Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Effects of Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of study is to determine effects of non pain contingent spine rehabilitation in chronic low back pain.A Randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Railway general hospital. Sample size will be 32.Participants will be divided in two groups, 16 participants in group A will receive Non pain contingent spine rehabilitation (NCSR) therapy and 16 Group B will receive conventional physical therapy. The study duration will be six months. Purposive non probability sampling technique will be applied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2020
CompletedDecember 29, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.1 years
November 1, 2020
December 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale
Visual analogue scale (VAS) is a simple and frequently used method for the assessment of variations in intensity of pain. The VAS consists of a 10cm horizontal line with the words "no pain" and "worst pain" at the line's end. VAS is a reliable and valid tool to reliable and valid tool to measure pain intensity measure pain intensity. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
6th week
Functional Disability: Oswestry Disability Index
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures for the evaluation and treatment of LBP and it is valid, reliable. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
6th week
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Lumbar Range of Motion
6th week
Shirado test: to assess isometric endurance of trunk flexors
6th week
Ito test: to evaluate isometric endurance of trunk extensors
6th week
Lifting endurance
6th week
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire
6th week
Study Arms (2)
NCSR Program
EXPERIMENTALNon Pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation
Conventional Physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional Physical Therapy
Interventions
flexibility exercise,strengthening exercise,dynamic strengthening exercise,endurance training,counselling session
hot pack,flexibility training,strengthening exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with non-specific chronic low back pain(\>3months)
You may not qualify if:
- Spinal surgery
- Compression Fracture
- Disc Herniation
- Cauda equina
- Pregnancy
- Cancer
- Progressive neurological disorder
- Any Psychological disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pakistan Railway General Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
Related Publications (13)
Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022.
PMID: 27417610BACKGROUNDQaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28192789BACKGROUNDNijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A, Girbes EL, De Kooning M, Ickmans K. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E333-46.
PMID: 26000680BACKGROUNDChang WD, Lin HY, Lai PT. Core strength training for patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):619-22. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.619. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PMID: 25931693BACKGROUNDBhadauria EA, Gurudut P. Comparative effectiveness of lumbar stabilization, dynamic strengthening, and Pilates on chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Aug 29;13(4):477-485. doi: 10.12965/jer.1734972.486. eCollection 2017 Aug.
PMID: 29114516BACKGROUNDCho I, Jeon C, Lee S, Lee D, Hwangbo G. Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1983-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1983. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
PMID: 26180363BACKGROUNDAkhtar MW, Karimi H, Gilani SA. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):1002-1006. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12664.
PMID: 29067082BACKGROUNDInani SB, Selkar SP. Effect of core stabilization exercises versus conventional exercises on pain and functional status in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0348.
PMID: 23411647BACKGROUNDIto T, Shirado O, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jan;77(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90224-5.
PMID: 8554479BACKGROUNDHawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588748BACKGROUNDSaur PM, Ensink FB, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1332-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00011.
PMID: 8725925BACKGROUNDWilliamson E. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):149. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70052-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 16805041BACKGROUNDJensen LD, Maribo T, Schiottz-Christensen B, Madsen FH, Gonge B, Christensen M, Frost P. Counselling low-back-pain patients in secondary healthcare: a randomised trial addressing experienced workplace barriers and physical activity. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jan;69(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.064055. Epub 2011 May 19.
PMID: 21597108BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Khalid, MSOMPT
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2020
First Posted
November 6, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2020
Study Completion
December 20, 2020
Last Updated
December 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share