Comparison of the Effect of Traditional Method and Eras Protocol in Obesity Surgery
Comparıson Of The Effects Of The Eras Protocol Applıcatıon And The Effects Of The Tradıtıonal Method On The In Obesıty Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of care based on the "Accelerated Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol" and the traditional method in bariatric surgery and demonstrate the difference the two methods based on evidence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2023
CompletedMarch 30, 2023
March 1, 2023
6 months
December 18, 2022
March 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Presence and level of postoperative pain
In the sample calculation of the research; To measure the significant differences between independent groups, a minimum of 128 samples is required (64 for each group) in order to determine 80% statistical power and α = 0.05 significance and d = 0.50 effect size in the t-test to be performed. In order to evaluate the effect of the post-operative accelerated recovery (ERAS) protocol on the patient recovery process, 128 patients who applied to the hospital for bariatric surgery between April and June 2022 were included in the study. 64 patients were divided into groups as the ERAS Protocol group and 64 patients as the control group. Postoperative pain status was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). In determining the severity of pain, the McGill Pain Scale Numerical Evaluation was evaluated as 0-10 points, 0 no pain, 10 unbearable pain. A score of 4 or less for patients meant less pain.
3 days
Presence of post-operative nausea, vomiting and retching
Postoperative nausea, vomiting and retching were evaluated with the "Rhodes Nausea-Vomiting Rectal Index". According to the sub-dimensions of the scale, each of the symptoms of nausea, vomiting and retching was scored in the range of 0-12 points. 0 meant the least distress - 12 meant the most distress.
3 days
Study Arms (2)
Surgical Procedure with ERAS Protocol
EXPERIMENTALERAS Maintenance Protocol The basic philosophy of the ERAS Protocol is to reduce metabolic stress due to surgical trauma, and to return to normal activity as soon as possible by supporting the normalization of functions in a short time. ERAS protocols are a protocol consisting of a total of 24 items covering the perioperative period of a patient, which starts in the outpatient clinic in the preoperative period and ends at home with discharge. includes applications. Elements of this preparation and treatment method, which is different from the traditional, were applied to our patients in this group before (11), during the operation (6) and after the operation (7). In the study, the data were collected with the personal introduction form introducing the characteristics of the patients, the Rhodes Nausea-Vomiting and Regurgitation Index (WPI), the Mcgill Pain Scale and the Postoperative Evaluation Form created within the scope of the ERAS Care Protocol.
Surgery Procedure with the traditional method
NO INTERVENTIONItThe group that underwent surgery with the traditional method is the control group. The surgical procedure preparation procedure in the institution where the study was conducted was not exceeded. The data in the control group were collected with the patient information form, the Postoperative Evaluation Form to evaluate the symptoms after the surgical intervention, the McGill Pain Scale Short Form, the Rhodes Nausea-Vomiting Regurgitation Index.
Interventions
It covers the period before, during and after the surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age who underwent bariatric surgery
- Open to communication and collaborative,
- Patients who volunteered to take part in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with major visual, hearing and speech impairments
- Patients who want to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bahcesehir university
Istanbul, Besiktas, 34349, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eylül Tülay Aykul, master
Bahçeşehir University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- training nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2022
First Posted
March 30, 2023
Study Start
February 14, 2022
Primary Completion
July 31, 2022
Study Completion
February 10, 2023
Last Updated
March 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03