The OPENS Trial: Offering Women PrEP (Aim 1)
Offering Women PrEP With Education and Shared Decision-making
2 other identifiers
interventional
189
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To address the significant barriers to PrEP implementation for those who were assigned female at birth and self-identify as a woman and address racial inequities in HIV prevention in the United States (US), a novel approach that accounts for multilevel influences is necessary. This study is one part of a multi-component project and involves a patient-level intervention in one public health family planning clinic in Duval County Florida, where the majority of patients are women of color. The area has one of the highest HIV incidence rates among women in the US. The investigators developed a tablet-based decision support tool that helps users learn about HIV vulnerabilities and HIV prevention strategies to inform how they consider options for reducing their likelihood of acquiring HIV. Participants will be randomized to use the HIV decision support tool before their visit or standard counseling (without the use of the tool) and will be surveyed about the use of the tool, experiences with HIV prevention counseling, and intentions about the use of HIV prevention. A subset of participants, all individuals who self-identify as a woman and as Black or Latina, will also complete a post-clinic visit interview. The investigators will follow-up with participants at three months following their initial visit to see if they have initiated the HIV prevention method(s) they chose at their visit. The main outcomes will include a quantitative and qualitative assessment of PrEP or other HIV prevention use, decisional certainty, and satisfaction with information about HIV prevention options. Hypotheses:
- 1.Women who use the HIV prevention decision support tool will be more likely to have initiated PrEP within 3 months compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
- 2.The HIV prevention decision support tool will increase women's knowledge of PrEP and other HIV prevention methods compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
- 3.The HIV prevention decision support tool will increase participants' decisional certainty in their choice of an HIV prevention method compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 4, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2024
CompletedMay 20, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.5 years
October 9, 2020
April 23, 2024
April 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PrEP Prescriptions (As Measured by Chart Review)
The number of participants who received a PrEP prescription within 3 months of their baseline visit, obtained by chart extraction from the medical record. Outcome is dichotomous (Yes, received a PrEP prescription /No, did not receive a PrEP prescription).
3 months post baseline visit
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Number of Patients Reporting PrEP Use
3 months post baseline visit
Change in Patient-Perceived HIV Risk
Baseline, pre-intervention compared to immediately post baseline visit
Patient-Perceived HIV Risk
Immediately post baseline visit
PrEP Knowledge
Immediately post baseline visit
Decisional Conflict - Total Score
Immediately post baseline visit
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HIV Prevention DST Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive the HIV prevention DST intervention and will receive the intervention immediately before their provider visit.
Standard Counseling
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will receive usual care.
Interventions
The tool is founded on principles of decision-science and developed in a systematic manner including pilot testing. The tool will present HIV prevention information through a tablet in the clinical setting. The decision support tool will address barriers to PrEP delivery, including 1) limited client knowledge about PrEP, 2) limited time to educate patients in busy clinics, 3) women's lack of knowledge of their own HIV vulnerability, and 4) hesitancy of women to initiate discussions about PrEP with providers due to judgmental attitudes and stigma. Also, the tool emphasizes the highly variable and individual nature of baseline risk.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-identify as a woman (regardless of pregnancy status)
- Age 18 - 45 years
- Not known to be living with HIV (based on self-report)
- English-speaking
- Interested in participating
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to consent
- Currently using PrEP
- Those who were assigned male at birth and self-identify as a man
- Unwilling to be contacted in 3 months
- Already participated in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Florida Department of Health in Duval County
Jacksonville, Florida, 32211, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
COVID-19 disrupted normal clinic operations, including limiting HIV/PrEP counseling, and paused a state-wide PrEP campaign for cisgender women. This study was conducted at a single, publicly funded clinic with few providers and recruited primarily English-speaking participants and is not generalizeable to other populations. Further, there were too few participants who identified as non-cisgender women or reported injection drug use to report on experiences of those populations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Dominika Seidman
- Organization
- University of California, San-Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christine Dehlendorf, MD
University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Akilah Pope, MD
Florida Department of Health in Duval County
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2020
First Posted
November 9, 2020
Study Start
May 3, 2021
Primary Completion
October 24, 2022
Study Completion
November 4, 2022
Last Updated
May 20, 2024
Results First Posted
May 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share