NCT04634123|Completed
The Use of Portland Cement in Primary Anterior Teeth Pulpotomy.
Evaluation Using of White Portland Cement and MTA in Pulpotomy Primary Anterior Teeth
Loading search results
Evaluation Using of White Portland Cement and MTA in Pulpotomy Primary Anterior Teeth
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)\- The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of White Portland cement and MTA in primary anterior teeth pulpotomy and follow up after 3 , 6 , 12 months ( Clinically and Radiographically) : Group A ( Control group ) : primary anterior teeth pulpotomized by White MTA . Group B : primary anterior teeth pulpotomized by White Portland Cement . \- The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of White Portland cement and MTA in pulpotomy primary canines for serial extraction and extract them after 3 months for Histopathlogic study : Group A ( Control group ) : primary canines pulpotomized by White MTA . Group B : primary canines pulpotomized by White Portland Cement .
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 31, 2020
Actual (reported)April 1, 2020
Actual (reported)November 18, 2020
Actual (reported)November 30, 2020
Actual (reported)July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 3 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
3 months
Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 6 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 6 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
6 months
Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 12 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 12 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
12 months
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 3 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
Carious asymptomatic primary anterior teeth will be removed of dental caries likely to produce vital pulp exposure . The access will be refined using a sterile no. 4 or 6 round bur in a slow-speed handpiece . The remaining pulp will be treated using pulpotomy therapy by White Portland Cement
Carious asymptomatic primary anterior teeth will be removed of dental caries likely to produce vital pulp exposure . The access will be refined usinga sterile no. 4 or 6 round bur in a slow-speed handpiece . The remaining pulp will be treated using pulpotomy therapy by White MTA
Damascus Universite
Damascus, Syria
Nguyen TD, Judd PL, Barrett EJ, Sidhu N, Casas MJ. Comparison of Ferric Sulfate Combined Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Pulpectomy of Primary Maxillary Incisors: An 18-month Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan 15;39(1):34-38.
Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB. A clinical study of formocresol pulpotomy versus root canal therapy of vital primary incisors. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Spring;32(3):211-4. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.32.3.ghk26v4554790074.
Hasan M Alzoubi, DDs
MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus
Nada G Bshara, Phd
Professor of Pedodontics, Department of Pedodontics, University of Damascus
35 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
January 31, 2020
First Posted
November 18, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Formocresol in Primary Molar Pulpotomies
3 months
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 6 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies was performed 6 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
6 months
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 12 months after treatment
Clinical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies was performed 12 months after treatment using the preset clinical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a clinical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) No pain, (2) No swelling, (3) No tenderness to percussion, (4) No abscess or fistula, and (5) No abnormal tooth mobility
12 months
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 3 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
3 months
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 6 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 6 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
6 months
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies 12 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 12 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
12 months
Radiographic evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 3 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White MTAt pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
3 months
Radiographic evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 6 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White MTAt pulpotomies was performed 6 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
6 months
Radiographic evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies 12 months after treatment
Radiographic evaluation of White MTAt pulpotomies was performed 12 months after treatment using periapical radiographs. The pulpotomized tooth was judged to be radiographically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: (1) Normal periodontal ligament space (2) No periapical and furcation pathosis, and (3) No internal resorption. If pulp canal obliteration (PCO) happened, it was recorded but not considered as a treatment failure
12 months
Histopathlogic evaluation of White Portland Cement 3 months after treatment
Histopathlogical evaluation of White Portland Cement pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using the preset histopathlogical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a histopathlogical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) Normal soft tissue, (2) Formulation dentin bridge, (3) Normal bleeding from pulp tissue, (4) No fibrosis, and (5) No pulp calcification
3 months
Histopathlogic evaluation of White MTA 3 months after treatment
Histopathlogical evaluation of White MTA pulpotomies was performed 3 months after treatment using the preset histopathlogical criteria. The pulpotomy procedure was decided a histopathlogical success if the tooth fulfilled the following criteria: (1) Normal soft tissue, (2) Formulation dentin bridge, (3) Normal bleeding from pulp tissue, (4) No fibrosis, and (5) No pulp calcification
3 months
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL, Layug MA. Outcomes of vital primary incisor ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Jan;70(1):34-8.
Howley B, Seale NS, McWhorter AG, Kerins C, Boozer KB, Lindsey D. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy for carious vital primary incisors: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):112-9.
Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the root-end sealing ability of MTA and Portland cement. Aust Endod J. 2005 Aug;31(2):59-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00223.x.
Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
December 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: