NCT04666818

Brief Summary

Diabetes is the most common metabolic disease complicating pregnancy, and the number of women in childbearing age facing this problem is rising worldwide. The clinical and social significance of pre-gestational diabetes has become an important issue in the area of public health because this disease can cause maternal complications and influence the development of the offspring during the pregnancy and later in life. Pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes is indeed associated with adverse perinatal outcomes including large-for gestational- age infants (ranging from 48.8 to 62.5%), preterm delivery, and other perinatal complications. Large-for-gestational-age infants to mothers with diabetes are at increased risk for birth trauma, transient tachypnea, and neonatal hypoglycemia. For all these reasons, the medical costs and social burdens caused by this disease are problematic. The mainstay of managing diabetes during pregnancy is glucose monitoring. Conventionally, glucose monitoring is by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) involving multiple pricks to the patients. The limitations of these pricks include pain and a point-in-time assessment without evaluation of the complete glycemic profile before making therapeutic adjustments. Introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) by measuring interstitial fluid glucose has overcome the deficits in SMBG by providing an overview of the glycemic profiles in patients. In most recent years another promising tool became available: the Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) system. Unlike traditional sensor systems, its wired enzyme sensor is calibrated in the factory and therefore requires no user calibrations (fingerstick blood glucose measurements) during the 14 days of wear. Recent studies demonstrated that FGM is effective in reducing glucose fluctuations and preventing hypoglycemic events in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients. No evidence is to date available on the efficacy of FGM on the reduction of the perinatal adverse outcomes during pregnancy in women with pre-gestational diabetes. The investigators propose to randomize a group of women with poorly controlled pregestational diabetes to receive SMBG (standard antenatal care) or FGM plus SMBG during pregnancy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 26, 2020

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

November 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 7, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Flash glucose monitoringPregestational diabetesGlucose controlHbA1cGlycemic variabilityAdverse pregnancy outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration in blood samples

    To compare the efficacy of FGM on HbA1c reduction during pregnancy

    38 weeks

  • coefficient of variation (CV): Adimensional coefficient calculated as the Standard Deviation divided by the mean of all glucose values expressed

    To compare the efficacy of FGM on glucose CV reduction during pregnancy

    33 weeks

  • Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)= Adimensional coefficient calculated mean amplitude of glycemic excursions

    o compare the efficacy of FGM on MAGE reduction during pregnancy

    33 weeks

  • Continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA)= Adimensional coefficient calculated at 1 hour time interval

    To compare the efficacy of FGM on CONGA reduction during pregnancy

    33 weeks

  • MODD= Adimensional coefficient calculated as mean of the daily serum glucose difference.

    To compare the efficacy of FGM on MODD reduction during pregnancy

    33 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Macrosomia: Birth weight above 4000 grams regardless gestational age

    At birth

  • Large for Gestational Age (LGA)= weight at birth above the 90th percentile for gestational age

    At birth

  • Neonatal Hypoglycemia= plasma glucose level of less than 36 mg/dl

    At birth

  • Premature delivery: <37 weeks of gestation

    At birth

  • Cesarean section

    At delivery

Study Arms (2)

Self Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG)

Women used self-monitoring of blood glucose= Control group (CG)

Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)

Women used flash glucose monitoring= FGM group (FG)

Device: Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring

Interventions

Participants in the intervention group were advised to monitor glucose levels by means of flash glucose system.

Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The investigators carried out a multicenter randomized pilot trial by prospectively recruiting poorly controlled (peri-conception HbA1c \>6.5%) pregestational T1D or T2D outpatients in 5 Italian Diabetes Medical Centers. Enrolling Centers were selected on the basis of the experience in following women with pregestational diabetes and on the presence of the neonatal intensive care unit. Randomization was electronically generated at the first pregnancy visit according to a predefined randomization sequence. Women were assigned to either the control group (CG, using the standard SMBG at least 6 times daily) or Flash group (FG, using the FGM system continuously throughout gestation) in a 1:1 ratio.

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant women with pregestational diabetes
  • HbA1c \>6.5%

You may not qualify if:

  • Gestational Diabetes
  • HbA1c \<6.5%

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Catania, Endocrinology Section, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital

Catania, 95122, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tumminia A, Milluzzo A, Festa C, Fresa R, Pintaudi B, Scavini M, Vitacolonna E, Napoli A, Sciacca L. Efficacy of flash glucose monitoring in pregnant women with poorly controlled pregestational diabetes (FlashMom): A randomized pilot study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1851-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Gestational

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesDiabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Laura Laura, MD, PhD

    University of Catania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2020

First Posted

December 14, 2020

Study Start

November 26, 2020

Primary Completion

November 26, 2020

Study Completion

November 26, 2020

Last Updated

December 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations