NCT04668573

Brief Summary

The study aims to investigate the 1) differences between stroke patients and healthy controls in time, steps, angular velocity, stepping patterns, electromyographic responses during turning, and the association of turning to trunk control and motor function after stroke; 2) the effectiveness of trunk training on turning performance, trunk control and motor function in stroke patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 13, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline in turning duration at Week 12

    Turning duration (s) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors. Longer duration represents poorer turning performance.

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in turning angular velocity at Week 12

    Angular velocity (m/s2) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors. Slower angular velocity represents instability during turning.

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in trunk muscles electromyography during turning at Week 12

    Muscle activation patterns (amplitude, % reference voluntary contraction) are observed in bilateral External abdominal oblique (EO) and erector spinae (ES) through an electromyographic analysis. Greater muscle amplitude represents greater muscle contraction.

    Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline in trunk range of motion at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in trunk muscles strength at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in Trunk Impairment Scale at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline in Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in Berg Balance Scale at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change from Baseline in Timed Up and Go test at Week 12

    Baseline and Week 12

Study Arms (2)

Trunk exercise group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received trunk exercise for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.

Other: Trunk exercise

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants remained their regular activities.

Interventions

Trunk exercise includes trunk muscles stretching, trunk muscles strengthening, and task-related trunk control training for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.

Trunk exercise group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age between 20 and 80 years old
  • survivors of a single and unilateral stroke with hemiparesis experienced at least 6 months prior to their participation in the study
  • able to walk independently over a distance of 10 m without walking aids or orthoses
  • able to provide informed consent and follow instructions.

You may not qualify if:

  • having additional musculoskeletal conditions or comorbid disabilities that could affect the assessment
  • having cognitive problems with a Mini-Mental State Examination score less than 24 or aphasia that could prevent subjects from following instructions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital

New Taipei City, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMobility Limitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Pei-Jung Liang

    Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2020

First Posted

December 16, 2020

Study Start

July 13, 2020

Primary Completion

October 31, 2020

Study Completion

October 31, 2020

Last Updated

December 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations