Behavior Therapy for Irritability in Autism
BTIA
2 other identifiers
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a clinical trial of a novel intervention, Behavioral Therapy for Irritability and Aggression (BTIA), for adolescents on the autism spectrum. The main goals of BTIA are to help adolescents develop emotion regulation skills to handle frustration and to strengthen skills for navigating the challenging and diverse experiences associated with the transition to adulthood. The study will test whether BTIA can be helpful to adolescents on the autism spectrum and to their families.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedOctober 20, 2025
October 1, 2025
5.1 years
December 2, 2020
October 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale is a 16-item scale that reflects the frequency and severity of incidents of aggressive behavior. Scores can range from 0 (minimum) to 300 (maximum) with higher scores reflecting worse outcome.
baseline (week 0)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale is a 16-item scale that reflects the frequency and severity of incidents of aggressive behavior. Scores can range from 0 (minimum) to 300 (maximum) with higher scores reflecting worse outcome.
midpoint (week 8)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale is a 16-item scale that reflects the frequency and severity of incidents of aggressive behavior. Scores can range from 0 (minimum) to 300 (maximum) with higher scores reflecting worse outcome.
endpoint (week 16)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)
Modified Overt Aggression Scale is a 16-item scale that reflects the frequency and severity of incidents of aggressive behavior. Scores can range from 0 (minimum) to 300 (maximum) with higher scores reflecting worse outcome.
six-month follow up (week 42)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score (CGI-I)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score assigned by an independent evaluator (IE) who will be blind to treatment assignment is the categorical primary outcome measure of aggressive behavior. The CGI-I reflects the IE's assessment of overall change from baseline rated on a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 is very much improved, 2 is much improved, 3 is minimally improved, 4 is no change, 5 is minimally worse, 6 is much worth, and 7 is very much worse. Higher scores reflect worse outcome. By convention, ratings of very much improved (1) or much improved (2) define positive response; all other scores are classified as a negative response.
baseline (week 0)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score (CGI-I)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score assigned by an independent evaluator (IE) who will be blind to treatment assignment is the categorical primary outcome measure of aggressive behavior. The CGI-I reflects the IE's assessment of overall change from baseline rated on a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 is very much improved, 2 is much improved, 3 is minimally improved, 4 is no change, 5 is minimally worse, 6 is much worth, and 7 is very much worse. Higher scores reflect worse outcome. By convention, ratings of very much improved (1) or much improved (2) define positive response; all other scores are classified as a negative response.
midpoint (week 8)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score (CGI-I)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score assigned by an independent evaluator (IE) who will be blind to treatment assignment is the categorical primary outcome measure of aggressive behavior. The CGI-I reflects the IE's assessment of overall change from baseline rated on a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 is very much improved, 2 is much improved, 3 is minimally improved, 4 is no change, 5 is minimally worse, 6 is much worth, and 7 is very much worse. Higher scores reflect worse outcome. By convention, ratings of very much improved (1) or much improved (2) define positive response; all other scores are classified as a negative response.
endpoint (week 16)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score (CGI-I)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Score assigned by an independent evaluator (IE) who will be blind to treatment assignment is the categorical primary outcome measure of aggressive behavior. The CGI-I reflects the IE's assessment of overall change from baseline rated on a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 is very much improved, 2 is much improved, 3 is minimally improved, 4 is no change, 5 is minimally worse, 6 is much worth, and 7 is very much worse. Higher scores reflect worse outcome. By convention, ratings of very much improved (1) or much improved (2) define positive response; all other scores are classified as a negative response.
six-month follow up (week 42)
Irritability subscale - Aberrant Behavioral Checklist
The 15-item Irritability subscale includes questions about aggression, tantrums, agitation, and unstable mood that are rated on a 4-point scale with the following anchor points: 0 = not at all a problem; 1 = the behavior is a problem but slight in degree; 2 = the problem is moderately serious; 3 = the problem is severe in degree. The total Irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
baseline (week 0)
Irritability subscale - Aberrant Behavioral Checklist
The 15-item Irritability subscale includes questions about aggression, tantrums, agitation, and unstable mood that are rated on a 4-point scale with the following anchor points: 0 = not at all a problem; 1 = the behavior is a problem but slight in degree; 2 = the problem is moderately serious; 3 = the problem is severe in degree. The total Irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
midpoint (week 8)
Irritability subscale - Aberrant Behavioral Checklist
The 15-item Irritability subscale includes questions about aggression, tantrums, agitation, and unstable mood that are rated on a 4-point scale with the following anchor points: 0 = not at all a problem; 1 = the behavior is a problem but slight in degree; 2 = the problem is moderately serious; 3 = the problem is severe in degree. The total Irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
endpoint (week 16)
Irritability subscale - Aberrant Behavioral Checklist
The 15-item Irritability subscale includes questions about aggression, tantrums, agitation, and unstable mood that are rated on a 4-point scale with the following anchor points: 0 = not at all a problem; 1 = the behavior is a problem but slight in degree; 2 = the problem is moderately serious; 3 = the problem is severe in degree. The total Irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
six-month follow up (week 42)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - Communication Domain Score
baseline (week 0)
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - Communication Domain Score
endpoint (week 16)
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - Communication Domain Score
six-month follow up (week 42)
Other Outcomes (8)
Affective Reactivity Index (ARI)
baseline (week 0)
Affective Reactivity Index (ARI)
midpoint (week 8)
Affective Reactivity Index (ARI)
endpoint (week 16)
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Behavioral Therapy for Irritability in Autism (BTIA)
EXPERIMENTALBTIA consists of 15 ninety-minute weekly sessions that will be conducted with the teens and their parents by experienced therapists using a structured, detailed manual.
