C-Brace Prospective Registry
A Prospective Registry of Patients Fitted With a Microprocessor-controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis
1 other identifier
observational
250
4 countries
76
Brief Summary
To gather prospective safety and effectiveness data for the C-Brace System following the standard of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
76 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedApril 30, 2025
April 1, 2025
11 years
November 17, 2020
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Primary Efficacy: Timed Walk Test
The Timed Walk test is used to measure gait speed on either a 25-foot or 10-meter straight course timed using the middle 10 feet or 6 meters, respectively. Three trials are performed and the average of the three used. Patients are allowed the use of assistive device (such as a cane, crutches or walker) that they normally use for in home or community ambulation.
Change in walking speed with the C-Brace measured either by a 25-ft or 10-m walk test compared to baseline measurements when assessed 12 months after initial fitting
Primary Efficacy: Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Originally designed to test mobility skills in the elderly, the TUG is a validated test for quantifying functional mobility and risk of falling. In the TUG Test, patients are asked to stand up from a chair, walk ten feet, turn and return to the chair, and then sit on the chair. For centers routinely using the TUG as a part of their standard of care, this data (time to complete in seconds) will be collected at baseline and follow-up visits when available. Predictive results from the test are as follows: \<10s, Freely mobile; \< 20s, Mostly independent; 20-29s, Variable mobility.
Changes in mobility, balance, risk of falling, and walking ability as measured by TUG test with the C-Brace system compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting.
Primary Efficacy: Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Assessment of patient-perceived balance confidence for 16 activities of daily living. For each activity, subjects rate their level of confidence in doing the activity without losing their balance or becoming unsteady on a scale from 0% to 100%, with 100% being the highest level of confidence. The total score for the ABC scale is an average of all activity scores.
Changes in perceived balance confidence as assessed by the ABC score with the C-Brace system compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting.
Primary Safety: Frequency and severity of falling
The number and percentage of patients who experience one or more adverse events during their participation in the registry will be computed along with the exact 95% binomial confidence interval. The number and percentage of subjects who experience a serious adverse event will also be tabulated along with the exact 95% binomial confidence interval. Events will also be categorized and the number of events and number of patients for each category will be presented. In addition, a complete listing of adverse events along with their relationship to the device, severity, seriousness and outcome will be constructed.
Changes in numbers of device-related adverse events experienced by C Brace users by frequency and severity compared to baseline measurement when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Changes in patient-centered activities and in the defined activity performance with C-Brace by the PSFS compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting.
Activity Tracker
Changes of C-Brace utilization at 12 months compared to baseline measurement estimated by the activity tracker
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Changes in static and dynamic balance abilities as measured by the BBS compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after initial fitting with C-Brace.
Other Outcomes (4)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Reduction in joint, lower back, and limb pain as measured by the NPRS compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting with C-Brace.
Manual Muscle Test
Changes in muscle strength and function as measured by the Manual Muscle Test (MMT) compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after initial fitting.
EQ-5D-5L
Changes in health-related quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L with the C-Brace system compared to baseline when assessed 12 months after the initial fitting.
- +1 more other outcomes
Interventions
The C-Brace consists of individually fabricated thigh, calf and foot components. An ankle joint, unilateral or bilateral fitting, or an individual spring element connects the foot and calf components. The sensor system continuously measures the flexion of the knee joint and its angular acceleration. This allows the C-Brace to detect the user's current walking phase, so it can regulate the hydraulic resistances as well as control the flexion and extension of the knee joint.
Eligibility Criteria
As the purpose of the C-Brace Registry is to characterize safety and effectiveness data in a real-world setting, the inclusion and exclusion criteria are deliberately written as open as possible to allow all patients casted for a C-Brace fitting to be included as subjects in the registry. The indications and contraindications for the C-Brace are provided in the Instructions for Use and are based on clinical presentation, not on etiology. Clinical presentations will involve lower limb paresis that may be due to a variety of etiologies, including incomplete paraplegia, post-polio syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, traumatic brain injury and muscular sclerosis.
You may qualify if:
- Patient has been evaluated and successfully tested with the Trial Tool, and has been casted for a C-Brace.
- Patient is able to communicate, provide feedback, understand and follow instructions during the course of the registry.
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is geographically inaccessible to comply and participate in the registry.
