NCT04646811

Brief Summary

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a long-overdue valvular pathology. Its prevalence is significant and increasing with the aging of the population. It is often a consequence of chronic left cardiac pathologies or atrial fibrillation. Surgical treatment is recommended in severe symptomatic TR or when the tricuspid annulus is dilated with TR identified prior to scheduled left heart valve surgery. TR are mainly secondary (complicating left heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation and atrial dilatation) and pose a difficult problem related to the prognosis. The risk of death or hospitalization is high under medical treatment. Nevertheless, the surgical results are disappointing with significant morbidity and mortality, which are increased by associated comorbidities that are frequent in these sorts of patients. The benefit-risk assessment of surgery is limited by multiple confounders. This justifies the evaluation of alternative methods aimed at correcting TR with less interventional risk. The Clip for the tricuspid valve has been evaluated in the TRILUMINATE trial (inclusion of 85 patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic TR with a 6-month follow-up). The Triclip system appears to be safe and effective at reducing tricuspid regurgitation by at least one grade. This reduction could translate to significant clinical improvement at 6 months post-procedure. It justified the European Conformity (CE) mark obtention. A very similar system for the mitral valve (Mitraclip) was previously tested in the randomized EVEREST II study against conventional surgery. The results of the EVEREST II trial justified the recourse to percutaneous edge-to edge mitral repair in patients with primary mitral regurgitation when the patient is contraindicated to conventional surgery. The Mitra-FR study made it possible to study the role of Mitraclip for treating patient suffering from a secondary mitral insufficiency. It leads to the implementation of this technique in selected patients. For secondary TR, several series underscored its prevalence and its clinical consequences. TR treatment justifies the proposal for a randomized study. As a matter of fact, evidence for treating are seriously lacking. Surgical surveys report hospital mortality \~ 8.8%. It, therefore, seems necessary to conduct a study as robust as possible to evaluate the contribution of clip for the tricuspid valve (as an innovative percutaneous technique) compared to conventional pharmacological treatment in patients who are unsuitable for a surgical isolated correction of the TR and who has suitable anatomy for clip for the tricuspid valve. It will be necessary to demonstrate clinical, functional (quality of life), echocardiographic and biological benefit of the percutaneous treatment vs optimized medical treatment alone.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

26 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 10, 2021

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 23, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

secondary Tricuspid Regurgitationleast severe Tricuspid Regurgitationsymptomatic patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Milton Packer clinical composite score

    Milton Packer clinical composite score classifies each patient into 1 of 3 categories (improved, worsened, unchanged), and is determined aggregating evaluation functional using NYHA class, quality of life score using patient global assessment and number of major cardio-vascular events

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (22)

  • number of participants with all-cause mortality

    12 months

  • number of participants with tricuspid valve surgery

    12 months

  • rate of heart failure hospitalizations

    12 months

  • assessment of quality of life improvement

    0 and 12 months

  • quality of life score

    6 and 12 months

  • +17 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Tricuspid valve

EXPERIMENTAL

tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve

Procedure: Tricuspid valve

Best medical treatment

OTHER
Other: Best medical treatment

Interventions

Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy

Tricuspid valve

Best medical therapy alone

Best medical treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Symptomatic secondary (at least) severe TR (Carpentier Type IIIB (restrictive) and / or I (tricuspid annulus dilation)) stable for at least 30 days
  • NYHA functional class II to IV without cirrhosis and/or ascites
  • Signs of heart failure in the previous 12-months with or without having been hospitalized
  • Stable optimized medical and/or interventional treatment
  • Ineligible for corrective action on the valve by surgical approach after a specialized multidisciplinary consultation ("heart team") including at least a cardio-thoracic surgeon, an interventional cardiologist, an imaging-cardiologist and an Anesthesiologist).
  • Signature of an informed consent
  • Central core-laboratory analysis : TR characterized before Implantation by at least one of the following criteria:
  • Regurgitation volume \> 45 mL / beat
  • Surface of the regurgitant orifice \> 40 mm²
  • Vena contracta\> 7mm
  • Gap between leaflets ≤ 10 mm (at the presumed location of the clip)
  • Patient treated with Mitraclip or other percutaneous approach on the mitral valve in the past 3-month
  • Any prior tricuspid valve procedure that would interfere with placement of the Triclip device
  • Tricuspid valve leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in TR. This may include:
  • +28 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (26)

Service de Cardiologie AZ Sint-Jan

Bruges, Belgium

Location

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Brussels, Belgium

Location

CHU Liège

Liège, Belgium

Location

CHU Amiens

Amiens, France

Location

CHU Angers

Angers, France

Location

CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque

Bordeaux, France

Location

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

Le Plessis-Robinson, France

Location

CHU Lille

Lille, France

Location

Hôpital Privé Le Bois

Lille, France

Location

Hospices Civils de Lyon Groupement Hospitalier EST

Lyon, France

Location

APHM - Hôpital La Timone

Marseille, France

Location

Hôpital de Saint-Joseph

Marseille, France

Location

Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Jacques Cartier

Massy, France

Location

Clinique du Millénaire

Montpellier, France

Location

CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu et Hôpital Nord Laennec

Nantes, France

Location

Hôpital Bichat

Paris, France

Location

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Paris, France

Location

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, France

Location

CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

Rennes, France

Location

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, France

Location

CHU La Réunion

Saint-Denis, France

Location

CHU Saint-Etienne

Saint-Etienne, France

Location

CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil

Toulouse, France

Location

Clinique Pasteur

Toulouse, France

Location

CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau

Tours, France

Location

Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne

Villeurbanne, France

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Coisne A, L'Official G, Dreyfus J, Ternacle J, Leurent G, Le Roux PY, Ganivet A, Sportouch-Dukhan C, Lavie-Badie Y, Guerin P, Rouleau F, Diakov C, Van Der Heyden J, Obadia JF, Nejjari M, Karam N, Bernard A, Neylon A, Pierrard R, Tchetche D, Ghostine S, Istratoaie S, Donal E. Echocardiographic Outcomes After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri.Fr Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Nov 18:S1936-878X(25)00531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.09.010. Online ahead of print.

  • Donal E, Dreyfus J, Leurent G, Coisne A, Leroux PY, Ganivet A, Sportouch C, Lavie-Badie Y, Guerin P, Rouleau F, Diakov C, van der Heyden J, Lafitte S, Obadia JF, Nejjari M, Karam N, Bernard A, Neylon A, Pierrard R, Tchetche D, Ghostine S, Ducrocq G, Si Moussi T, Jeu A, Peltier M, Cosyns B, Le Dolley Y, Habib G, Auffret V, Le Ven F, Picard F, Piriou N, Laperche T, Galli E, Istratoaie S, Jouan J, Bonnet G, de Groote P, Anselmi A, Trochu JN, Oger E; Tri-Fr Investigators. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Severe Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri.Fr Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Jan 14;333(2):124-132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21189.

  • Donal E, Leurent G, Iung B. Are We Right to Believe in the Value of Transcatheter Treatment of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):240-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.037. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Donal Erwan

    CHU Rennes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2020

First Posted

November 30, 2020

Study Start

February 10, 2021

Primary Completion

April 23, 2024

Study Completion

April 23, 2024

Last Updated

June 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations