NCT04615559

Brief Summary

Surgery for abdominal aortic pathology usually occurs in the setting of advanced cardiovascular disease. The repair can be relatively simple or complex with multiple steps including open repair, placing a stent with a catheter, and placing a complicated stent that allows for crossing vessels without occluding them. All these repairs require imaging follow up. The most commonly accepted tool for follow up is Computed Tomography (CT) scan which involves ionizing radiation and potentially nephrotoxic iodinated contrast. Recommendations for the time interval for follow up, as well the radiology imaging technique vary. Routine ultrasound with Doppler, CT, and MRI has all been employed utilizing various imaging protocols. Clinicians use non-contrast CT, arterial phase and delayed phase CT, ultrasound, and various combinations based on personal experience and patient pathology. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure has led to investigation of alternate imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CEUS represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CT report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA. Contrast ultrasound has been used effectively to diagnose leaks in the aorta post repair and is without the radiation and potential nephrotoxicity of iodinated contrast. Of yet, no large prospective studies have compared CT and contrast US and no studies have looked at the more complicated staged or fenestrated repairs. This study proposes to perform a contrast ultrasound at the same time as a contrast CT using a standardized protocol. This protocol would include a non-contrast CT, angiographic CT, and a CT in a delayed phase in all patients as standard of care. We will compare the results of a contrast US with the various data derived from a three phase CT.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 14, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 8, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity for CEUS and various CTA phases when using delay phase of CTA as the gold standard

    Binomial 95% confidence interval will be calculated for sensitivity and specificity. One- sided binomial test will be conducted to test whether the target sensitivity and specificity are superior to the null value, e.g. a minimal acceptable level of sensitivity and specificity.

    24 months

  • Is there any endoleak positive on CEUS or various phases of the CTA but negative on CTA in the delayed phase

    In detecting the rate of endoleak positive on CEUS or other phases of the CTA but negative on CTA in the delayed phase, we will compute Clopper Pearson Exact 95% confidence interval since such a rate could be small. To assess consistency of endoleak type (type 1-5) between CEUS and delayed phase CTA, Kappa coefficient will be used.

    24 months

Study Arms (1)

contrast enhanced ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL

CEUS will be performed at one month post-op, six months post-op and at one year.

Diagnostic Test: Contrast enhanced ultrasound

Interventions

CEUS involves the use of microbubble contrast agents and specialized imaging techniques to enhance the signal from blood, thus showing flow in macroscopic vessels as well as tissue perfusion information

contrast enhanced ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Aged 18 or over 2. Able to give informed consent 3. Undergone an EVAR or FEVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms 4. Expected to have CTA

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to receive CTA (Contrast Allergy, Insufficient renal function for standard outpatient contrast study (eGFR \<30) Overactive thyroid gland)
  • Unable to receive CEUS contrast, previous reaction to Ultrasound Contrast Agent (UCA)
  • BMI \>50

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

USC Department of Radiology

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic AneurysmAneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Edward Grant

    University of Southern California

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Clinical Radiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2020

First Posted

November 4, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

July 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations