GaitBetter: Motor and Cognitive Training for Gait Rehabilitation and Falls Prevention in Stroke Survivors.
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this research study, the investigators aim to test the usability and efficacy of the GaitBetter system for gait rehabilitation after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedApril 2, 2026
March 1, 2026
4.8 years
October 27, 2020
March 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
10 meter walk test (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Evaluation of gait speed of chronic stroke survivors, in meters per second
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
10 meter walk test (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Evaluation of gait speed of subacute stroke survivors, in meters per second
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Trail making test (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Evaluation of cognition status, in chronic stroke survivors. The test record the time to accomplish the task (higher values indicate slower performance)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Trail making test (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Evaluation of cognition status, in subacute stroke survivors. The test record the time to accomplish the task (higher values indicate slower performance)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest, in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Comprehensive evaluation of balance and falls risks in chronic stroke survivors. Score from 0 to 108. Higher scores are reflecting better balance
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Aim 3: Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest, in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Comprehensive evaluation of balance and falls risks in subacute stroke survivors. Score from 0 to108. Higher scores are reflecting better balance
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Step length (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step length (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step width (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step width (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step symmetry (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (12)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Aim 2: Efficacy of the GaitBetter to improve motor-cognitive function of chronic stroke survivors
EXPERIMENTALThe investigators propose a single-arm, non-randomized study to test the hypothesis that the GaitBetter training is effective in improving gait and cognition in individuals with chronic stroke. This design was chosen given the expected stability of functional recovery in this population.
Aim 3: Efficacy of the GaitBetter to improve rehabilitation outcomes in sub-acute stroke survivors
EXPERIMENTALThe investigators propose a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of using the GaitBetter system in patients with subacute stroke on recovery trajectory.
Interventions
Participants will receive gait training with the GaitBetter solution for a total of 15 sessions (3 days a week for 5 weeks) each lasting approximately 45 minutes.
Participants will receive gait training with the GaitBetter solution for a total of 15 sessions (3 days a week for 5 weeks) each lasting approximately 45 minutes. In addition, the investigators will record the number and duration of therapy sessions followed by the participant during standard of care.
Participants will follow their standard of care. The investigators will record the number and duration of therapy sessions followed during standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and females of age between 18 to 85 year of age
- History of one-sided ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Chronic: more than 6 months post-stroke (Aim 1 and Aim 2)
- Subacute: within 8 weeks post-stroke (Aim 1 and Aim 3)
- Residual functional impairment of a lower extremity as a result of the stroke
- Ability to walk at least 15 meters with or without assistive devices (FIM walk subsection, levels 6 and 7)
- Ability to walk 3 consecutive minutes (5 minutes for Aim 2) on a treadmill at a speed equal to or greater than 0.22 m/s (0.8 km/h or 0.5 mph) with or without hand support.
- Medical clearance received from treating physician to participate in the gait training program proposed in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Severe aphasia limiting the ability to express needs or discomfort verbally or non-verbally
- Cognitive impairment limiting the ability to understand and follow instructions (as assessed by a score \<23 on the Mini Mental State Examination)
- Previous diagnosis of neurological diseases other than stroke
- Recent history of lower extremity fractures (\<12 months ago), unhealed wounds
- Current indication for isolation precautions (e.g. MRSA, VRE, C. difficile, and others)
- Severe visual impairments (as assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale Visual Field subscale. score \>0)
- Hemispatial neglect (as assessed by the Line Bisection Test)
- Subjects diagnosed with a medical condition that would interfere with their participation in regular sustained exercise (such as a severe pulmonary and/or cardiovascular condition)
- For Aim 2: currently participating in a gait training intervention (PT or research)
- Adults with impaired decision-making capacity
- Women who are pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospitallead
- GoldenGait LTDcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paolo Bonato, PhD
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Director of the Motion Analysis Laboratory
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2020
First Posted
November 12, 2020
Study Start
July 23, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share