NCT04658797

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to explore satisfaction with vision correction and ease of use of PFM (Personal Face Masks) in a group of spectacle wearers who were randomised to continue wearing spectacles or be fitted with daily disposable contact lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 20, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 1, 2020

Results QC Date

August 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (33)

  • Visual Acuity - High Contrast

    Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart

    Baseline

  • Visual Acuity - Low Contrast

    Visual Acuity under low contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart

    Baseline

  • Visual Acuity - High Contrast

    Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart

    2 weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Heat

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Heat

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Tightness

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Tightness

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Ease in Talking

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Ease in Talking

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 Weeks

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort

    Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)

    2 Weeks

  • Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy).

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 Weeks

  • Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 weeks

  • Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 weeks

  • Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 weeks

  • Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 weeks

  • Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    Baseline

  • Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask

    Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)

    2 weeks

  • Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask

    Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)

    Baseline

  • Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask

    Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)

    2 weeks

  • Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction

    Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)

    Baseline

  • Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction

    Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)

    2 weeks

  • Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction

    Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)

    Baseline

  • Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction

    Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)

    2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Single Vision Spectacle for Vision correction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single Vision Spectacle

Device: Single Vision Spectacle for Vision CorrectionOther: Personal Facemask

somofilcon A Daily disposable contact lenses

EXPERIMENTAL

Daily disposable contact lenses

Device: somofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact LensOther: Personal Facemask

Interventions

Daily Disposable Contact Lens

somofilcon A Daily disposable contact lenses

Single Vision Spectacle

Single Vision Spectacle for Vision correction

Personal Facemask

Single Vision Spectacle for Vision correctionsomofilcon A Daily disposable contact lenses

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • They are aged between 18 and 40 years.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They are a 'neophyte' (i.e. someone who has not worn contact lenses previously, with the exception for the purposes of a trial fitting).
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +8.00D and -10.00D (inclusive) based on the ocular refraction.
  • They have a cylindrical correction of -0.75DC or less in each eye based on the ocular refraction.
  • They own and habitually wear single vision spectacles.
  • They are willing to be fitted with contact lenses and understand they may be randomised to either group.
  • They are willing to wear the contact lenses (if relevant) or spectacles for at least 8 hours per day, 5 days per week.
  • They are able to wear the supplied surgical masks for the majority of time that they need to wear PFM and will wear the PFM for at least one hour a day for at least four days per week.
  • They can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses (if relevant) or spectacles.
  • They agree to not participate in other clinical research while enrolled on this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens
  • wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They require significant ocular/face personal protective equipment beyond a personal face mask.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
  • They have spectacles which are not within ±0.50D of their refractive error.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eurolens Research

Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jose Vega, OD, MSc, FAAO
Organization
CooperVision, Inc

Study Officials

  • Carole Maldonado-Codina

    Eurolens Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2020

First Posted

December 8, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion

April 15, 2021

Study Completion

April 30, 2021

Last Updated

October 20, 2021

Results First Posted

October 20, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations