Study Stopped
The robot was no longer available to the study.
Usability Testing of Affordable Haptic Robots for Stroke Therapy
Theradrive
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke survivors with hemiplegia will be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals and asked to perform a battery of assessments to test the viability and usability of a force-feedback robot that adapts to each individual subject's performance. Subsequently, they will be asked to complete post-assessment questionnaires that provide feedback to the researchers on their observations and thoughts about the therapy devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2020
CompletedSeptember 4, 2020
September 1, 2020
3.3 years
March 29, 2016
March 23, 2020
September 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Fugl Meyer
The primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired.
At 0 weeks
Box and Blocks
Measures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function
At Session 0. Pre-intervention
Tracking Accuracy
Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance.
At Session 0
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Grip Strength
pre-intervention
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
pre-intervention
Becks Depression Scale
Pre-intervention
Study Arms (1)
Stroke survivors with low and moderate motor deficits
OTHERSubjects with low and moderate motor deficits will 1) complete exercises with 2 commercial (joystick and wheel) and the Theradrive haptic robot after pre assessment 2) then experience 12 therapy sessions on the Theradrive haptic robot with Adaptive Feedback. 3) Assessments pre and post therapy.
Interventions
Commercial Joystick and Wheels Plus the Haptic TheraDrive Robot will be used. Haptic Theradrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stroke survivors at least 18 years of age with hemiplegia.
- The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.
- Low and Moderate functioning stroke survivors as measured by Fugl- Meyer
- Not depressed
- No more than Mild Cognitive Deficit
- Participants must be able to sit upright for 4 hours at a time in Part A of the study; and 2 hours at a time, 3 days a week, for Part B of the study.
- The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Greater than mild cognitive deficits
- Greater than mild depression. A member of the research team will administer Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) to each study participant over the phone. If the participant is found to have greater than mild depression, as measured by the BDI, they will not qualify for the study.
- Receiving rehabilitation on the upper limb.
- Received Botox injections within the past 3 months.
- Suffering from contractures (chronic loss of joint motion) or debilitating spasticity in the upper extremity.
- Experiencing greater than mild pain, and/or the PI determines that the participant should no longer continue working with the novel therapy devices, the study will be stopped.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Penn Medicine Rittenhouse
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Related Publications (3)
Ruparel R, Johnson MJ, Strachota E, McGuire J, Tchekanov G. Evaluation of the TheraDrive system for robot/computer assisted motivating rehabilitation after stroke. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:811-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332386.
PMID: 19963475BACKGROUNDJohnson MJ, Ramachandran B, Paranjape RP, Kosasih JB. Feasibility study of TheraDrive: a low-cost game-based environment for the delivery of upper arm stroke therapy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:695-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259971.
PMID: 17946851BACKGROUNDTheriault A, Nagurka M, Johnson MJ. Design and development of an affordable haptic robot with force-feedback and compliant actuation to improve therapy for patients with severe hemiparesis. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):161-74. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.51.
PMID: 24968380BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle J Johnson
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle J Johnson, PhD
PENN MEDICINE RITTENHOUSE
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2016
First Posted
May 16, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Results First Posted
September 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share