NCT04638842

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an online Multi-component psychological intervention, that is focused on providing self-support to the Mexican population for the prevention of complicated grief disorder, by reducing grief and strengthening the capacities of the person to handle losses derived from COVID-19 as well as reducing the symptoms of anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and post-traumatic stress, and increasing the quality of sleep and perception of the quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 24, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 13, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 12, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Decrease in the scores of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) is a structured self-report scale for evaluation depression symptoms. This scale assesses the number of depression symptoms within 2 weeks. The scale consists 20 items and contains 4-point score responses (0 to 3) as the following; rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day); some of a little of the time (1-2 days); occasionally or moderate amount of time (3-4 days) and most or all of the time (5-7 days). The total possible range of scores is from 0 to 60 where \^16 is the cut-off point for this scale, and higher scores indicate more symptoms of depression. It is expected a statistically significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in depression symptoms.

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Change in the score of Anxiety Symptoms in the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 is a structured self-report scale that assesses the subscales of anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms over the past last week. Each subscale contains seven items with responses rated on a 4-point scale (0-3) as follows; 0 Did not apply at me at all; 1 Applied to me to a considerable degree or some of the time; 2 Applied to me to a considerable degree or a good part of the time; 3 Applied to me very much or most of the time. Each subscale has a cut-off point for depression (6), anxiety (5), and stress (6). It is expected a statistically significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in depression and anxiety symptoms.

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Decrease in the score of The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

    This instrument assesses the quality patterns of sleep. It differentiates the "poor" and "good" sleep by measuring seven areas, where the range score of answers are from 0 to 3, the global sum of this scale can be a value between 0 to 60, and the cutoff point is "5" that indicates a "poor" sleep quality. It is expected a statistically significant increase (P \< 0.05) in the Sleep Quality measure.

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Decrease in the scores of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale

    The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale is a 17-item structured interview. The severity over the last 2 weeks of each item on the PSS is rated by the interviewer using a 4-point scale: 0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, and 3 = very much. The maximum possible score is 51 (severely affected) and the minimum possible score is 0 (total absence of the symptoms). The total severity score is calculated as the sum of the severity ratings for the 17 items. The diagnosis of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale is made when at least 1 re-experiencing, 3 avoidance, and 2 arousal symptoms are endorsed on the scale by individuals who were traumatized at least one month prior to the assessment. It is expected a statistically significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in the patients suffering from this disorder.

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Increase in Satisfaction with Life Scale

    This instrument is composed of 5 items in which the participants must indicate how much they agree with each question, with an answer option in Likert format from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree), the scores range from a minimum from 5 to a maximum of 35, where the highest scores indicate greater satisfaction with life. This scale has been validated in the Mexican population, obtaining good results of internal consistency (α = 0.74).

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Decrease in the symptoms of General Anxiety Disorder

    On the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale subjects are asked how often, during the last 2 weeks, they have been bothered by each of the 7 core symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder. Response options are "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day," scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Therefore, GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 21, with scores of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 represent mild, moderate, and severe anxiety symptom levels, respectively. Is expected a statistically significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the General Anxiety symptoms.

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Decrease in the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

  • Decrease in Grief symptoms

    1.5 to 2 months, depending on the development of the patient and the completion of the 12 modules

Study Arms (2)

Grief COVID intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will receive 12 sessions of a multi-component psychological intervention focused on the reduction of symptoms of anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and post-traumatic stress, and the increase of the quality of sleep and perception of the quality of life.

Behavioral: Online Intervention Grief COVID-19

Waiting List group

NO INTERVENTION

The participants in this group will not receive the treatment, just waiting list. They will be measured one time and then a second time 3 months after. Calculating when 3 months corresponding to 12 sessions will receive the intervention.

Interventions

The online Intervention Grief COVID-19 aims to provide to the target population a self-applied intervention based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mindfulness, Behavioral Activation Therapy, and Positive Psychology, aimed at the Psychoeducation regarding the manifestations of normal grief, advice and guidance on how to find emotional relief, with the aim that survivors allow themselves to validate their experience of emotional pain and recognize it as a normal part of their process of adaptation to loss, what does grief deprived of rights consist of, specifically from the contingency of COVID-19, establish self-care measures for people in different areas of their life (physical, emotional, cognitive and spiritual), direct the survivor to relocate the died in his life without his memory causing suffering, in addition to beginning to resume his life project, adjusting according to his needs and goals. The sessions will be delivered in a frequency of one session every three days.

Grief COVID intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • To have access to a communication device with access to the internet (computer, tablet, and mobile).
  • To have a valid email address.
  • To have basic digital skills in the use of an operational system and internet browsing.
  • To understand Spanish since all the contents are in this language.
  • Having suffered the loss of a loved one in a period of no less than 3 months and no longer than 6 months.
  • Symptoms of General Anxiety Disorder and/or Depression and/or, grief symptoms.