Psychoeducation and Supportive Therapy (PST)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPST consist of 15 weekly, ninety-minute sessions focused on learning about and discussing issues of diagnosis, treatment and educational services with an experienced therapist could be helpful to children on the autism spectrum and their families.
Interventions
The child-focused components of BTIA are organized in modules dedicated to emotion regulation, problem solving and practice of planned steps to prevent or resolve conflicts. Each session contains a set of six to seven goals, and each goal contains a menu of techniques and activities that can be used to attain this goal. In order to administer the treatment in a flexible yet reliable manner, the therapist works collaboratively with the child and his or her parents to select activities that are perceived as relevant for attaining the session's goal. The parent-focused components of BTIA include include education about the effects of antecedents and consequences on disruptive behavior, developing strategies for reducing or altering antecedent events that may lead to disruptive reactions and helping parents to use reinforcement of competent and calm responses in potentially frustrating situations.
Each PST session will start with a review of events of the past week and include queries of topics such as school, interests, hobbies, and family with an overarching goal of enhancing subjective well-being. A major objective is to enables the participant to discuss his or her concerns with a therapist toward a goal of enhancing overall psychological wellbeing. Education about autism diagnosis and services is also provided to families as part of PST.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Boys and girls, ages 12 to 18 years inclusive
- Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
- Presence of disruptive behaviors such as irritability and anger outbursts
- No planned changes in the intensity of current treatment(s)
- Medication free or on stable medication
- Sufficient language for participation in verbal therapy
- Lives within driving distance from New Haven, CT
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a medical condition that would interfere with participation in the study
- Presence of a current psychiatric disorder that requires immediate clinical attention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yale Child Study Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Related Publications (6)
Sukhodolsky DG, Smith SD, McCauley SA, Ibrahim K, Piasecka JB. Behavioral Interventions for Anger, Irritability, and Aggression in Children and Adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;26(1):58-64. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0120. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
PMID: 26745682BACKGROUNDScahill L, Bearss K, Lecavalier L, Smith T, Swiezy N, Aman MG, Sukhodolsky DG, McCracken C, Minshawi N, Turner K, Levato L, Saulnier C, Dziura J, Johnson C. Effect of Parent Training on Adaptive Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Disruptive Behavior: Results of a Randomized Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;55(7):602-609.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 7.
PMID: 27343887BACKGROUNDIbrahim K, Eilbott JA, Ventola P, He G, Pelphrey KA, McCarthy G, Sukhodolsky DG. Reduced Amygdala-Prefrontal Functional Connectivity in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Co-occurring Disruptive Behavior. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Dec;4(12):1031-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
PMID: 30979647BACKGROUNDIbrahim K, Kalvin C, Marsh CL, Anzano A, Gorynova L, Cimino K, Sukhodolsky DG. Anger Rumination is Associated with Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Sep;49(9):3656-3668. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04085-y.
PMID: 31144231BACKGROUNDHenriksen M, Skrove M, Hoftun GB, Sund ER, Lydersen S, Tseng WL, Sukhodolsky DG. Developmental Course and Risk Factors of Physical Aggression in Late Adolescence. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Aug;52(4):628-639. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01049-7.
PMID: 32852728BACKGROUNDKalvin CB, Gladstone TR, Jordan R, Rowley S, Marsh CL, Ibrahim K, Sukhodolsky DG. Assessing Irritability in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using the Affective Reactivity Index. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 May;51(5):1496-1507. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04627-9.
PMID: 32734421BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denis Sukhodolsky, Ph.D.
Yale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Primary outcomes will be assessed by an independent evaluator who will be "blinded" to subject's treatment assignment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2020
First Posted
December 4, 2020
Study Start
December 10, 2020
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Analyzed data will be submitted at the time of publication, and publications resulting from these data will be associated with NDAR entries using the NDAR Study Feature.
- Access Criteria
- Data generated with funds from this grant will be freely available on the NIH/NDAR database
Research data from this study will be shared via the National Database for Autism Research and NIH Data Repositories (https://nda.nih.gov/) consistent with the Yale University Policy. The data management for this study will be conducted using the OnCore system at YCCI (https://medicine.yale.edu/ycci/oncore/), which enables translation of data to de-identified data sets that can be placed online using GUID technology as specified in Federal guidelines. At the time of permission/consent/assent, participants and their parents will be informed of the data-sharing plan. Raw data generated by the project will be quality-certified by our research team (including fidelity to research procedures, proper file format, artifact removal, and de-identifying, resulting in artifact-free raw data) prior to submission to NDAR for usability. Consistent with the NDAR data sharing policy, data will be submitted, at the individual level, on all enrolled subjects.