NCT04613713

Brief Summary

This is a two-arm randomized clinical trial assessing effectiveness of somatocognitive therapy versus treatment as usual for provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). PVD is a common, but under-treated persistent pain condition, mostly affecting young women in their late teens and early 20s. It is the most frequent cause of pain during sexual intercourse affecting around 10% of women in the general population. There are no generally accepted evidence-based guidelines for the medical management of PVD. The most commonly used treatments are topical (85%), physiotherapy (52%), and oral medications (45%). High quality randomized clinical trials testing effectiveness of various therapy approaches are urgently needed. Somatocognitive therapy SCT is a multi-modal physiotherapy approach developed for alleviating musculoskeletal persistent pain conditions. SCT has been previously evaluated in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain. In the current study, 128 women with PVD will be randomized into SCT and treatment as usual (TAU) group. Participants will be assessed at baseline, after 6 months and after 12 months. The main outcome will be changes in female sexual function index scored at 12 months follow up. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity as assessed by a tampon test as well as a number of questionnaires recording different aspects of emotional and cognitive functioning. In addition cost-effectiveness analysis of SCT versus TAU will be performed. Participants in the SCT group will receive up to 15 therapy sessions and will additionally be offered one booster session at 6 months after treatment ending. TAU group will follow treatment options of their own choice based on recommendations from the Vulva clinic at Oslo University Hospital, a center that is specialized in treating women with vulvar pain conditions.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 26, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 21, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

October 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Provoked vestibulodyniaDyspareuniaSomatocognitive therapyPhysiotherapyRandomised clinical trialWomen's healthSexual dysfunctionPain management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in female sexual function index (FSFI) (Rosen et al. 2000)

    A multidimensional scale assessing key dimensions of female sexual function. The FSFI is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure sexual functioning in women. It assesses six domains of sexual function: sexual desire, sexual arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain (i.e., pain associated with vaginal penetration). Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning.

    Baseline, 6 and 12 months follow up

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change in Participant Perceived Improvement (PGIC) (Dworkin et al. 2005)

    6 and 12 months follow up

  • Change in the tampon test (Foster et al. 2009)

    Baseline, 6 and 12 months follow up

  • Change in recalled pain intensity during intercourse

    Baseline, 6 and 12 months follow up

  • Change in Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire (VPAQ) (Dargie et al. 2017) - life interference

    Baseline, 6 and 12 months follow up

  • Change in Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire (VPAQ) (Dargie et al. 2017) - coping strategies

    Baseline, 6 and 12 months follow up

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Somatocognitive physiotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Somatocognitive therapy is a multi-modal physiotherapy intervention utilized for women with longstanding chronic pelvic pain and provoked vestibulodynia developed at the beginning of the 2000s as a collaboration between the department of psychosomatic medicine, Oslo University Hospital (OUH) and department of physiotherapy (OsloMet)

Other: Somatocognitive physiotherapy

Treatment as usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The participants randomized to the treatment as usual group will follow available treatment options based on the current recommendations from Vulva clinic at Oslo University Hospital, a center that is specialized in treatment of vulvar conditions.

Other: Treatment as usual

Interventions

The main intervention areas include: 1. education about the PVD, healthy vulvo-vaginal and sexual behaviors, nature of chronic pain and factors influencing pain intensity 2. bodily exercises and techniques increasing body awareness, ability to relax and control muscle tension and respiration pattern in different situations 3. techniques to cope with emotions and thoughts related to bodily experiences and to PVD 4. structured homework assignments promoting application of the learned techniques in daily situations and gradual exposure of the patient to activities associated with pain. Participants will be offered maximally 15 treatment sessions. No minimal number of sessions is set. Treatment will be conducted by female physiotherapists experienced in treating long-standing pain conditions.

Somatocognitive physiotherapy

The participants will follow the current treatment advice as recommended by the Vulva Clinic at OUH, a tertiary health care center specialized in treatment of vulvar disorders. Advice include guidance about the management of PVD as a condition, use of medication, physiotherapy, sexologist and psychological counseling, usage of internet resources (vulva.no) and others. Participants will be free to pursue treatment options of their choice. The type of treatment, number of treatments and medication usage will be monitored by bi-weekly electronic forms during the whole study period.

Treatment as usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of provoked vestibulodynia
  • Age: 18 to 35
  • Must understand Norwegian well enough to be able to complete questionnaires
  • Must be able to attend treatment in Oslo, Norway

You may not qualify if:

  • Active infection in the vulvar region
  • Dermatologic lesion in the vulvar region
  • Presence of diagnostically confirmed psychiatric condition that necessitate treatment by a medical specialist in psychiatry of clinical psychology

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo Metropolitan University

Oslo, 0130, Norway

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.

    PMID: 10782451BACKGROUND
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15621359BACKGROUND
  • Foster DC, Beth Kotok M, Huang LS, Watts A, Oakes D, Howard FM, Stodgell CJ, Dworkin RH. The tampon test for vulvodynia treatment outcomes research: reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):825-832. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819bda7c.

    PMID: 19305326BACKGROUND
  • Dargie E, Holden RR, Pukall CF. The Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Preliminary Norms, Internal Consistency, and Test-Retest Reliability. J Sex Med. 2017 Dec;14(12):1585-1596. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.10.072.

    PMID: 29198513BACKGROUND
  • Fernandes L, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 22;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-111.

    PMID: 22726668BACKGROUND
  • Parola N, Zendjidjian XY, Alessandrini M, Baumstarck K, Loundou A, Fond G, Berna F, Lancon C, Auquier P, Boyer L. Psychometric properties of the Ruminative Response Scale-short form in a clinical sample of patients with major depressive disorder. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 May 12;11:929-937. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S125730. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28553085BACKGROUND
  • Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 1974 Jan;19(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830190102. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4808738BACKGROUND
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND
  • Rosen NO, Bergeron S, Pukall CF. Recommendations for the Study of Vulvar Pain in Women, Part 1: Review of Assessment Tools. J Sex Med. 2020 Feb;17(2):180-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

    PMID: 31812684BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

VulvodyniaDyspareuniaSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalAgnosia

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vulvar DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleMale Urogenital DiseasesSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalMental DisordersPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Slawomir Wojniusz, Phd

    Oslo Metropolitan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Slawomir Wojniusz, Phd

CONTACT

Mette B Kaarbø, Msc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Statistician analyzing the data will be blinded for group belonging
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel group randomized clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2020

First Posted

November 3, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations