Live Birth Rate in Patients With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Comparing the Live Birth Rate of Preimplantation Genetic Screening Versus Spontaneous Pregnancy in Patients With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
STUDY AIM: to study the pregnancy outcomes and offspring development of patient with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Treated by PGS and spontaneous pregnancy, and to compare the health economic indicators and patient satisfaction of the two modes of pregnancy, so as to better guide the clinical treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 9, 2020
November 1, 2020
3 years
November 5, 2020
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Live birth rate
the rate of the birth of a living fetus
2 years of following up
Study Arms (2)
PGS(Preimplantation Genetic Screening)
patients with two times or more unexplained pregnancy loss, who wants to be pregnant via preimplantation genetic screening procedure
SP(spontaneous pregnancy )
patients with two times or more unexplained pregnancy loss, who wants to be pregnant via spontaneous pregnancy.
Interventions
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was developed in the late 1980s as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis for couples at risk of transmitting a genetic or chromosomal abnormality to their children. In embryos created through in vitro fertilisation (IVF), cells are biopsied and analysed using genetic tests such as polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH).
Eligibility Criteria
patients who seek treatment in our Recurrent Pregnancy Loss clinic.
You may qualify if:
- patients with two times or more unexplained pregnancy loss(less than 24 weeks of gestational age, biochemical pregnancy excluded), who wants to be pregnant via preimplantation genetic screening procedure or spontaneous pregnancy.
You may not qualify if:
- anatomic abnormality of the reproductive system; endocrine metabolic disease; autoimmune related disease; chromosomal abnormalities; hydrosalpinx; cervical insufficiency.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Haidian, 100191, China
Related Publications (1)
Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1668-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew135. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PMID: 27278003BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rong Li, M.D.
Center of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2020
First Posted
November 9, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share