Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Putty Compared to Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
PARTNER
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study to Assess the Performance of MagnetOs Putty Compared to Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing up to Three-level Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion (PLF).
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a phase IV post-marketing study for MagnetOs Putty. MagnetOs Putty is a synthetic bone graft extender product that is routinely used by surgeons as a treatment for patients with leg pain and/or back pain and undergoing spinal fusion surgery. In this study, MagnetOs Putty will be used according to the latest U.S. Instructions For Use, specifically as a bone graft extender mixed with autograft in a 1:1 vol.% in the posterolateral spine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 2, 2023
CompletedFebruary 13, 2024
February 1, 2024
2 years
December 18, 2020
February 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan
The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan at Month 12. Radiographic as determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between the superior and inferior transverse processes.
Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Radiographic Fusion by Plain Radiographs
Week 2, Week 6, Month 3
Posterolateral lumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan
Month 6
Interbody lumbar fusion assessed by plain radiographs
Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Functional Outcome by Oswestry Disability Index
Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, and 12
General, back and Leg Pain by Visual Analog Pain Scale
Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, and 12
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Events
12 Months
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Serious Adverse Events
12 Months
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Device Effects
12 Months
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MagnetOs Putty
EXPERIMENTALMagnetOs Putty use in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 7cc-10cc mixed with autograft bone in a 1:1 ratio per spine level at the randomized assigned side.
Local autograft
OTHERInterventions
Procedure: Instrumented posterolateral spine fusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is able to read/be read, understand, and provide written informed consent and has signed the Investigational Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent.
- Male or female patient ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients with leg pain and/or back pain requiring up to three-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion (L2 - S1).
- Failed conservative treatment (physical therapy, bed rest, medications, spinal injections, manipulations, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) for a minimum period of 3 months prior to study enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Requires \> three-level fusion or expected to need secondary intervention within one year following surgery.
- To treat conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable.
- In conditions where the surgical site may be subjected to excessive impact or stresses, including those beyond the load strength of fixation hardware (e.g. defect site stabilization is not possible).
- In case of significant vascular impairment proximal to the graft site.
- In case of severe metabolic or systemic bone disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta or Paget's Disease) that affect bone or wound healing.
- In case of acute and chronic infections in the operated area (soft tissue infections; inflammation, bacterial bone diseases; osteomyelitis).
- When intraoperative soft tissue coverage is not planned or possible.
- Undergoing any procedure that allows MagnetOs to come in direct contact with the articular space.
- Receiving treatment with medication interfering with calcium metabolism.
- Women who are or intend to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kuros Biosurgery AGlead
- Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentuckycollaborator
- Simplified Clinical Data Systems, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky
Paducah, Kentucky, 42001, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pascal Longlade, MD
Kuros BioSciences B.V.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2020
First Posted
December 22, 2020
Study Start
August 13, 2021
Primary Completion
August 2, 2023
Study Completion
December 2, 2023
Last Updated
February 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share