NCT04651114

Brief Summary

The purpose of this project is to develop, and pilot test a decision-making tool that is tailored for women with physical disabilities to support those women in making a decision about whether or not a pregnancy is right given the participant's situation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 3, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 11, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 14, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 14, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 14, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

November 25, 2020

Results QC Date

May 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Medical decision makingPregnancy, planned

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Values Clarity Sub-scale

    The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure. Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action. For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy. The Values Clarity sub-scale refers to how much a respondent is clear about the values that guide their decision-making. Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree \[5\] to strongly disagree \[1\]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15. Higher scores represent greater clarity of values.

    12 weeks

  • Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Support Sub-scale

    The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure. Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action. For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy. The Support for Decision Making sub-scale refers to how much support a respondent has from others about their decision-making. Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree \[5\] to strongly disagree \[1\]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15. Higher scores represent greater support for decision-making.

    12 weeks

  • Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Uncertainty Sub-scale

    The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure. Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action. For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy. The Uncertainty about the decision sub-scale refers to how much a respondent is uncertain about the decision. Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree \[5\] to strongly disagree \[1\]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15. Higher scores represent greater certainty about the decision.

    12 weeks

  • Final Readiness to Make a Choice in Stage of Decision-Making Scale

    The Stage of Decision Making is a single item self-report measure. The options range from "haven't begun to think about choices" to "have already made a decision and unlikely to change my mind". The instructions were modified to refer to pregnancy and excluded the first two options of not having begun to think about choices given inclusion criteria. For this study, the scale ranged from 1 (are considering the decision now) to 4 (have already made a decision and am unlikely to change my mind). A higher score reflects greater readiness to make a decision.

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Feasibility - Acceptability

    12 weeks

  • Feasibility - Demand

    12 weeks

  • Feasibility - Ease of Use

    12 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Decision-making tool

EXPERIMENTAL

Women will receive the decision making tool and use for a 3 month period.

Behavioral: Decision-making tool

Interventions

Women will be directed to a secure website to download a copy of the decision making tool and worksheets (they can download as many copies as they wish to). The women will use the tool and worksheets at their own pace for the pilot study period. The decision making tool is a 23-page tool and set of 9 downloadable worksheets. The tool covers topics relevant to women with disabilities in considering or planning a pregnancy: 1) Overview of Pregnancy: 2) Knowing what is important; 3) Partners, family and important relationships; 4) Physical function and independence; 5) Health and wellbeing; 6) Caring for an infant; 7) Financial resources \& insurance; 8) How to find reliable information and resources; 9) Connecting with other women with physical disabilities; 10) Dealing with reactions of others, stigma and bias, pressure; and 11) Reaching a decision.

Decision-making tool

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physical disability, defined by loss or impairment of physical function limiting one or more important life activities
  • Mild, moderate or severe disability severity; severity will be assessed based on the need for assistance with daily life activities and/or personal care
  • Actively planning or in the process of making a decision about whether or not to get pregnant in the near future.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Claire Kalpakjian
Organization
University of Michigan

Study Officials

  • Claire Kalpakjian, PhD, MS

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: A pre-post design was selected for feasibility and preliminary efficacy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2020

First Posted

December 3, 2020

Study Start

December 11, 2020

Primary Completion

May 14, 2021

Study Completion

May 14, 2021

Last Updated

July 14, 2022

Results First Posted

July 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations