NCT04615286

Brief Summary

Infection of the pleural space is serious condition that requires hospitalization, invasive interventions and long courses of antibiotics\[1\]. Treatment of pleural infection requires long hospital admission with a median of 19 days\[2\] and medical treatments fails requiring surgical intervention in up to 30% of cases\[3\]. The mortality from pleural infection is around 10% at 3 months\[4\]. Besides drainage of the infected fluid, antibiotics are a core component of management of pleural infection\[5\] and are typically given intravenously in the first few days of treatment until the condition is stabilized at which stage patients are shifted to oral antibiotics of equivalent spectrum. In almost half of the cases of pleural infection, the choice of antibiotics is entirely empirical due to low yield of microbiological tests on pleural fluid in these cases\[6\]. International guidelines cite a minimum length of antibiotic course of pleural infection of four weeks\[5,7\] with antibiotic courses typically lasting six weeks\[8\]. However, these recommendations are based on expert opinion with no robust evidence to support such durations. The RAPID (renal function, age, purulence, infection source and dietary factors) score has recently been validated as a robust tool to predict 3-month mortality of patients with pleural infection based on demographic and laboratory data (table 1)\[4\]. A low score (0-2) is associated with 2-3% mortality, medium score (3-4) 9% mortality and high score (5-7) 30% mortality at three months\[9\]. The utility for this score in clinical management is yet to be determined and this study will attempt using this score to stratify lengths of antibiotic treatment based on proposed risk of adverse outcomes as stipulated by the RAPID score. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of prescribing shorter courses of antibiotics (2-3 weeks) versus the standard longer courses (4-6 weeks) in medically-treated patients with pleural infection at lower risk of mortality (RAPID score 0-4) who can be safely discharged home within 14 days of hospitalization and how this impacts success of medical treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2020

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 6, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 21, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants with failure of medical treatment

    Incidence of failure of treatment as judged by trial clinician requiring further antibiotics and/or tube drainage and/or surgical intervention by six weeks post initial admission. Failure will be determined based on the one or more of the following parameter: clinical (recurrence of symptoms), biochemical (worsening of WCC \[by 2000/mm3\] or CRP \[by \> 20%\] from discharge values) and radiological (chest X-ray +/- TUS evidence of increasing or new pleural collection).

    Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Length of antibiotic treatment in days

    Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis

  • Number of participants with chest X ray worsening at 6 weeks

    Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis

  • Time to return to normal daily activities in days

    Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis

  • Number of participants requiring readmission within 30 days from discharge

    30 days from discharge

Study Arms (2)

Short course

EXPERIMENTAL

Antibiotic course of 2-3 weeks overall duration for treating pleural infection

Other: Short course (2-3 weeks) of antibiotics

Long course

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Antibiotic course of 4-6 weeks overall duration for treating pleural infection

Other: Standard (long course) of antibiotics

Interventions

Shorter course of antibiotic than standard care of 4-6 weeks

Short course

4-6 weeks of antibiotics

Long course

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (\>18 years old)
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Admitted to hospital for treatment of pleural infection (both parapneumonic and primary pleural infections included). Pleural infection will be defined by the presence of one of the following:
  • the presence of pus in the pleural space;
  • positive pleural fluid gram stain or culture; or
  • pleural fluid pH \< 7.2 or pleural fluid glucose \< 40 mg/dL in the setting of acute respiratory infection.
  • RAPID low or intermediate score (0-4)
  • Fit for discharge within 14th day of admission

You may not qualify if:

  • Failure of medical treatment within 14 days of admission and need for surgical referral
  • Need for hospital admission beyond 14 days due to medical reasons
  • Admission to recurrent ipsilateral pleural infection within the last three months
  • RAPID high score (5 or more)
  • Pleural infection not amenable to drainage at time of diagnosis and therefore upfront decision to treat with prolonged antibiotics
  • Residual pleural collection (despite attempted drainage) that the managing clinician indicated is for prolonged oral suppressive therapy (i.e. six weeks of oral antibiotics).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine

Alexandria, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Davies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii41-53. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137000. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20696693BACKGROUND
  • Cargill TN, Hassan M, Corcoran JP, Harriss E, Asciak R, Mercer RM, McCracken DJ, Bedawi EO, Rahman NM. A systematic review of comorbidities and outcomes of adult patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 1;54(3):1900541. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00541-2019. Print 2019 Sep.

    PMID: 31391221BACKGROUND
  • Maskell NA, Lee YC, Gleeson FV, Hedley EL, Pengelly G, Davies RJ. Randomized trials describing lung inflammation after pleurodesis with talc of varying particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug 15;170(4):377-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1579OC. Epub 2004 May 13.

    PMID: 15142871BACKGROUND
  • Corcoran JP, Psallidas I, Gerry S, Piccolo F, Koegelenberg CF, Saba T, Daneshvar C, Fairbairn I, Heinink R, West A, Stanton AE, Holme J, Kastelik JA, Steer H, Downer NJ, Haris M, Baker EH, Everett CF, Pepperell J, Bewick T, Yarmus L, Maldonado F, Khan B, Hart-Thomas A, Hands G, Warwick G, De Fonseka D, Hassan M, Munavvar M, Guhan A, Shahidi M, Pogson Z, Dowson L, Popowicz ND, Saba J, Ward NR, Hallifax RJ, Dobson M, Shaw R, Hedley EL, Sabia A, Robinson B, Collins GS, Davies HE, Yu LM, Miller RF, Maskell NA, Rahman NM. Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study. Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 26;56(5):2000130. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020. Print 2020 Nov.

    PMID: 32675200BACKGROUND
  • Bedawi EO, Hassan M, Rahman NM. Recent developments in the management of pleural infection: A comprehensive review. Clin Respir J. 2018 Aug;12(8):2309-2320. doi: 10.1111/crj.12941.

    PMID: 30005142BACKGROUND
  • Hassan M, Cargill T, Harriss E, Asciak R, Mercer RM, Bedawi EO, McCracken DJ, Psallidas I, Corcoran JP, Rahman NM. The microbiology of pleural infection in adults: a systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 1;54(3):1900542. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00542-2019. Print 2019 Sep.

    PMID: 31248959BACKGROUND
  • Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. BMJ. 2015 Sep 8;351:h4520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4520. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26350935BACKGROUND
  • Hooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis A, Clive AO, Morley A, White P, Medford AR, Harvey JE, Darby M, Zahan-Evans N, Maskell NA. Pleural irrigation trial (PIT): a randomised controlled trial of pleural irrigation with normal saline versus standard care in patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):456-63. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00147214. Epub 2015 May 28.

    PMID: 26022948BACKGROUND
  • Rahman NM, Kahan BC, Miller RF, Gleeson FV, Nunn AJ, Maskell NA. A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection. Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):848-855. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1558.

    PMID: 24264558BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anti-Infective AgentsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and Uses

Study Officials

  • Maged Hassan, PhD

    Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2020

First Posted

November 4, 2020

Study Start

September 28, 2020

Primary Completion

November 10, 2021

Study Completion

December 6, 2021

Last Updated

December 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The spreadsheets with de-identified patient information will be stored securely after trial conclusion with the principal investigator and will be accessible to other members of the study team. Request to access study data by persons outside the study teams will be expected via email and access will be granted by the principal investigator if the request is deemed reasonable.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
5 years after study completion
Access Criteria
The data that support the findings of this study will be available on request from the corresponding author upon publishing the manuscript with the main results.

Locations