TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION (t-DCS) AS ADD-ON TO NEUROREHABILITATION OF PISA SYNDROME IN PARKINSON DISEASE
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pisa Syndrome (PS) is a lateral trunk flexion frequently associated to Parkinson's disease (PD). The management of PS is still a challenge for the clinician, because it poorly responds to anti-parkinsonian drugs, and the improvement achieved with neurorehabilitation or botulinum toxin injections tends to fade in 6 months or less. Transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, with promising results in movement disorders. Aim of our study is to evaluate the role of bi-hemispheric t-DCS as add-on to neurorehabilitation in PS. Twenty-eight patients affected by PD and PS were managed with a 4-week hospital neurorehabilitation programme and randomized to: 1) t-DCS group: 5 daily sessions (20 minutes - 2 mA) with cathode over the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to PS, and anode over the M1 cortex ipsilateral to PS; or 2) sham group. Patients were tested with kinematic analysis of trunk movement in static and dynamic conditions, UPDRS-III, FIM, and VAS for lumbar pain rating at hospital admission (T0), at hospital discharge (end of neurorehabilitation - T1), and 6 months later (T2). At T0, the evaluations were completed by an EMG study of trunk muscles activation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2020
CompletedNovember 13, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.6 years
October 26, 2020
November 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Stat Tot (Stat Bend + Stat Flex)
Total postural alteration in the upright standing position (Stat Tot): lateral trunk inclination in the upright standing position (Stat Bend) plus anterior trunk flexion in the upright standing position (Stat Flex).
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change of Stat Bend
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
Change of Stat Flex
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
Change of ROM Ips
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
Change of ROM Con
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
Change of ROM flex
Change from Baseline at 28 weeks (T2)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
tDCS group
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the experimental group were treated with the following parameters: duration of stimulation of 20 minutes per session with a 2 mA intensity delivered at anodal and cathodal levels.
Sham Group
SHAM COMPARATORThe stimulation setting was exactly the same of the experimental group but the stimulation intensity was set according to a ramping up/ramping down method and delivered only in the first and last 30 seconds of each session. This stimulation paradigm is insufficient to produce a meaningful therapeutic effect, but it is necessary to guarantee the blind condition as it mimics the possible initial tingling sensation associated with active stimulation.
Interventions
All the participants received daily stimulation sessions for 5 consecutive days, starting from the first Monday after hospital admission (Monday to Friday). The primary motor cortex (M1) was identified using the International 10-20 system for C3 (left M1) or C4 (right M1). For the stimulation, the anode was placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) ipsilateral to the side of trunk deviation, and the cathode was placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the side of trunk deviation (bi-hemispheric stimulation).
The stimulation setting was exactly the same but the stimulation intensity was set according to a ramping up/ramping down method and delivered only in the first and last 30 seconds of each session. This stimulation paradigm is insufficient to produce a meaningful therapeutic effect, but it is necessary to guarantee the blind condition as it mimics the possible initial tingling sensation associated with active stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 80 years;
- Hoehn and Yahr stage between II and III;
- Mini-Mental State Examination score above 24;
- lateral trunk flexion of at least 10° at baseline.
You may not qualify if:
- history of major psychiatric or other neurological conditions;
- history of back surgery, tumors or infections of the spine, intradural or extradural hematoma, ankylosing spondylitis, spinal stenosis;
- history of idiopathic scoliosis;
- botulin toxin treatment in the previous year;
- any change in dose or regimen of the anti-parkinsonian therapy in the last month before enrolment.
- Thirty patients affected by Parkinson' Disease (PD) and Pisa Syndrome (PS) were consecutive enrolled among those attending the Neurorehabilitation Department of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy). Idiopathic PD was diagnosed according to the Movement Disorders Society clinical diagnostic criteria for PD. Pisa syndrome was clinically diagnosed according to the following criteria:
- a lateral flexion of the trunk with a homogenous angle between sacrum and spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra;
- an ipsilateral axial rotation of the trunk around the sagittal axis, that leads to a higher and anterior position of the shoulder contralateral to the side of trunk deviation;
- the worsening of the postural disorder during standing position, sitting position and gait;
- the improvement of the postural disorder in supine position.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neurorehabilitation Department
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Related Publications (19)
Ekbom K, Lindholm H, Ljungberg L. New dystonic syndrome associated with butyrophenone therapy. Z Neurol. 1972;202(2):94-103. doi: 10.1007/BF00316159. No abstract available.
PMID: 4115928BACKGROUNDGambarin M, Antonini A, Moretto G, Bovi P, Romito S, Fiaschi A, Tinazzi M. Pisa syndrome without neuroleptic exposure in a patient with Parkinson's disease: case report. Mov Disord. 2006 Feb;21(2):270-3. doi: 10.1002/mds.20711.
