Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model
BASIC
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With an increase in breast cancer survivors (BCS) in Singapore, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand of survivorship care services. To meet the long-term healthcare needs of Singaporeans in a sustainable manner, the investigators propose to pilot a breast cancer survivorship inter-professional community (BASIC) care model for cancer survivorship. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this care model for implementation among BCS and healthcare providers. The investigators hypothesize that the BASIC model is feasible and acceptable to be evaluated on a larger scale. This new follow-up model can potentially reduce waiting times in tertiary centers without compromising quality of care, directly benefiting participants through more efficient follow-up sessions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2022
CompletedNovember 23, 2022
November 1, 2022
1.4 years
March 18, 2020
November 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in participants' health-related quality of life
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is used. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/ vomiting and pain), a global quality of life status and six single item measures (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial stability). All scales are scored from 0 to 100 where a higher score on functioning and global health status scales is indicative of better functioning; and a higher score on symptom scales and single items is indicative of a higher symptom burden.
Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Change in participants' physical and psychological symptom distress levels
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) is used. The physical domain of the RSCL comprises of 23 items and the psychological distress domain comprises of 7 items. Each item will be rated on a 4-point Likert scale ("not at all", "a little", "quite a bit" and "very much"). A total physical symptom distress score can be summed to give a final score between 23 to 92, where a higher score indicates a higher symptom distress level. A total psychological distress score can be summed to give a final score between 7 to 28, where a higher score indicates a higher psychological distress level.
Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Participants' satisfaction with the shared-care model
One year post-intervention
Change in participants' health utilities
Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Change in healthcare cost and productivity
Baseline, every 6 months up to 12 months
Rate of adherence to breast cancer survivorship care guidelines
From start to end of study, up to 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm
EXPERIMENTALPost-treatment clinical follow-up visits will be staggered between the oncologist and a dedicated PCP. A patient navigator will be assigned to each study participant to conduct follow-up sessions over the phone regularly at an approximate interval of 3 months.
Attentional control arm
NO INTERVENTIONBCS will receive follow-up care by their oncologists and any other healthcare providers under existing usual care practices at NCCS.
Interventions
Study participants will be cared for by a team of healthcare professionals; an oncologist, a PCP and a pharmacist navigator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or older.
- Received a formal diagnosis of breast cancer.
- At least three years after active primary treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (if any) and targeted therapy (if any).
- Ascertained to be a low-risk cancer survivor by oncologist.
- Ambulatory with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, indicative of adequate functioning capacity to travel and receive follow-up care at polyclinics.
- Able to read and understand either English or Mandarin
You may not qualify if:
- Physically or mentally incapable of providing verbal/ written consent.
- Unwell or unable to comply with the study protocol that involves questionnaires completion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National Cancer Centre, Singaporelead
- National University of Singaporecollaborator
- SingHealth Polyclinicscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Center Singapore
Singapore, 169690, Singapore
Related Publications (17)
Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK. Models of Cancer Survivorship Care: Overview and Summary of Current Evidence. J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e19-27. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001403. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PMID: 25205779BACKGROUNDGrunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Stewart J, Cole D, Vessey M. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):705-10.
PMID: 10756611BACKGROUNDGrunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):848-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
PMID: 16418496BACKGROUNDBlaauwbroek R, Tuinier W, Meyboom-de Jong B, Kamps WA, Postma A. Shared care by paediatric oncologists and family doctors for long-term follow-up of adult childhood cancer survivors: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70034-2. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PMID: 18282804BACKGROUNDKe Y, Ng T, Chan A. Survivorship care models for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2125-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4197-y. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PMID: 29696424BACKGROUNDNg T, Toh MR, Cheung YT, Chan A. Follow-up care practices and barriers to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives from Asian oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Nov;23(11):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2700-2. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
PMID: 25791392BACKGROUNDChan A, Lum ZK, Ng T, Eyob T, Wang XJ, Chae JW, Dorajoo S, Shwe M, Gan YX, Fok R, Loh KW, Tan YP, Fan G. Perceptions and Barriers of Survivorship Care in Asia: Perceptions From Asian Breast Cancer Survivors. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;3(2):98-104. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.004929. eCollection 2017 Apr.
PMID: 28717749BACKGROUNDChan A, Gan YX, Oh SK, Ng T, Shwe M, Chan R, Ng R, Goh B, Tan YP, Fan G. A culturally adapted survivorship programme for Asian early stage breast cancer patients in Singapore: A randomized, controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1654-1659. doi: 10.1002/pon.4357. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
PMID: 28024163BACKGROUNDLim HA, Mahendran R, Chua J, Peh CX, Lim SE, Kua EH. The Distress Thermometer as an ultra-short screening tool: a first validation study for mixed-cancer outpatients in Singapore. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
PMID: 24556515BACKGROUNDBreitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Apr;33(2):164-73. doi: 10.1002/nur.20373.
PMID: 20198637BACKGROUNDvan Onzenoort HA, Menger FE, Neef C, Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van der Kuy PH. Participation in a clinical trial enhances adherence and persistence to treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertension. 2011 Oct;58(4):573-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.171074. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PMID: 21825228BACKGROUNDGao F, Ng GY, Cheung YB, Thumboo J, Pang G, Koo WH, Sethi VK, Wee J, Goh C. The Singaporean English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PMID: 18619790BACKGROUNDCheung YB, Thumboo J, Goh C, Khoo KS, Che W, Wee J. The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Cancer. 2004 Dec 15;101(12):2874-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20681.
PMID: 15529310BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDTan ML, Idris DB, Teo LW, Loh SY, Seow GC, Chia YY, Tin AS. Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr-Jun;1(1):22-32. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.135817.
PMID: 27981079BACKGROUNDWhitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26092476BACKGROUNDNg T, Dorajoo SR, Cheung YT, Lam YC, Yeo HL, Shwe M, Gan YX, Foo KM, Loh WK, Koo SL, Jain A, Lee GE, Dent R, Yap YS, Ng R, Chan A. Distinct and heterogeneous trajectories of self-perceived cognitive impairment among Asian breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1185-1192. doi: 10.1002/pon.4635. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29315963BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rose WY Fok
National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2020
First Posted
December 9, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 20, 2022
Study Completion
July 20, 2022
Last Updated
November 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share