Turning Dysfunction After Stroke: Assessment and Intervention
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to investigate the 1) differences between stroke patients and healthy controls in time, steps, angular velocity, stepping patterns, electromyographic responses during turning, and the association of turning to trunk control and motor function after stroke; 2) the effectiveness of trunk training on turning performance, trunk control and motor function in stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2020
CompletedDecember 16, 2020
December 1, 2020
4 months
December 8, 2020
December 13, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in turning duration at Week 12
Turning duration (s) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors. Longer duration represents poorer turning performance.
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in turning angular velocity at Week 12
Angular velocity (m/s2) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors. Slower angular velocity represents instability during turning.
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in trunk muscles electromyography during turning at Week 12
Muscle activation patterns (amplitude, % reference voluntary contraction) are observed in bilateral External abdominal oblique (EO) and erector spinae (ES) through an electromyographic analysis. Greater muscle amplitude represents greater muscle contraction.
Baseline and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in trunk range of motion at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in trunk muscles strength at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Trunk Impairment Scale at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Other Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Berg Balance Scale at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Timed Up and Go test at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Trunk exercise group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received trunk exercise for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants remained their regular activities.
Interventions
Trunk exercise includes trunk muscles stretching, trunk muscles strengthening, and task-related trunk control training for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 20 and 80 years old
- survivors of a single and unilateral stroke with hemiparesis experienced at least 6 months prior to their participation in the study
- able to walk independently over a distance of 10 m without walking aids or orthoses
- able to provide informed consent and follow instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- having additional musculoskeletal conditions or comorbid disabilities that could affect the assessment
- having cognitive problems with a Mini-Mental State Examination score less than 24 or aphasia that could prevent subjects from following instructions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pei-Jung Liang
Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2020
First Posted
December 16, 2020
Study Start
July 13, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2020
Study Completion
October 31, 2020
Last Updated
December 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share