- Patient has not been casted for a C-Brace fitting.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (76)
Jonesboro P&O x Ottobock.care
Harrison, Arkansas, 72601, United States
Jonesboro P&O x Ottobock.care
Rogers, Arkansas, 72758, United States
Bionics Orthotics & Prosthetics
San Diego, California, 92117, United States
ABI P&O
San Diego, California, 92120, United States
West Coast Brace & Limb - Palm Harbor
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
Hanger - Sarasota
Sarasota, Florida, 34233, United States
West Coast Brace & Limb - Tampa
Tampa, Florida, 33617, United States
ProCare Prosthetics x Ottobock.care
Buford, Georgia, 30518, United States
ProCare x Ottobock.care
Conyers, Georgia, 30094, United States
Scheck & Siress: A Hanger Clinic Company
Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States
P&O Care x Ottobock.care
Fairview Heights, Illinois, 62208, United States
Kenney Orthopedics - Evansville
Evansville, Indiana, 47715, United States
Prevail Prosthetics & Orthotics
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804, United States
Bionic Prosthetics & Orthotics
Merrillville, Indiana, 46410, United States
Kenney Orthopedics - Danville
Danville, Kentucky, 40422, United States
Kenney Orthopedics - Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503, United States
Ability x Ottobock.care
Frederick, Maryland, 21702, United States
Dankmeyer
Linthicum, Maryland, 21090, United States
Medical Center Orthotics & Prosthetics
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910, United States
Cornell Orthotics & Prosthetics
Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Flint, Michigan, 48504, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Lansing, Michigan, 48912, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Lapeer, Michigan, 48446, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Livonia, Michigan, 48150, United States
Wright & Filippis x Ottobock.care
Madison Heights, Michigan, 48071, United States
Limb Lab
Rochester, Minnesota, 55904, United States
P&O Care x Ottobock.care
St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States
Limb Lab
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106, United States
AlliedOP
Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 07410, United States
AlliedOP
Mount Laurel, New Jersey, 08054, United States
MedEast Post-op & Surgical
Mount Laurel, New Jersey, 08054, United States
Body in Motion
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755, United States
Raymond G. Murphy VA
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108, United States
Orthocraft Inc. - 3856 Flatlands Ave
Brooklyn, New York, 11234, United States
VA NY Harbor
Manhattan, New York, 10010, United States
Prosthetics in Motion
New York, New York, 10001, United States
Reliable P&O
Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28546, United States
Bionic Prosthetics & Orthotics
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645, United States
O&P of Pinehurst
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374, United States
Atlantic Prosthetic Services
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28412, United States
Yanke Bionics - W Exchange St
Akron, Ohio, 44302, United States
Western Reserve O&P
Austintown, Ohio, 44515, United States
Ability P&O x Ottobock.care
Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341, United States
Titleman Orthopedic
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19083, United States
elizur Corporation
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237, United States
Ability x Ottobock.care
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610, United States
Ability x Ottobock.care
York, Pennsylvania, 17401, United States
South County Artificial Limb and Brace
Wakefield, Rhode Island, 02879, United States
Carolina Ottobock.care
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Excel P&O
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
Restorative Health Services
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37129, United States
Ottobock.care
Austin, Texas, 78758, United States
New Life
Conroe, Texas, 77384, United States
Scott Sabolich Prosthetics & Research x Ottobock.care
Dallas, Texas, 75148, United States
Baker O&P
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Hanger Clinic - Houston
Houston, Texas, 77025, United States
Michael E. DeBakey VA
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
TIRR Research Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
South Texas Veterans Health Care System
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Freedom P & O - 356 E 600 S
St. George, Utah, 84770, United States
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
VA O&P
Roanoke, Virginia, 24012, United States
Cornerstone P&O
Everett, Washington, 98203, United States
Cascade Prosthetics & Orthotics
Ferndale, Washington, 98248, United States
Hanger Clinic - Renton
Renton, Washington, 98057, United States
Pacific Medical
Richland, Washington, 99352, United States
Thompson's O&P
Spokane, Washington, 99202, United States
Bionic Prosthetics & Orthotics
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301, United States
Neuromuscular-orthotics.com.au
Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
Pohlig BmbH
Traunstein, Bavaria, 83278, Germany
Ottobock Göttingen
Göttingen, Deutschland, 37075, Germany
John+Bamberg GmbH & Co. KG
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625, Germany
Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz-Montabaur
Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56073, Germany
Hyogo Rehabilitation Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, 651-2181, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Lundstrom RL, Klenow TD, Morris A, Pobatschnig B, Hibler KD, Kannenberg AH. The C-Brace(R) microprocessor controlled stance and swing orthosis improves safety, mobility, and quality of life at one year: Interim results from a prospective registry. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024 Aug 9;11:20556683241269539. doi: 10.1177/20556683241269539. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 39132469BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank Braatz, Prof.
Private University of Applied Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2020
First Posted
November 23, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share