NCT04673916

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of clobetasol propionate 0.05% oral gel versus an anti-inflammatory mouthwash in an oral solution for the management of patients suffering from symptomatic OLP. The secondary objective was to analyze which one of the two treatments induced a greater risk of developing side effects.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 25, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Mucosal healing

    Patients clinically were evaluated using the scale used by Thongprasom et al. as reference. This gives a score that varies from 0 to 5, using a millimetre reference: 0, in the absence of lesions; 1, in the presence of hyperkeratosis streaks; 2, in the presence of an atrophic area less than 1 mm2; 3, in the presence of an atrophic area greater than 1 mm2; 4, in the presence of an erosive area less than 1 mm2; 5, in the presence of an erosive area greater than 1 mm2. In the presence of multiple injuries, the value has been calculated by summing the values of each injury.

    180 days

Study Arms (2)

Clobetasol treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The clobetasol group was treated with clobetasol propionate 0.05%, while the anti-inflammatory group was treated with mouthwash. The drug used consisted of Clobetasol propionate 0.05%, Ethyl alcohol 96° (50%), Hydroxyethylcellulose (4%); Preserved water (just enough to 100%) that was topically applied \[11\]. This drug was produced as a galenic formulation. Clobetasol propionate twice a day (every 12 hours) to the lesions with a soft bristle brush and were advised not to drink or eat during the hour following application of the medication.

Drug: Healing evaluation

Anti-inflammatory mouthwash

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In patients of the anti-inflammatory group, the mouthwash was used pure and without dilution at a dosage of 20 ml 3 times a day, immediately after normal daily oral hygiene was prescribed. It contains calcium hydroxide, hyaluronic acid, Umbelliferone and Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins. Patients were instructed to rinse for at least 5 minutes over the entire oral mucosa, with particular emphasis on the regions where the lesions are located.

Drug: Healing evaluation

Interventions

Treatments were topically applied for 5 days

Anti-inflammatory mouthwashClobetasol treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • clinical diagnosis and histological diagnosis of OLP on the basis of WHO criteria;
  • presence of symptoms related to OLP.

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of systemic conditions that may have affected the study results;
  • state of pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • histological signs of dysplasia;
  • drugs inducing a lichen response (ACE-inhibitors, β-blockers, etc.);
  • treatment of OLP in the six months prior to the start of the programme;
  • presence of extraoral lesions (genital, skin and other)
  • history of previous immunodeficiency or HIV seropositivity;
  • previous allogeneic bone marrow transplantation;
  • presence of systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune diseases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Messina

Messina, 98100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Santonocito S, Polizzi A, De Pasquale R, Ronsivalle V, Lo Giudice A, Isola G. Analysis of the Efficacy of Two Treatment Protocols for Patients with Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 23;18(1):56. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010056.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lichen Planus, OralPrecancerous Conditions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesLichen PlanusLichenoid EruptionsSkin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesNeoplasms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2 groups of patients
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2020

First Posted

December 17, 2020

Study Start

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 15, 2020

Study Completion

June 25, 2020

Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Sharing clinical results

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
1 year
Access Criteria
University website and pubmed

Locations