Comparison of Laparoscopic Traditional and Knotless Sutures
Closing the Anastomoses During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Comparison of Traditional and Knotless Sutures
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background Excess weight and obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global death. Bariatric surgery is considered as the only effective long-term treatment for morbid obesity. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the best surgical procedures, since it achieves excellent long-term results with a low complication rate. Intestinal anastomosis is a very complex and time-consuming procedure in laparoscopy, mainly due to the difficulties of knotting the suture in a limited working area. Barbed sutures may enhance this procedure by eliminating the need for knot tying. Objective The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of knotless barbed sutures (Stratafix) and continuous sutures (Vicryl) for closing the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomosis in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. Study design This is a prospective randomized study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: traditional suture group or knotless suture group. Randomization will be realized by sealed envelopes according to a computer-generated sequence of random numbers, which will be opened for the surgeon just before starting the anastomosis. During the surgery the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses will be performed with a stapler (Echelon 45 Endopath) and closed with a traditional (Vicryl) or knotless (Stratafix Unidirectional) suture. The same surgeon, experienced and specialized in laparoscopic gastric bypass technique, will perform all procedures. Study population Two hundred patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Main study parameters/endpoints The primary outcome measure will be the rate of anastomosis-related complications (leakage, bleeding, gastric fistula, anastomotic stenosis) at 4 weeks and at 6 months post-op (safety). The secondary outcome measure will be the time spent on closing the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomosis (efficacy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2016
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
February 1, 2017
9 months
March 11, 2016
February 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complication rate.
Complications encountered postoperatively: leakage, stenosis, bleeding and gastric fistula.
Up until 6 months after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Length of hospital stay.
Through study completion, an average of 3 days.
Total procedure time.
intraoperative
Jejunojejunal anastomosis time.
intraoperative
Gastrojejunal anastomosis time.
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Stratafix
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB (antecolic, antegastric, "linear anastomosis-technique") using unidirectional barbed (knotless) sutures: Stratafix Unidirectional 2/0.
Vicryl
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB (antecolic, antegastric, "linear anastomosis-technique") using classic sutures: Vicryl 2/0.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years
- BMI \> 40 (morbid obesity) or BMI \> 35 with co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes, proven sleep apnoea and/or refractory arterial hypertension)
- Reasonable attempts at other weight loss techniques
- Obesity related health problems
- No psychiatric or drug dependency problems
- Capable to understand the risks and commitment associated with the surgery
- Pregnancy not anticipated in the first two years following surgery
You may not qualify if:
- No agreement to informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Costantino F, Dente M, Perrin P, Sarhan FA, Keller P. Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3846-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2993-5. Epub 2013 May 31.
PMID: 23722892BACKGROUNDDe Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS. Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg. 2013 Jan;23(1):60-3. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0763-4.
PMID: 22968833BACKGROUNDFacy O, De Blasi V, Goergen M, Arru L, De Magistris L, Azagra JS. Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3841-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2992-6. Epub 2013 May 14.
PMID: 23670743BACKGROUNDFisher BL, Schauer P. Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg. 2002 Dec;184(6B):9S-16S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01173-x.
PMID: 12527344BACKGROUNDFlegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723.
PMID: 12365955BACKGROUNDGonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR, Bowers SP, Smith CD. Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg. 2003 Feb;138(2):181-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.2.181.
PMID: 12578417BACKGROUNDMilone M, Di Minno MN, Galloro G, Maietta P, Bianco P, Milone F, Musella M. Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Sep;23(9):756-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0030. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
PMID: 23859743BACKGROUNDSchauer PR, Burguera B, Ikramuddin S, Cottam D, Gourash W, Hamad G, Eid GM, Mattar S, Ramanathan R, Barinas-Mitchel E, Rao RH, Kuller L, Kelley D. Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):467-84; discussion 84-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089851.41115.1b.
PMID: 14530719BACKGROUNDSuter M, Donadini A, Romy S, Demartines N, Giusti V. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):267-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263b66.
PMID: 21772127BACKGROUNDGys B, Gys T, Lafullarde T. The Use of Unidirectional Knotless Barbed Suture for Enterotomy Closure in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Comparative Study. Obes Surg. 2017 Aug;27(8):2159-2163. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2628-3.
PMID: 28281235DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ben Gys, md
AZ Sint Dimpna, Geel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- md
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2016
First Posted
March 28, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02