PMID: 16161148BACKGROUNDBarone P, Santangelo G, Amboni M, Pellecchia MT, Vitale C. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1063-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30173-9. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PMID: 27571158BACKGROUNDTinazzi M, Gandolfi M, Ceravolo R, Capecci M, Andrenelli E, Ceravolo MG, Bonanni L, Onofrj M, Vitale M, Catalan M, Polverino P, Bertolotti C, Mazzucchi S, Giannoni S, Smania N, Tamburin S, Vacca L, Stocchi F, Radicati FG, Artusi CA, Zibetti M, Lopiano L, Fasano A, Geroin C. Postural Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease: An Epidemiological and Clinical Multicenter Study. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019 Jun 29;6(7):576-585. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12810. eCollection 2019 Sep.
PMID: 31538092BACKGROUNDTinazzi M, Fasano A, Geroin C, Morgante F, Ceravolo R, Rossi S, Thomas A, Fabbrini G, Bentivoglio A, Tamma F, Cossu G, Modugno N, Zappia M, Volonte MA, Dallocchio C, Abbruzzese G, Pacchetti C, Marconi R, Defazio G, Canesi M, Cannas A, Pisani A, Mirandola R, Barone P, Vitale C; Italian Pisa Syndrome Study Group. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson disease: An observational multicenter Italian study. Neurology. 2015 Nov 17;85(20):1769-79. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002122. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PMID: 26491088BACKGROUNDTassorelli C, Furnari A, Buscone S, Alfonsi E, Pacchetti C, Zangaglia R, Pichiecchio A, Bastianello S, Lozza A, Allena M, Bolla M, Sandrini G, Nappi G, Martignoni E. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: clinical, electromyographic, and radiological characterization. Mov Disord. 2012 Feb;27(2):227-35. doi: 10.1002/mds.23930. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
PMID: 21997192BACKGROUNDDoherty KM, Davagnanam I, Molloy S, Silveira-Moriyama L, Lees AJ. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: a mobile or fixed deformity? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;84(12):1400-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304700. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23532719BACKGROUNDBonanni L, Thomas A, Varanese S, Scorrano V, Onofrj M. Botulinum toxin treatment of lateral axial dystonia in Parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2007 Oct 31;22(14):2097-103. doi: 10.1002/mds.21694.
PMID: 17685467BACKGROUNDEtoom M, Alwardat M, Aburub AS, Lena F, Fabbrizo R, Modugno N, Centonze D. Therapeutic interventions for Pisa syndrome in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. A Scoping Systematic Review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106242. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106242. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
PMID: 32979681BACKGROUNDTinazzi M, Geroin C, Gandolfi M, Smania N, Tamburin S, Morgante F, Fasano A. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: An integrated approach from pathophysiology to management. Mov Disord. 2016 Dec;31(12):1785-1795. doi: 10.1002/mds.26829. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PMID: 27779784BACKGROUNDTassorelli C, De Icco R, Alfonsi E, Bartolo M, Serrao M, Avenali M, De Paoli I, Conte C, Pozzi NG, Bramanti P, Nappi G, Sandrini G. Botulinum toxin type A potentiates the effect of neuromotor rehabilitation of Pisa syndrome in Parkinson disease: a placebo controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Nov;20(11):1140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
PMID: 25175601BACKGROUNDCastrioto A, Piscicelli C, Perennou D, Krack P, Debu B. The pathogenesis of Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2014 Aug;29(9):1100-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.25925. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
PMID: 24909134BACKGROUNDDi Matteo A, Fasano A, Squintani G, Ricciardi L, Bovi T, Fiaschi A, Barone P, Tinazzi M. Lateral trunk flexion in Parkinson's disease: EMG features disclose two different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. J Neurol. 2011 May;258(5):740-5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5822-y. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
PMID: 21079986BACKGROUNDTinazzi M, Juergenson I, Squintani G, Vattemi G, Montemezzi S, Censi D, Barone P, Bovi T, Fasano A. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: an electrophysiological and imaging study. J Neurol. 2013 Aug;260(8):2138-48. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6945-8. Epub 2013 May 22.
PMID: 23695587BACKGROUNDBartolo M, Serrao M, Tassorelli C, Don R, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Pacchetti C, Buscone S, Perrotta A, Furnari A, Bramanti P, Padua L, Pierelli F, Sandrini G. Four-week trunk-specific rehabilitation treatment improves lateral trunk flexion in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Feb 15;25(3):325-31. doi: 10.1002/mds.23007.
PMID: 20131386BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 14677403BACKGROUNDDaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp. 2011 May 23;(51):2744. doi: 10.3791/2744.
PMID: 21654618BACKGROUNDLefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
PMID: 25034472BACKGROUNDElsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD010916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010916.pub2.
PMID: 27425786RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cristina Tassorelli, MD
IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) was delivered by an expert technician (V.G.) that was not otherwise involved in the management of the patients. The managing physician as well as the physiotherapist were instead blind to the type of stimulation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2020
First Posted
November 9, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2019
Primary Completion
August 15, 2020
Study Completion
September 15, 2020
Last Updated
November 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share