Chk2 Inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE Phase IA Trial)
CREATIVE
A Phase I, Open-label, Dose-finding Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of PHI-101 in Patients With Platinum-Resistance/Refractory Ovarian Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 in patients with platinum-resistance/refractory ovarian, fallopian tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. This study also evaluates the pharmacokinetics of PHI-101 and efficacy of PHI-101 during treating platinum-resistance/refractory ovarian, fallopian tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. PHI-101 is a CHK2 inhibitor that is a checkpoint kinase binding specifically to CHK2, rather than CHK1, and it inhibits the DDR system by inhibiting the ATM-CHK2 pathway, which is activated in response to DSBs. When a high-grade serous ovarian (HGSO) cancer cell line and various ovarian cancer cell lines (CAOV3, OVCAR3, SK-OV-03, and SW626) were treated with PHI-101 in a non-clinical study, the therapeutic effect of PHI-101 against ovarian cancer was demonstrated by a decrease in viability of ovarian cancer cells. In addition, a stronger growth inhibition effect was observed compared to that of treatment with olaparib or rucaparib alone, and a much stronger inhibition effect was observed when concomitantly used with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan. Based on the aforementioned results of the non-clinical studies, the potential of PHI-101 as a new treatment or concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapeutics for patients with ovarian cancer who are resistant to existing antineoplastic drugs was confirmed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJune 26, 2023
June 1, 2023
3 years
November 29, 2020
June 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)
The frequency and percentage of DLT that occurs during 1 cycle (28 days) after administration of the IP will be presented by the cohort.
Subjects will be treated and observed for DLT through the end of the first cycle (Days 1-28)
Maximum tolerated dose
The dose of PHI-101 will be escalated until an MTD is determined, and if the MTD is not determined at the MPD, dose escalation will be ended at that dose
Through the first cycle (Day1-28)
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Dose interruption (temporary discontinuation) percent (%)
Through the first cycle (Day1-28)
Dose reduction percent (%)
Through the first cycle (Day1-28)
Dose termination (permanent discontinuation) percent (%)
Through the first cycle (Day1-28)
Cmax
Cycle1Day1, Cycle1Day8, Cycle1Day15, Cycle2Day1, Cycle3Day1, Cycle6day1, and then, every 12 weeks until end of the study, up until 24 months (each cycle is 28 days)
AUCt
Cycle1Day1, Cycle1Day8, Cycle1Day15, Cycle2Day1, Cycle3Day1, Cycle6day1, and then, every 12 weeks until end of the study, up until 24 months (each cycle is 28 days)
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Cohort 1 (PHI-101 40mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn the starting dose cohort 1 subject will be administered 40mg/day PHI-101 and will be assessed for DLT ('single subject cohort'), and until an ADR ≥ \[CTCAE version 5.0\] grade 2 occurs, higher doses will be explored in single subject cohorts in a stepwise fashion. If an ADR ≥ \[CTCAE version 5.0\] grade 2 occurs, the accelerated 3+3 design will be immediately switched to the standard 3+3 scheme.
Cohort 2 (PHI-101 80mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn cohort 2, the subject will be administered 80mg/day PHI-101.
Cohort 3 (PHI-101 120mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn cohort 3, the subject will be administered 120mg/day PHI-101.
Cohort 4 (PHI-101 160mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn cohort 4, the subject will be administered 160mg/day PHI-101.
Cohort 5 (PHI-101 200mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn cohort 5, the subject will be administered 200mg/day PHI-101.
Cohort 6 (PHI-101 240mg/day)
EXPERIMENTALIn cohort 6, the subject will be administered 240mg/day PHI-101.
Interventions
Escalated doses of PHI-101 will be administered to each cohort.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females aged ≥ 19 years at the time of informed consent
- Pregnancy (childbearing potential and planning a pregnancy) and breast-feeding status ① Women of non-childbearing potential, women who are not pregnant or breast-feeding, or women who are not planning a pregnancy during the study
- ② Women of childbearing potential (Section 10.3.2.7.1) who have a confirmed negative pregnancy test at screening and immediately before administration of PHI-101 and agree to use an effective contraceptive method(s) (Section 10.3.2.7.2) required in this protocol for 6 months (24 weeks) from the last dose of PHI-101
- Indication
- ① Histologically or cytologically confirmed ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal cancer
- ② Epithelial malignant tumors diagnosed through local histopathological findings \[WHO Histological Classification, 2014\]
- : except LGSC, mucinous carcinoma of the ovary, MMMT, and LAP, which are classified as LCOH, \[NCCN Guideline version 2.2019\].
