Study Stopped
The study team did not proceed with study start-up.
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Endoleak Identification and Classification
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgery for abdominal aortic pathology usually occurs in the setting of advanced cardiovascular disease. The repair can be relatively simple or complex with multiple steps including open repair, placing a stent with a catheter, and placing a complicated stent that allows for crossing vessels without occluding them. All these repairs require imaging follow up. The most commonly accepted tool for follow up is Computed Tomography (CT) scan which involves ionizing radiation and potentially nephrotoxic iodinated contrast. Recommendations for the time interval for follow up, as well the radiology imaging technique vary. Routine ultrasound with Doppler, CT, and MRI has all been employed utilizing various imaging protocols. Clinicians use non-contrast CT, arterial phase and delayed phase CT, ultrasound, and various combinations based on personal experience and patient pathology. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure has led to investigation of alternate imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CEUS represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CT report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA. Contrast ultrasound has been used effectively to diagnose leaks in the aorta post repair and is without the radiation and potential nephrotoxicity of iodinated contrast. Of yet, no large prospective studies have compared CT and contrast US and no studies have looked at the more complicated staged or fenestrated repairs. This study proposes to perform a contrast ultrasound at the same time as a contrast CT using a standardized protocol. This protocol would include a non-contrast CT, angiographic CT, and a CT in a delayed phase in all patients as standard of care. We will compare the results of a contrast US with the various data derived from a three phase CT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 14, 2022
November 1, 2022
2 years
October 28, 2020
November 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To determine the sensitivity and specificity for CEUS and various CTA phases when using delay phase of CTA as the gold standard
Binomial 95% confidence interval will be calculated for sensitivity and specificity. One- sided binomial test will be conducted to test whether the target sensitivity and specificity are superior to the null value, e.g. a minimal acceptable level of sensitivity and specificity.
24 months
Is there any endoleak positive on CEUS or various phases of the CTA but negative on CTA in the delayed phase
In detecting the rate of endoleak positive on CEUS or other phases of the CTA but negative on CTA in the delayed phase, we will compute Clopper Pearson Exact 95% confidence interval since such a rate could be small. To assess consistency of endoleak type (type 1-5) between CEUS and delayed phase CTA, Kappa coefficient will be used.
24 months
Study Arms (1)
contrast enhanced ultrasound
EXPERIMENTALCEUS will be performed at one month post-op, six months post-op and at one year.
Interventions
CEUS involves the use of microbubble contrast agents and specialized imaging techniques to enhance the signal from blood, thus showing flow in macroscopic vessels as well as tissue perfusion information
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Aged 18 or over 2. Able to give informed consent 3. Undergone an EVAR or FEVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms 4. Expected to have CTA
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to receive CTA (Contrast Allergy, Insufficient renal function for standard outpatient contrast study (eGFR \<30) Overactive thyroid gland)
- Unable to receive CEUS contrast, previous reaction to Ultrasound Contrast Agent (UCA)
- BMI \>50
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
USC Department of Radiology
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward Grant
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Clinical Radiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2020
First Posted
November 4, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share