NCT04641897

Brief Summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a form of acute lung injury of inflammatory origin, which represents a public health problem worldwide due to its prevalence, and its high mortality rate, close to 40%. Mechanical ventilation is a fundamental therapy to improve gas exchange, however, it can also induce further lung injury, a phenomenon known as ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). The limitation of tidal volume is the strategy that has shown the greatest decrease in mortality and is the cornerstone of protective ventilation. However, the respiratory rate, a fundamental parameter in the programming of the mechanical ventilator, has not been evaluated in most of the main clinical studies to date. Moreover, the natural clinical response to the use of a low tidal volume strategy is the increase in respiratory rate, which may harm the lung as it increases the energy applied to the lung parenchyma. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a lower respiratory rate, tolerating moderate hypercapnia, is associated with less VILI, measured by the release of proinflammatory mediators at the systemic level (biotrauma), compared to a conventional higher respiratory rate strategy in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. This effect is mediated by lower energy applied to the pulmonary parenchyma. To confirm this hypothesis the investigators propose a prospective cross-over clinical trial in 30 adult patients with ARDS in its acute phase, which will be randomized to two sequences of ventilation. Each period will last 12 hours, and respiratory rate (RR) will be set according to PaCO2 goal: 1) Low RR, PaCO2 60-70 mmHg; and 2) High RR, PaCO2 35-40 mmHg. Protective ventilation will be applied according to ICU standards under continuous sedation and neuromuscular blockade. Invasive systemic arterial pressure and extravascular lung water will be monitored through an arterial catheter (PICCO® system), and airway and esophageal pressures and hemodynamics continuously measured throughout the protocol. The main outcome will be Interleukin-6 in plasma. At baseline and at the end of each period blood samples will be taken for analysis, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and transthoracic echocardiography will be registered. After the protocol, patients will continue their management according to ICU standards.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Respiratory rateMechanical ventilationARDSVentilator induced lung injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in IL-6

    levels of IL-6 in plasma

    baseline, 12 and 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Changes in transpulmonary driving pressures

    Baseline, 12 and 24 hours

  • Changes in Auto PEEP

    Baseline, 12 and 24 hours

  • Changes in mean airway pressure

    Baseline, 12 and 24 hours

  • Changes in level of energy applied to the lungs

    Baseline, 12 and 24 hours

  • Changes in arterials blood gases

    Baseline, 12 and 24 hours

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sequence A

OTHER

Sequence A: Low RR for 12 hours - High RR for 12 hours

Procedure: Respiratory rate modification

Sequence B

OTHER

Sequence B: High RR for 12 hours - Low RR for 12 hours.

Procedure: Respiratory rate modification

Interventions

During the Low RR and High RR periods, respiratory rate will be set depending on baseline ABG and according a nomogram so as to have an approximate difference of 10 points between groups, while maintining PaCO2 and pH values within safety limits (pH 7.20 to 7.45, and PaCO2 35 to 60 mmHg). Once defined the target respiratory rate, this will be decreased or increased in 4 points each 30 to 45 min, and ABG repeated at 2 hours. At this time, changes will be made to keep PaCO2 and pH values within safety limits, and ABG repeated at 6 and finally 12 hours. During the whole period, inspiratory to expiratory ratio will be maintained constant, and only changed to keep inspiratory time above 0.6 seconds (usually at high resp rate).

Sequence ASequence B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients intubated and under mechanical ventilation with acute respiratory distress syndrome less than 48 hours
  • Acute onset (less than 1 week)
  • Chest-X-ray: bilateral infiltrates
  • Absence of heart failure or hydrostatic pulmonary edema
  • Oxygenation disorder: PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<200, with PEEP ≥5 cmH2O

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Previous chronic respiratory disease (chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, intersticial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic bronchiectasis)
  • Hypercapnic respiratory failure, defined as PaCO2 \>60 mmHg or pH\<7.25 despite a RR \>30.
  • Concomitant severe metabolic acidosis: pH\<7.20
  • Catastrophic respiratory failure, defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<80, despite optimization of ventilatory parameters, or need for ECMO.
  • Contraindication to hypercapnia, such as intracranial hypertension or acute coronary syndrome
  • Use of vasoconstrictor drugs in increasing doses in the last 2 hours (≥0.5 μg/kg/min of noradrenaline) or average blood pressure \<65mmHg
  • Pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema, not drained.
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of mental or intellectual disability prior to hospitalization
  • Early limitation of therapeutic effort

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clinico Universidad Catolica

Santiago, Chile

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Damiani LF, Basoalto R, Oviedo V, Alegria L, Soto D, Bachmann MC, Jalil Y, Santis C, Carpio D, Ulloa R, Valenzuela D, Vera M, Schultz MJ, Retamal J, Bruhn A, Bugedo G. Effect of decreasing respiratory rate on the mechanical power of ventilation and lung injury biomarkers: a randomized cross-over clinical study in COVID-19 ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jul 9;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00782-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory AspirationVentilator-Induced Lung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLung Injury

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2020

First Posted

November 24, 2020

Study Start

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion

February 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations