Accessible Cancer Care to Enable Support for Survivors Programme
ACCESS
Supportive and Survivorship Care Program for Cancer Patients: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Among Breast and Gynaecological Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
226
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In Singapore, cancer patients are not consistently assessed for unmet survivorship care needs and systematically identified for subsequent referral to useful care services. To address this gap, a preliminary multidisciplinary program is developed to (i) routinely screen and identify cancer patients with high distress levels, and (ii) provide appropriate care referrals after a systematic review by a supportive care nurse. This study hypothesized that breast and gynecological cancer patients receiving timely screening for distress and appropriate supportive care services will report better improvement in quality of life as compared to non-recipients under usual care. This pilot study then aims to evaluate: (i) The effectiveness of the program on a patient level in improving the quality of life and the symptom burden of patients requiring further supportive services. (ii) The feasibility of the program's implementation on a health-system level among breast and gynaecological cancer patients in the outpatient oncology clinics at a specialty cancer centre.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 29, 2019
November 1, 2019
1.5 years
July 4, 2019
November 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in quality of life from baseline across all time points between the intervention and control study arm
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) assesses cancer patients' health-related quality of life for the past week. The global quality of life status scale will be used and it is scored from 0 to 100 where a higher score is indicative of better functioning.
Once at baseline and every 3 months for a period of 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Proportion of patients who achieve a clinically significant improvement or deterioration in quality of life between the intervention and control study arm
12 months post recruitment
Physical and psychological symptom distress levels between the intervention and control study arm
Once at baseline and every 3 months for a period of 12 months
Quality of life of caregivers providing care to patients in the intervention study arm
12 months post recruitment
Fatigue levels
Baseline and 3 months after
Severity of neuropathy
Baseline and 3 months after
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Supportive and survivorship care program
EXPERIMENTALRoutine distress screening will be conducted using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and an accompanying problem list. Participants will complete the screening tool before their consults with oncologists and the results will be stored in their medical records. During the consult, oncologists will review the DT scores and problem list with each participant to provide the corresponding educational materials, advice or referrals. Highly distressed participants may be referred by oncologists to the supportive care nurses (SCN) for further triage and review.
Usual care
PLACEBO COMPARATORNo routine distress screening will be performed.
Interventions
Provision of routine systematic screening using distress thermometer and problem list with accompanying supportive care nurse service.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of breast or gynaecological cancer ascertained by clinical documentation
- Newly diagnosed patients receiving subsequent follow-up care in NCCS
- Able to read and understand English or Chinese
- Capable of providing informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Physically or mentally incapable of providing verbal / written consent
- Patients under active care by the palliative care team
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Centre Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (13)
Loh KW, Ng T, Choo SP, Saw HM, Mahendran R, Tan C, Chang GCY, Ong YJ, Yee ACP, Chan A, Soo KC. Cancer Supportive and Survivorship Care in Singapore: Current Challenges and Future Outlook. J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00117.
PMID: 30241247BACKGROUNDTan ML, Idris DB, Teo LW, Loh SY, Seow GC, Chia YY, Tin AS. Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr-Jun;1(1):22-32. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.135817.
PMID: 27981079BACKGROUNDde Haes JC, van Knippenberg FC, Neijt JP. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br J Cancer. 1990 Dec;62(6):1034-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.434.
PMID: 2257209BACKGROUNDLim HA, Mahendran R, Chua J, Peh CX, Lim SE, Kua EH. The Distress Thermometer as an ultra-short screening tool: a first validation study for mixed-cancer outpatients in Singapore. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
PMID: 24556515BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDCheung YB, Neo SHS, Teo I, Yang GM, Lee GL, Thumboo J, Chia JWK, Koh ARX, Qu DLM, Che WWL, Lau A, Wee HL. Development and evaluation of a quality of life measurement scale in English and Chinese for family caregivers of patients with advanced cancers. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 14;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1108-y.
PMID: 30764839BACKGROUNDReilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
PMID: 10146874BACKGROUNDChan A, Lew C, Wang XJ, Ng T, Chae JW, Yeo HL, Shwe M, Gan YX. Psychometric properties and measurement equivalence of the Multidimensional Fatigue Syndrome Inventory- Short Form (MFSI-SF) amongst breast cancer and lymphoma patients in Singapore. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 19;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0846-6.
PMID: 29351803BACKGROUNDKuroi K, Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Hisamatsu K, Masuda N, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, Ohsumi S, Hausheer FH. Prospective assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy due to weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer (CSP-HOR 02 study). Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1071-80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0550-x. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
PMID: 19089463BACKGROUNDCastel LD, Wallston KA, Saville BR, Alvarez JR, Shields BD, Feurer ID, Cella D. Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Arthralgia Inventory: validation of a newly-developed survey instrument to measure arthralgia. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Jul 28;6:205-14. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S47997. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26251635BACKGROUNDvan Nuenen FM, Donofrio SM, Tuinman MA, van de Wiel HB, Hoekstra-Weebers JE. Feasibility of implementing the 'Screening for Distress and Referral Need' process in 23 Dutch hospitals. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3387-8. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
PMID: 27565789BACKGROUNDRistevski E, Regan M, Jones R, Breen S, Batson A, McGrail MR. Cancer patient and clinician acceptability and feasibility of a supportive care screening and referral process. Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):406-18. doi: 10.1111/hex.12045. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
PMID: 23369083BACKGROUNDCocks K, King MT, Velikova G, de Castro G Jr, Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
PMID: 22418017BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandre Chan, PharmD
National University of Singapore, National Cancer Centre Singapore
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2019
First Posted
July 10, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share