NCT04656756

Brief Summary

H1a: There is a difference between the severity of physical symptoms displayed by puerperal women who received routine and personalized care during the early postpartum period. H1b: There is a difference between the levels of readiness for discharge among puerperal women who received routine and personalized care during the early postpartum period. H0a: There is no difference between the severity of physical symptoms displayed by puerperal women who received routine and personalized care during the early postpartum period. H0b: There is no difference between the levels of readiness for discharge among puerperal women who received routine and personalized care during the early postpartum period.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 7, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

November 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Personalized careRoutine carePostpartum carePhysical symptomDischarge

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pre- Test Severity of Physical Symptoms

    Postpartum Physical Symptom Severity Scale; this 4-point Likert scale has 18 items aiming to determine the physical postpartum symptoms. The scale is scored as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). The scale assesses the physical symptoms, such as perineum pain, insomnia, constipation, backpain, headache, hemorrhoid, arthralgia, numbness in hands and feet, vaginal discharge and infection, vaginal bleeding, urinary tract infections, dizziness, varicose vein in legs, urinary incontinence, feeling cold abnormally or coldness in hands and feet, and it evaluates the severity of these symptoms. The total scale score varies between 0 and 54. An increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates high severity of physical postpartum symptoms.

    1 hour after the admittance to the maternity service

  • Pre-Test Readiness for Discharge After Birth

    Perceived Readiness for Discharge After Birth Scale-Form for New Mothers (PRDABS-FNM); This is a scale assessing the readiness for discharge by mothers' perceptions. It consists of four subdimensions and 23 items. The first item is answered dichotomously (yes/no). The items between 2 and 23 are calculated through the Likert type points ranging from 0 to 10. The subdimensions consisted of 1. Care skills, 2. Expected support; 3. Strength and ability to cope; 4. Stress control and knowledge of accessing help. The lowest and highest scores are 0 and 220. High scores indicate women's readiness for discharge.

    1 hour after the admittance to the maternity service

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Post-Test Severity of Physical Symptoms

    1 hour before the discharge

  • Post-Test Severity of Physical Symptoms

    1 hour before the discharge

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The mothers in the experimental group (60) were administered.

Behavioral: Personalized Care

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

The mothers in the control group (60) were given the routine care.

Interventions

A clinical and standardized workflow was created for both experimental and control groups. This standardized workflow: consisted of services which included the management of basic medications, routine care regarding the postpartum period, newborn care and health education. After the standardized clinic workflow was formed, a personalized care plan was developed for the experimental group. Each care procedure was shared with the participants in the experimental group. Moreover, all potential alternative care plans were presented to the participants.

Experimental Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To receive personalized care
  • To have vaginal birth
  • To have singleton birth
  • To be within the early postpartum period (the first 24 hours)
  • Not have complications childbirth
  • Not have chronic diseases or mental disorders
  • Older than 18 years
  • To voluntary to participate
  • To know how to read, write and speak in Turkish
  • To stay within this study until the end
  • To fully complete questionnaire
  • To have a newborn with no complications
  • To have a healthy baby

You may not qualify if:

  • To receive routine care
  • To received theoretical training,
  • Not have vaginal birth
  • Having multiple birth
  • Not to be within the early postpartum period (the first 24 hours)
  • Having complications childbirth
  • Having chronic diseases or mental disorders
  • Younger than 18 years
  • To refuse to participate
  • Not knowing how to read, write and speak Turkish
  • To leave early this study
  • Not fill the questionnaire
  • Having a newborn with complications
  • Having a baby in need of medical care

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kutahya Health Science University

Kütahya, 43000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Durmaz A, Komurcu N. Relationship Between Maternal Characteristics and Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis Study. J Nurs Res. 2018 Oct;26(5):362-372. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000245.

    PMID: 29219937BACKGROUND
  • Ceylan B, Eser I. Assessment of individualized nursing care in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Turkey. J Nurs Manag. 2016 Oct;24(7):954-961. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12400. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

  • Chien LY, Tai CJ, Hwang FM, Huang CM. Postpartum physical symptoms and depressive symptomatology at 1 month and 1 year after delivery: a longitudinal questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Sep;46(9):1201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

  • Finlayson K, Crossland N, Bonet M, Downe S. What matters to women in the postnatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231415. eCollection 2020.

  • Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Davey MA, Biro MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Flood M, Shafiei T, Waldenstrom U. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 3;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y.

  • Jansson I, Pilhamar E, Forsberg A. Factors and conditions that have an impact in relation to the successful implementation and maintenance of individual care plans. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011 Jun;8(2):66-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00195.x. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

  • Johansson M, Thies-Lagergren L, Wells MB. Mothers experiences in relation to a new Swedish postnatal home-based model of midwifery care-A cross-sectional study. Midwifery. 2019 Nov;78:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

  • Knier S, Stichler JF, Ferber L, Catterall K. Patients' perceptions of the quality of discharge teaching and readiness for discharge. Rehabil Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):30-9. doi: 10.1002/rnj.164. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

  • McCarter-Spaulding D, Shea S. Effectiveness of Discharge Education on Postpartum Depression. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):168-72. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000236.

  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e140-e150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002633.

  • Nurhayati N, Songwathana P, Vachprasit R. Surgical patients' experiences of readiness for hospital discharge and perceived quality of discharge teaching in acute care hospitals. J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1728-1736. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14764. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

  • Poochikian-Sarkissian S, Sidani S, Ferguson-Pare M, Doran D. Examining the relationship between patient-centred care and outcomes. Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2010;32(4):14-21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Aysegul Durmaz

    KSBU

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants didn't know which group they were allocated. The participants will be blind when they take personalized care from investigators.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study was conducted as a single blind, prospective, and simple randomized controlled trial. The sample was calculated through Power analysis. Consequently, the sample size calculated for α:0.05 and 1-β= 0.95 was 48.Considering the possibility that participants of the sample might be lost or abandon the study, 120 mothers who met the criteria of inclusion to experimental (E) (n=60) and control (C) (n=60) groups were included and assigned to both groups using the permuted block randomization method. The size and number of blocks divided into two groups as E and C was calculated as 20 (3E and 3C) with six mothers in each block. Using Microsoft Office Excel 2013, numbers ranging from 1 to 20 were randomly generated.A total of 120 mothers were evenly and homogeneously assigned to both groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2020

First Posted

December 7, 2020

Study Start

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

December 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication
Access Criteria
If study' IPD are used, my article should be cited.

Locations