Central Programming in Patients With a Bionic Hand After Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury
1 other identifier
observational
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traumatic brachial plexus lesions may lead to permanent impairment of hand function despite brachial plexus surgery. In selected cases the affected forearm can be amputated and replaced by a bionic hand. It is unclear how cortical activation patterns change after the injury and after acquisition of the hand prosthesis considering the complex changes in sensory and motor feedback. The aim of the study is to measure cortical activity with fMRI during actual and imagery movements with the affected and healthy arm in a group of patients after traumatic brachial plexus injury and a group in whom this was followed by replacement with a bionic hand. In this prospective study three groups of patients will participate: 1) 3 adult patients with a traumatic brachial plexus lesion eligible for a bionic arm but prior to its acquisition, 2) 3 patients with a traumatic brachial plexus lesion who have acquired the bionic arm already, and 3) 10 healthy subjects. The investigators will measure cortical activity using fMRI BOLD tasks of closing the hand and motor imagery of this movement. Cortical activity will be compared between the three groups. Additionally, regional gray matter volume, resting-state, and DTI networks will be studied. Written informed consent will be provided prior to the investigation. The complete examination has a duration of approximately 45 minutes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 28, 2023
September 1, 2023
1.9 years
October 1, 2020
September 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
task-related cortical activity - fMRI BOLD signal
The investigators will measure cortical activity measured as a fMRI BOLD (blood-oxygen-level-dependent) signal, during four tasks: closing the hand (lef tand right) and motor imagery of this movement.
MRI task scanning approximately 20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
resting state activity - fMRI BOLD signal
MRI resting state scanning approximately 10 minutes
diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI
DTI scanning approximately 10 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Patients - bionic hand acquired
3 adult patients who acquired a bionic hand at the Medical University of Vienna after a traumatic brachial plexus lesion.
Patients - bionic hand not yet acquired
3 patients eligible for the bionic hand prior to a possible amputation.
Control subjects
Ten control subjects will be included for comparison.
Interventions
MRI scan
Eligibility Criteria
A group of 3 adult patients who acquired a bionic hand at the Medical University of Vienna after a traumatic brachial plexus lesion, and a group of 3 patients eligible for the bionic hand prior to a possible amputation will be included. The number of patients included is based on the rarity of the procedure and thus the very limited number of eligible study participants. Ten control subjects will be included for comparison.
You may qualify if:
- age above 18 years
- participants should understand German or English
- patients with a bionic hand are selected who are able to open and close the hand prosthesis.
You may not qualify if:
- the standard contraindications for MRI will be checked for according to hospital protocol (ferromagnetic devices such as clips, claustrophobia, etc.) and, if necessary, patients will be excluded from participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Related Publications (7)
Aszmann OC, Roche AD, Salminger S, Paternostro-Sluga T, Herceg M, Sturma A, Hofer C, Farina D. Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2183-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61776-1. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
PMID: 25724529BACKGROUNDSturma A, Hruby LA, Prahm C, Mayer JA, Aszmann OC. Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries Using Surface EMG Biofeedback: Protocols for Clinical Application. Front Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;12:906. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00906. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30564090BACKGROUNDDecety J, Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 May;3(5):172-178. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01312-1.
PMID: 10322473BACKGROUNDLotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001 Nov;124(Pt 11):2268-77. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.11.2268.
PMID: 11673327BACKGROUNDHotz-Boendermaker S, Funk M, Summers P, Brugger P, Hepp-Reymond MC, Curt A, Kollias SS. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.065. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
PMID: 17919932BACKGROUNDDate S, Kurumadani H, Yoshimura M, Fukae A, Onishi K, Hayashi J, Shinomiya R, Sunagawa T. Long-term disuse of the hand affects motor imagery ability in patients with complete brachial plexus palsy. Neuroreport. 2019 Apr 10;30(6):452-456. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001229.
PMID: 30855560BACKGROUNDAnguelova GV, Rombouts SARB, van Dijk JG, Buur PF, Malessy MJA. Increased brain activation during motor imagery suggests central abnormality in Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. Neurosci Res. 2017 Oct;123:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 4.
PMID: 28479130BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oskar Aszmann, prof. dr.
Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Visiting Researcher at Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2020
First Posted
December 2, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09