Adherence and Quality of Life of CPAP for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
PIMA1-JO-PR
2 other identifiers
interventional
129
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.The control group followed the usual treatment, while the intervention group (PIMA) followed the treatment with an adapted and flexible care plan depending on socio-demographic, clinical and psychological variables. The treatment plan includes different channels (home, telephone, care center), a continuous evaluation, and the use of the motivational interview in each of the interventions with the patient. The main outcome was adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional state, activities, social relationships, perceived competence and motivation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2020
CompletedDecember 31, 2020
December 1, 2020
6 months
December 21, 2020
December 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Adherence (changes)
Number of hours of use of CPAP per night
Day 90, Day 180
Somnolence (changes)
Residual sleepiness after use of CPAP. Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Minimum score: 0; Maximum: 24. Higher scores=worse outcome
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Perceived Competence (changes)
Self-Efficacy in the CPAP treatment. Perceived Competence Evaluation Questionnaire. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score 13. Higher score= Better outcome.
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quality of Life (Changes)
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Mood (Changes)
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Activities (Changes)
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Social Relations (Changes)
Day 1, Day 90, Day 180
Study Arms (2)
PIMAGroup
EXPERIMENTAL1. Educational and training program using motivational interview technical. 2. Stratification labels: to determine the personalized intervention plan are obtained from two types of variables: personal and modulation variables. For psychological variables the Perceived Competence Evaluation Questionnaire validated in Adherence to CPAP in OSA (CEPCA) is used. Drowsiness is obtained through the administration of the Epworth Somnolence Test, and the apnoea-hypopnea index is taken from the patient's clinical history. 3. Segmentation: With the psychological and clinical variables, in this first visit, "predictive" information is obtained on how the patient's adherence will be: high adherence, moderate adherence or low adherence. 4. Taking this information into account, the care plan will start considering how the patient is and their situation with respect to adherence. Depending on their evolution, the care plan is adapted. For patients with low adherence, telemonitoring is used.
Control
EXPERIMENTALThe patients followed the standard of care, which consists of starting therapy in the hospital, where the nurse performed training in the use of CPAP equipment, mask adjustment, and safety and maintenance instructions. For follow-up, the patient was always referred to the Hospital, with a frequency established by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (Day 30, Day 90 and Day 180). The follow-up procedure consisted of reviewing the CPAP hour meter and resolving any incidents that may have arisen, with the necessary corrective actions (change of mask, positive reinforcement, and explanation of specific aspects).
Interventions
1. MEntA: Educational \& Training Program 2. Stratification: Identification of Personal Variables (Age, Level of study, Work status, preference of care attention, digital behaviour) 3. Adherence evaluation: Evaluation of Perceived Competence, Quality of Life, Mood, Activities, Social relations and Social Support 4. Identification of Care plan and Schedule next visits 5. Follow-up D30-D60-D90-D180 depending of the care plan, through the channel that belong for each care plan
The nurse takes the compliance of the CPAP device, and ask to the patient if he had some problems.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older than 18 years
- Diagnosis of OSA confirmed by sleep studies with polygraphy (PS) and / or polysomnography (PSG)
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with obesity-related hypoventilation
- Severe COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Cognitive disorders and those unable to understand the consent to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
David Rudilla
Madrid, 28020, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pedro Landete, PhD
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- After confirming their participation in the study, the patient was randomly assigned to one group or another, receiving the treatment as established in the protocol according to group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2020
First Posted
December 31, 2020
Study Start
March 10, 2018
Primary Completion
September 11, 2018
Study Completion
November 20, 2018
Last Updated
December 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- At the moment we are presenting the results in a journal for publication. The data may be requested from any of the researchers, and may be consulted online, the data being 100% anomized. Data accessibility will be in the next 36 months after publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers and reviewers
Publication of results in two phases: * National Congress in Portugal * Publication in Research Journal