NCT04613635

Brief Summary

To compare shorttime (6 months) results of two competitive suture materials with regard to time demanded to perform the concerned surgical step and secondary to study anastomotic site safety and complications like leakage and hemorrhage as well as development of anastomotic strictures. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2020

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 6, 2020

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 27, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Mini-Gastric BypassOne Anastomosis Gastric BypassGastroenteral AnastomosisMGBOAGB

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Closure of gastrojejunostomy

    time needed to perform this specific surgical step, i.e. the ventral defect closure of the (otherwise stapled) gastrojejunostomy

    The assessment of this surgical step will be completed during the operation.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • anastomotic site perioperative morbidity

    6 months

  • other anastomosis- related morbidity

    6 months

  • economical factors

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Stratafix

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Stratafix

Vicryl

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Vicryl

Interventions

StratafixDEVICE

Closure of ventral defect of the otherwise stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis with Stratafix USP (United States Pharmacopoe) 2-0 thread

Also known as: monocrylic spiral knotless tissue control device
Stratafix
VicrylDEVICE

Closure of ventral defect of the otherwise stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis with Vicryl USP 2-0 thread

Also known as: traditional polyglactin multifilament suture
Vicryl

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • adult patients selected for primary Mini-Gastric bypass to treat obesity (BMI\>30)
  • laparoscopic access feasable (intention to treat laparoscopically)
  • failed conservative treatment (accepted by health insurance companies)
  • relevant co-morbidities in cases with BMI \<40
  • age 18 years or elder

You may not qualify if:

  • severe language problems
  • revisional or redo-procedures
  • operation intended as open procedure(extensive previous surgeries),
  • operation performed under corticoid-medication
  • operation performed under full-dose anticoagulants
  • operation performed by another surgeon than one of the 3 experienced MGB-surgeons of the Department

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Franziskus-Hospital

Cologne, 50825, Germany

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Tsou JJ, Chen SC, Chen JC. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012 Dec;22(12):1827-34. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9.

    PMID: 23011462BACKGROUND
  • Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005 Oct;15(9):1304-8. doi: 10.1381/096089205774512663.

    PMID: 16259892BACKGROUND
  • Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1430-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1220-3.

    PMID: 24682767BACKGROUND
  • Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, Rau C, Bruzzi M, Beaupel N, Zinzindohoue F, Berger A. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015 Jun;25(6):951-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1552-z.

    PMID: 25585612BACKGROUND
  • Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, Daher R, Antoun NA, Nasr M. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012 May;22(5):697-703. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z.

    PMID: 22411569BACKGROUND
  • Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, De Luca M, Manno E, Di Stefano C, Milone M, Bonfanti R, Segato G, Antonino A, Piazza L. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):156-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3141-y. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

    PMID: 23982648BACKGROUND
  • Taha O, Abdelaal M, Abozeid M, Askalany A, Alaa M. Outcomes of Omega Loop Gastric Bypass, 6-Years Experience of 1520 Cases. Obes Surg. 2017 Aug;27(8):1952-1960. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2623-8.

    PMID: 28303503BACKGROUND
  • Carbajo MA, Luque-de-Leon E, Jimenez JM, Ortiz-de-Solorzano J, Perez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Technique, Results, and Long-Term Follow-Up in 1200 Patients. Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1153-1167. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2428-1.

    PMID: 27783366BACKGROUND
  • Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, Huang MT, Ser KH, Chen JC. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008 Mar;18(3):294-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9367-9. Epub 2008 Jan 12.

    PMID: 18193178BACKGROUND
  • Skroubis G, Sakellaropoulos G, Pouggouras K, Mead N, Nikiforidis G, Kalfarentzos F. Comparison of nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and after biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002 Aug;12(4):551-8. doi: 10.1381/096089202762252334.

    PMID: 12194550BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity, MorbidAnastomotic LeakPostoperative Hemorrhage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ObesityOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesHemorrhage

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2020

First Posted

November 3, 2020

Study Start

November 6, 2020

Primary Completion

October 27, 2023

Study Completion

April 30, 2024

Last Updated

December 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Locations