Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Flow Cytometry in Excluding Bacteruria
1 other identifier
observational
966
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A more rapid test for bacteriuria is desired. This will exclude the patients not having bacteriuria, which will contribute to a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care urine flow cytometry on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 14, 2022
September 1, 2022
12 months
December 22, 2020
September 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bacteriuria
The urine culture analysis combined with microbiologist assessment will be used as reference standard for bacteriuria. Diagnostic accuracy will be conducted, and Youden index analysis will be used to estimate the best cut-off
urine collected within 4 hours of arrival to emergency department and analysed within one week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Verified infectious diagnosis by expert panel
2 months after discharge
Other Outcomes (8)
Intensive care unit treatment
within 60 days from admission to emergency department
Length of stay
within 60 days from admission to emergency department
The number of participants who died within 30 days
within 30 days from arrival day
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Suspected infection
All patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected infections assessed by the receiving physician
Interventions
Diagnostic test of urine flow cytometry. A urine sample will be collected according to routine procedure by a study assistant. The sample will be divided into two aliquots; half for routine urine culturing, and half for Point-of-care Urine Flow cytometry (POC-UFC) analysis (UF-5000, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The analysis will be performed according to manufacturer's instruction and conducted by laboratory staff. Laboratory staff will be blinded to the participants diagnosis and outcome. The results of the POC-UFC analysis will not be visible to the treating physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Acutely admitted patients with suspected infections from three emergency departments (EDs) in the Region of Southern Denmark (Hospital Sønderjylland, Hospital Lillebælt, Odense University Hospital)
You may qualify if:
- Suspicion of acute infections assessed by the receiving physician at the emergency department
You may not qualify if:
- If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
- Admission within the last 14 days
- Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
- Pregnant women
- Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 \<200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (\>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for \>14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of Southern Jutland
Aabenraa, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Koves B, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Pickard R, Seisen T, Lam TB, Yuan CY, Bruyere F, Wagenlehner F, Bartoletti R, Geerlings SE, Pilatz A, Pradere B, Hofmann F, Bonkat G, Wullt B. Benefits and Harms of Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology Urological Infection Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):865-868. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
PMID: 28754533BACKGROUNDHerraez O, Asencio MA, Carranza R, Jarabo MM, Huertas M, Redondo O, Arias-Arias A, Jimenez-Alvarez S, Solis S, Zamarron P, Illescas MS, Galan MA. Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer to screen urinary tract infections: the URISCAM multicentre study. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;66(3):175-181. doi: 10.1111/lam.12832. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
PMID: 29223137BACKGROUNDSkjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606.
PMID: 34593497DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Christian Backer Mogensen
Hospital of Southern Jutland
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2020
First Posted
December 28, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 28, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share