You may not qualify if:

  • To have a diagnosis of psychotic disorder
  • To be receiving psychological and/or pharmacological treatment during the study
  • Moderate to high score on the suicide scale
  • Recent attempt of suicide (3 months)
  • Symptoms of posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Juárez, Chihuahua, 32315, Mexico

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Wallace CL, Wladkowski SP, Gibson A, White P. Grief During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Palliative Care Providers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e70-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

    PMID: 32298748BACKGROUND
  • Holland DE, Vanderboom CE, Dose AM, Moore D, Robinson KV, Wild E, Stiles C, Ingram C, Mandrekar J, Borah B, Taylor E, Griffin JM. Death and Grieving for Family Caregivers of Loved Ones With Life-Limiting Illnesses in the Era of COVID-19: Considerations for Case Managers. Prof Case Manag. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;26(2):53-61. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000485.

    PMID: 33181608BACKGROUND
  • Mayland CR, Harding AJE, Preston N, Payne S. Supporting Adults Bereaved Through COVID-19: A Rapid Review of the Impact of Previous Pandemics on Grief and Bereavement. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e33-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 May 15.

    PMID: 32416233BACKGROUND
  • Boelen PA, Prigerson HG. The influence of symptoms of prolonged grief disorder, depression, and anxiety on quality of life among bereaved adults: a prospective study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Dec;257(8):444-52. doi: 10.1007/s00406-007-0744-0.

    PMID: 17629728BACKGROUND
  • Boelen PA, Smid GE. Disturbed grief: prolonged grief disorder and persistent complex bereavement disorder. BMJ. 2017 May 18;357:j2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2016. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28522468BACKGROUND
  • Sauer J, Sonderegger A, Schmutz S. Usability, user experience and accessibility: towards an integrative model. Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1207-1220. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1774080. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

    PMID: 32450782BACKGROUND
  • Merino MD, Privado J. Positive Psychological Functioning. Evidence for a new construct and its measurement.[Funcionamiento psicológico positivo. Evidencia para un nuevo constructo y su medición]. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology. 2015;31(1):45-54.

    BACKGROUND
  • Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, Perry K. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological assessment. 1997 Dec;9(4):445.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kersting A, Dolemeyer R, Steinig J, Walter F, Kroker K, Baust K, Wagner B. Brief Internet-based intervention reduces posttraumatic stress and prolonged grief in parents after the loss of a child during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(6):372-81. doi: 10.1159/000348713. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

    PMID: 24061387BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann R, Grosse J, Nagl M, Niederwieser D, Mehnert A, Kersting A. Internet-based grief therapy for bereaved individuals after loss due to Haematological cancer: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1633-y.

    PMID: 29482525BACKGROUND
  • Sogaard Neilsen A, Wilson RL. Combining e-mental health intervention development with human computer interaction (HCI) design to enhance technology-facilitated recovery for people with depression and/or anxiety conditions: An integrative literature review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(1):22-39. doi: 10.1111/inm.12527. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

    PMID: 30133096BACKGROUND
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

  • Carleton RN, Thibodeau MA, Teale MJ, Welch PG, Abrams MP, Robinson T, Asmundson GJ. The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: a review with a theoretical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058067. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

  • Norton PJ. Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007 Sep;20(3):253-65. doi: 10.1080/10615800701309279.

  • Koslowsky M, Bleich A, Greenspoon A, Wagner B, Apter A, Solomon Z. Assessing the validity of the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale. J Psychiatr Res. 1991;25(4):155-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(91)90019-7.

  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

  • Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Dec;42(6):861-5. doi: 10.1037/h0037562. No abstract available.

  • Novy DM, Stanley MA, Averill P, Daza P. Psychometric comparability of English- and Spanish-language measures of anxiety and related affective symptoms. Psychol Assess. 2001 Sep;13(3):347-55. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.3.347.

  • Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Sanz-Gomez S, Gonzalez Ramirez LP, Herdoiza-Arroyo PE, Trevino Garcia LE, de la Rosa-Gomez A, Gonzalez-Cantero JO, Macias-Aguinaga V, Miaja M. The Efficacy and Usability of an Unguided Web-Based Grief Intervention for Adults Who Lost a Loved One During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43839. doi: 10.2196/43839.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersDepressionParasomnias

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorSleep Wake DisordersNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sofía Cristina Martínez Luna, MD

    Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Paulina Arenas Landgrave, PhD

    Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Anabel de la Rosa, Gómez

    Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Esteban Eugenio Esquivel Santoveña, PhD

    Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Rosa Olimpia Castellanos Vargas, MD

    Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Luis Farfallini, PhD

    University of Buenos Aires

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The patients are not aware that there is an experimental group and a control group, the participants are not related and do not know each other. The conditions of the study are only known by the researcher, the therapists, and the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study has two arms, one is the experimental group that receives the treatment and the other is the comparison group that will receive treatment after the 12 sessions of the experimental group finished. The patients in both groups will be evaluated pre and post/treatment. The participants are assigned randomly to the intervention or comparison group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2020

First Posted

November 20, 2020

Study Start

December 24, 2020

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

October 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The information will be available in a private server or in a server of the journal(s) that we will publish the articles that will be the result of this study. The protocol of the study is currently in progress to be published, in this article will be included such study protocol, the informed consent is already shared in the register of clinical trials.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
This data will be available approximately in April 2021 and it will be permanently available. It will be shared in the databases of the journal where the article(s) will be published.
Access Criteria
Through the servers of the journal(s) where we will publish the articles.

Locations