (PSG)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with obesity-related hypoventilation
  • Severe COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
  • Cognitive disorders and those unable to understand the consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

David Rudilla

Madrid, 28020, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep Apnea Syndromes

Interventions

Motivational Interviewing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ApneaRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingCounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Pedro Landete, PhD

    Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
After confirming their participation in the study, the patient was randomly assigned to one group or another, receiving the treatment as established in the protocol according to group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2020

First Posted

December 31, 2020

Study Start

March 10, 2018

Primary Completion

September 11, 2018

Study Completion

November 20, 2018

Last Updated

December 31, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Publication of results in two phases: * National Congress in Portugal * Publication in Research Journal

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
At the moment we are presenting the results in a journal for publication. The data may be requested from any of the researchers, and may be consulted online, the data being 100% anomized. Data accessibility will be in the next 36 months after publication.
Access Criteria
Researchers and reviewers

Locations