- LAP = low malignant potential (ovarian borderline epithelial tumor); LCOH = less common ovarian histopathology; LGSC = low-grade serous carcinoma; MMMT = malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (carcinosarcoma); NCCN Guideline = National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline; WHO Histological Classification = World Health Organization Histological Classification ③ Platinum-refractory cancer\* or platinum-resistance cancer†
- Disease progression during platinum-based antineoplastic therapy, † Disease progression within 6 months (24 weeks) from completion of platinum-based antineoplastic therapy ④ Inoperable subjects who are refractory to, cannot receive, or refuse standard of care, which is currently known to be clinically beneficial ⑤ Subjects with ≥ 1 measurable lesion or nonmeasurable, but evaluable lesion that meets \[RECIST version 1.1\] RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
- Expected life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
- \[ECOG PS\] ≤ 1 ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
- Subjects who have adequate hepatic, renal, and hematological function confirmed by the following laboratory tests (a re-test will be allowed during the screening period) ANC ≥ 1,500/mm3 (without administration of G-CSF within 2 weeks prior to baseline) Hb ≥ 10.0 g/dL (without transfusion within 2 weeks prior to baseline) Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm3 (without transfusion within 2 weeks prior to baseline) Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN AST and ALT ≤ 3.0 x ULN\* (≤ 5 x ULN for patients with liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma) Serum creatinine (or CrCl) Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min (by Cockcroft-Gault equation)
- Prior antineoplastic therapy and treatment ① Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy ≤ 5 times
- ② Reversible side effects from prior antineoplastic therapy (operation, drug, radiation therapy, etc.)\* resolved to \[CTCAE version 5.0\] grade 1 or better
- \* Subjects should not have had major surgery, antineoplastic therapy or experimental therapy, or direct radiation therapy on hematopoietic site within 4 weeks prior to baseline and should not be administered nitrosoureas or mitomycin-C within 6 weeks prior to baseline.
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- \) Subjects with known or suspected hypersensitivity or intolerance to the active ingredient or excipients of PHI-101 2) Subjects considered ineligible or unable to participate in this study according to the investigator's judgement for other reasons
- Medical history or current medical condition and disease 3) Subjects with the following cardiac insufficiency or cardiovascular disease (but not limited to):
- Evidence of myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction within 12 weeks prior to baseline
- \[NYHA Functional Classification\] ≥ II NYHA = New York Heart Association ③ LVEF \< 50% confirmed by ECHO or MUGA scan LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; ECHO = echocardiography; MUGA = Multi-gated acquisition blood pool scintigraphy
- Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia that is uncontrolled by the adequate and optimal treatments
- ⑤ Corrected QT (QTc)\* interval \> 450 msec (for both men and women) or long QT syndrome (or family history)
- \* QT interval (QTcF) corrected using Fridericia's formula will be used. In case of bundle branch block, the Bazett's formula will be used (QTcB).
- \) Subjects with the following gastrointestinal diseases that affect intake or absorption of the drug (but not limited to):
- Dysphagia
- Paralysis of intestine and intestinal obstruction
- ③ Gastrointestinal surgery that has a clinically significant effect on absorption of the drug: gastrotomy, small intestinal fistula, extensive small bowel resection, etc. (except for simple anastomosis)
- ④ Autoimmune or inflammatory disease that involves the entire gastrointestinal system or small intestines: coeliac disease, intestinal graft versus host disease, Behcet's syndrome, scleroderma involving the gastrointestinal tract, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, etc.
- \) Lung diseases (but not limited to):
- New or progressive dyspnea, cough, and fever
- ② Planned diagnosis of interstitial lung disease, or interstitial pneumonia
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospitallead
- Pharos iBio Co., Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (9)
Suh DH, Chang SJ, Song T, Lee S, Kang WD, Lee SJ, Roh JW, Joo WD, Yoon JH, Jeong DH, Kim HS, Lee SJ, Ji YI, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Kim JW, Bae DS. Practice guidelines for management of ovarian cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;29(4):e56. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e56. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
PMID: 29770626BACKGROUNDStover EH, Konstantinopoulos PA, Matulonis UA, Swisher EM. Biomarkers of Response and Resistance to DNA Repair Targeted Therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5651-5660. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0247. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
PMID: 27678458BACKGROUNDGadducci A, Guarneri V, Peccatori FA, Ronzino G, Scandurra G, Zamagni C, Zola P, Salutari V. Current strategies for the targeted treatment of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer and relevance of BRCA mutational status. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jan 28;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0484-6.
PMID: 30691488BACKGROUNDScambia G, Ferrandina G. A turning point in the fight against ovarian cancer? Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):154-156. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30005-6. Epub 2018 Jan 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 29361471BACKGROUNDObeidat B, Latimer J, Crawford R. Can optimal primary cytoreduction be predicted in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer? Role of preoperative serum CA-125 level. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;57(3):153-6. doi: 10.1159/000076236. Epub 2004 Jan 15.
PMID: 14726621BACKGROUNDSmith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2010;108:73-112. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0.
PMID: 21034966BACKGROUNDJung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2016. Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;51(2):417-430. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.138. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30913865BACKGROUNDMcGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, Clarke-Pearson DL, Davidson M. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 4;334(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601043340101.
PMID: 7494563BACKGROUNDPark SJ, Chang SJ, Suh DH, Kong TW, Song H, Kim TH, Kim JW, Kim HS, Lee SJ. A phase IA dose-escalation study of PHI-101, a new checkpoint kinase 2 inhibitor, for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09138-z.
PMID: 34980026DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hee Seung Kim, MD
Seoul National University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2020
First Posted
December 21, 2020
Study Start
December 17, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
June 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share