NCT04626999

Brief Summary

The prevalence of ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) ruptures is relatively high, primarily due to sports and military training injuries. With the advancements of ACL reconstruction therapies, there exist two ways to reconstruct ACL: single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SBACLR) and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DBACLR). Previous research studies claimed that DBACLR techniques are superior to that of SBACLR, while others stated no notable differences between the two. The variables assessed in previous studies are findings related to the clinical instabilities of the knees (both subjective nor objectives views) and standard radiology examination, such as Xray or MRI. Knee instabilities are the primary goal of ACL reconstructions. Hence this study focuses on finding the dissimilarities between the two previously mentioned techniques by observing the early consequences (subclinically) of knee instabilities towards cartilage damage. The dissimilarities assessments utilize biomolecular tests (ELISA) of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) on synovial joint fluid of the knee and knee joint cartilage examination using MRI T2 mapping. Furthermore, there will be a stability (biomechanical) check of the knee joint in the form of a Lachman test, a pivot shift test, and a Rolimeter. This study requires around 47-52 subjects divided into two operation techniques of SBACLR and DBACLR. To evaluate the results from COMP, MRI T2 mapping, Lachman test, pivot shift test, and Rolimeter, this study is divided into three timeframes: before an operation, three months after post-operation, and six months post-operations. The differences between the test variables are then used as an indicator to assess the cartilage conditions from two operation techniques: SBACLR and DBACLR. Subsequently, the study also examines the possible correlation of each of the resulting variables.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 8, 2018

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 8, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

knee instabilityanterior cruciate ligament rupturecartilage damageSingle Bundle ACL ReconstructionDouble Bundle ACL ReconstructionCOMP (Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein)MRI T2 Mapping

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Changes of Synovial fluid Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (sfCOMP) Concentration from Baseline to 3 months and 6 months

    Sample will be taken from Synovial fluid and and send to laboratory for checking the concentration (ng/mL) of COMP using ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kits.

    0,3,6 months

  • Changes of MRI T2 Mapping colour from Baseline to 3 months and 6 months

    The cartilage of the affected knee will be checked using MRI T2 Mapping and the resulting color will be quantitatively assessed in seconds.

    0,3,6 months

  • Changes of Lachman test score from baseline to 3 months and 6 months

    Anterior instability on the affected knee will be checked using the Lachman test and the score is recorded in millimeter (mm).

    0,3,6 months

  • Changes of Pivot shift test score from baseline to 3 months and 6 months

    Rotatory instability on the affected knee will be checked using the Pivot shift test and the score is recorded in +1, +2, +3.

    0,3,6 months

  • Changes of Rolimeter measurement score from baseline to 3 months and 6 months

    Anterior instability on the affected knee will be checked using the Rolimeter tools and the measurement is recorded in millimeter (mm).

    0,3,6 months

Study Arms (3)

Synovial fluid COMP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Knee joint fluid is aspirated for ELISA COMP examination

Procedure: Single Bundle ACL ReconstructionProcedure: Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction

MRI T2 Mapping

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Affected knee is subjected to an MRI T2 mapping examination to see the condition of cartilage

Procedure: Single Bundle ACL ReconstructionProcedure: Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Instability Examination

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lachmant Test, Pivot shift test and Rolimeter Measurement

Procedure: Single Bundle ACL ReconstructionProcedure: Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Interventions

Arthroscopy Single Bundle ACL Reconstruction is a procedure to reconstruct the ACL using one bundle. The procedure uses Hamstring (Gracillis muscle and Semitendinosus muscle) as a graft.

Instability ExaminationMRI T2 MappingSynovial fluid COMP

Arthroscopy Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction is a procedure to reconstruct the ACL using Two bundles (Double bundle). The procedure uses Gracillis tendon as a Posterolateral bundle graft and Semitendinosus tendon as an Anteromedial bundle graft.

Instability ExaminationMRI T2 MappingSynovial fluid COMP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male
  • Age 18-40 years
  • Total primary ACL rupture
  • Injury time 1-12 months
  • Willingness to attend the study
  • Signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects having other ligament injuries in the knee
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe osteoarthritis Kellgren-Lawrence grading\> 2
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25
  • Fracture around the knee joint or osteochondral avulsion
  • History of injury with either or both semitendinosus or gracilis muscle, patellofemoral instability, contraindication of anesthesia, and partial ACL rupture.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesPseudoachondroplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Knee InjuriesLeg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Bobby N Nelwan, MD

    Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ismail H Dilogo, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Faculty of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2020

First Posted

November 13, 2020

Study Start

January 8, 2018

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations