Lidocaine Intravenous in the Emergency Department For Sickle Cell Crisis
RELIEF-SCC
Randomized Trial Evaluating Lidocaine Intravenous in the Emergency Department For Sickle Cell Crisis - RELIEF-SCC
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Sickle cell crisis continues to be a frequent presentation to emergency departments. Patients presenting will often require immediate treatment for their pain and often times this will include opioids. The opioid epidemic has cost thousands of lives; and continues to be a significant problem posing several challenges when treating patients presenting with sickle cell disease. Primarily, opioids remain the mainstay of treatment for these patients and the push to address the opioid crisis may present challenges for adequate opioid administration in patients suffering from a sickle cell crisis while hospitals find ways to curb the opioid crisis overall. Opioid treatment for patients in acute vaso-occlusive crisis has significantly contributed to quality of life and life expectancy of patients with this diagnosis. Measures should continue to attempt to administer a multi-model approach to sickle cell patients to minimize the morphine milligram equivalents in these patients while also successfully addressing the patient's pain. IV lidocaine is a pain medication that has been evaluated in several painful experiences, such as in renal colic. A few case reports have shown IV lidocaine use in sickle cell can be a potential effective adjunct medication to opioids to treat pain and reduce further opioid requirements. Currently, no prospective controlled trial exists to evaluate the true benefit of IV lidocaine in this population. Our study aims to evaluate IV lidocaine as an adjunct to opioid treatment in the emergency department to determine if improved pain is achieved and if there is a reduction in overall morphine milligram equivalents throughout the emergency department visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 29, 2023
August 1, 2023
1 year
October 22, 2020
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain at 30 minutes
Change of visual analog pain scale (VAS, 0-10) at 30 minutes post-infusion of lidocaine or placebo.
from pre-lidocaine infusion to 30 minutes post-infusion
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Total opiate dosage received
from presentation to the Emergency department (ED) until patient disposition (up to 12 hours)
% Patients requiring additional opiate administration
from presentation to the Emergency department (ED) until patient disposition (up to 12 hours)
Time to next opiate administered
from administration of lidocaine infusion until patient disposition (up to 12 hours) or next opiate administered
Total MME post-lidocaine up to 12 hours
12 hours post-lidocaine or placebo infusion.
Percentage of patients discharged from ED
from presentation to the Emergency department (ED) until patient disposition (up to 12 hours)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORLidocaine 1.5mg/kg (Max: 200mg) in dextrose 5% 100mL over 10 minutes along with either morphine 0.1-0.15mg/kg IV OR hydromorphone 0.01-0.02mg/kg IV.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORDextrose 5% 100mL (placebo) over 10 minutes along with either morphine 0.1-0.15mg/kg IV OR hydromorphone 0.01-0.02mg/kg IV.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 18 years old with sickle cell disease experiencing persistent severe (7-10/10) pain despite receiving at least one dose of intravenous opiate analgesic.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years old and pregnant
- Patients presenting with or suspected to have acute chest syndrome
- Allergy or intolerance to lidocaine products or morphine/hydromorphone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJlead
- Newark Beth Israel Medical Centercollaborator
- Monmouth Medical Centercollaborator
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Schoolcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Monmouth Medical Center
Long Branch, New Jersey, 07740, United States
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112, United States
Related Publications (13)
E Silva LOJ, Scherber K, Cabrera D, Motov S, Erwin PJ, West CP, Murad MH, Bellolio MF. Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain Management in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;72(2):135-144.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29395284BACKGROUNDLanzkron S, Carroll CP, Haywood C Jr. The burden of emergency department use for sickle-cell disease: an analysis of the national emergency department sample database. Am J Hematol. 2010 Oct;85(10):797-9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21807.
PMID: 20730795BACKGROUNDPayne J, Aban I, Hilliard LM, Madison J, Bemrich-Stolz C, Howard TH, Brandow A, Waite E, Lebensburger JD. Impact of early analgesia on hospitalization outcomes for sickle cell pain crisis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Dec;65(12):e27420. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27420. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
PMID: 30151977BACKGROUNDLexicomp Online, Lexi-Drugs Online, Hudson, Ohio: Lexi-Comp, Inc.; December 15, 2017.
BACKGROUNDEipe N, Gupta S, Penning J. Intravenous Lidocaine for Acute Pain: an Evidence-based Clinical Update. BJA Education,16(9):292-298(2016). Doi: 10.1093/bjaed/mkw008
BACKGROUNDCarroll CP, Lanzkron S, Haywood C Jr, Kiley K, Pejsa M, Moscou-Jackson G, Haythornthwaite JA, Campbell CM. Chronic Opioid Therapy and Central Sensitization in Sickle Cell Disease. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1 Suppl 1):S69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.012.
PMID: 27320469BACKGROUNDNguyen NL, Kome AM, Lowe DK, Coyne P, Hawks KG. Intravenous Lidocaine as an Adjuvant for Pain Associated with Sickle Cell Disease. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015;29(4):359-64. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1082009.
PMID: 26654408BACKGROUNDRousseau V, Morelle M, Arriuberge C, Darnis S, Chabaud S, Launay V, Thouvenin S, Roumenoff-Turcant F, Metzger S, Tourniaire B, Marec-Berard P. Efficacy and Tolerance of Lidocaine 5% Patches in Neuropathic Pain and Pain Related to Vaso-occlusive Sickle Cell Crises in Children: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):788-797. doi: 10.1111/papr.12674. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PMID: 29266772BACKGROUNDSoleimanpour H, Hassanzadeh K, Vaezi H, Golzari SE, Esfanjani RM, Soleimanpour M. Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department. BMC Urol. 2012 May 4;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13.
PMID: 22559856BACKGROUNDFirouzian A, Alipour A, Rashidian Dezfouli H, Zamani Kiasari A, Gholipour Baradari A, Emami Zeydi A, Amini Ahidashti H, Montazami M, Hosseininejad SM, Yazdani Kochuei F. Does lidocaine as an adjuvant to morphine improve pain relief in patients presenting to the ED with acute renal colic? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PMID: 26704774BACKGROUNDBijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):390-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x.
PMID: 12670856BACKGROUNDHoldgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J. Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Oct-Dec;15(5-6):441-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00499.x.
PMID: 14992058BACKGROUNDMotov S, Fassassi C, Drapkin J, Butt M, Hossain R, Likourezos A, Monfort R, Brady J, Rothberger N, Mann SS, Flom P, Gulati V, Marshall J. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to either analgesic alone for suspected renal colic pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PMID: 30770244BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shreni Zinzuwadia, MD
Newark Beth Israel
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Lidocaine or placebo will be dispensed from the pharmacy in identical bags labeled "Lidocaine (x)mg or Placebo". The pharmacy will maintain randomization and blinding until the end of the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Research Coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2020
First Posted
November 4, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 2, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08