NCT04619446

Brief Summary

To compare dentoskeletal changes in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion induced due to treatment with orthodontic appliances; removable twin block appliance and fixed AdvanSync2 appliance in two different age group patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 12, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2020

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • effect of Class II malocclusion fixed functional bite corrector in comparison to class II removable bite corrector

    efficacy of both the appliances is to be assessed

    9 to 10 months

Study Arms (2)

Removable Twin Block appliance group

Patient to be treated with removable twin block appliance that are known Class II skeletal and dental subjects.

Device: Removable Twin Block

Fixed Functional Appliance AdvanSync group

Patients to be treated with fixed functional appliance, AdvanSync (Molar-to-Molar) Class II Corrector

Device: Fixed Functional , AdvanSync Appliance

Interventions

Twin block appliance (RFA) was introduced by William Clark in 1988. Many modifications for this appliance have been introduced lately. It has been named twin block for the characteristic of two unattached maxillary and mandibular plates with acrylic bite blocks, which makes 70o angle when come in contact with each other. Delta clasps are added for better retention of the appliance. This appliance plays a vital role in the treatment of mandibular retrognathia

Removable Twin Block appliance group

AdvanSync2 (Ormco Co., Glendora, Calif) is a FFA being introduced recently as an advancement of Herbst appliance. It is a molar-to-molar appliance, connected by a telescopic rod, which allow for simultaneous treatment with braces. It is much smaller in size than the conventional Herbst appliance and reduces treatment duration up to six to nine months. It is much more acceptable by the patients as they complain less about sores and discomfort, and is esthetically pleasant since it's not visible in the mouth. Short arms of this appliance help to decrease irritation and discomfort of the patient, and helps to advance the mandible in a constant forward direction to encourage growth, and reduce malocclusion.

Fixed Functional Appliance AdvanSync group

Eligibility Criteria

Age9 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A.F.I.D, Rawalpindi. Thirty patients ( 15 between cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) stage of 2-3 to be treated with removable functional applianc and remaining 15 between CVM stage of 4-5 to be treated with fixed functional appliance) with skeletal class II malocclusion, presented at the department of Armed forces institute of dentistry (AFID).

You may qualify if:

  • Class II div 1 malocclusion with mandible being placed backwards (SNB angle \<78o)
  • Convex facial profile
  • ANB angle to be \>4 degree
  • overall good oral health
  • no previous orthodontic treatment being done
  • peak of pubertal growth at the start of treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects presenting with any developmental defects
  • Asymmetrical facial profile
  • Impacted / missing / supernumerary or transposed teeth

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (AFID)

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 44000, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Abdullah Jan, Postgraduate

    Armed Forces institute of Dentistry (AFID)

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2020

First Posted

November 6, 2020

Study Start

September 12, 2020

Primary Completion

October 1, 2021

Study Completion

November 1, 2021

Last Updated

July 29, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations