NCT04605822

Brief Summary

This study is to compare 2D- and 3D-imaging and routine clinical care in early melanoma detection in a prospective large-scale real-world data set.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
455

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

3D total body photography (TBP)2D sequential digital dermatoscopic imaging (SDDI)skin malignancyartificial intelligence (AI)- based tools3D TBP Vectra® WB360 systemFotoFinder ATBM® MasterSkinVision®

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Analyses of histopathology reports of all excised suspectable lesions

    The primary outcome, the sensitivity of human and artificial intelligence in detecting melanoma, will be measured at every study visit in case of a suspected melanoma by analysing histopathology reports of all excised suspectable lesions. The diagnosis of melanoma will be confirmed by histology. The biopsied pigmented skin lesions will be categorized as benign (melanocytic nevi / dysplastic nevi) or malignant (melanoma).

    up to 24 months

  • Analyses of dermatologists' assessment of each pigmented skin lesion as benign (melanocytic nevi / dysplastic nevi) or malignant (melanoma) before and after (without and with knowledge of) computer-guided risk assessment scores

    Analyses of dermatologists' assessment of each pigmented skin lesion as benign (melanocytic nevi / dysplastic nevi) or malignant (melanoma) before and after computer-guided risk assessment scores by Vectra® WB360 and FotoFinder® Mole Analyzer and smartphone app.

    up to 24 months

  • Analyses of 2D FotoFinder® Mole Analyzer scoring of pigmented skin lesions (0.0 - 1.0)

    The primary outcome, the sensitivity of human and artificial intelligence in detecting melanoma, will be measured at every study visit in case of a suspected melanoma by 2D FotoFinder® Mole Analyzer scoring of pigmented skin lesions (0.0 - 1.0). Scores 0.0 - 1.0; 0 indicating no suspicion for melanoma, 1 indicating a high suspicion for melanoma).

    up to 24 months

  • Analyses of 3D Vectra® WB360 imaging scoring of pigmented skin lesions (0- 10)

    The primary outcome, the sensitivity of human and artificial intelligence in detecting melanoma, will be measured at every study visit in case of a suspected melanoma by analysing 3D Vectra® WB360 imaging scoring of pigmented skin lesions (0- 10). Score 0 - 10; 0 indicating no suspicion for melanoma, 10 indicating a high suspicion for melanoma).

    up to 24 months

  • Analyses of Smartphone app Skin Vision® scoring of pigmented skin lesions (low, medium or high risk)

    The primary outcome, the sensitivity of human and artificial intelligence in detecting melanoma, will be measured at every study visit in case of a suspected melanoma by analysing Smartphone app Skin Vision® scoring of pigmented skin lesions (low, medium or high risk).

    up to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Distress thermometer (Patient-reported outcome)

    up to 24 months

  • Change in FACIT G7 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General - (7 item version).

    up to 24 months

  • Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    up to 24 months

  • Change in Melanoma Worry Scale (MWS)

    up to 24 months

  • Change in support need and uptake

    up to 24 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Comparison of automated naevus counts from 3D total-body photography

    Up to 3 years

  • Impact of sun damage on diagnostic accuracy of DEXI algorithm in melanoma recognition

    Up to 3 years

  • Patient perception of AI utilisation in skin cancer screening via questionaire

    Up to 3 years

  • +1 more other outcomes

Interventions

3D Total Body Photography Vectra® WB360 (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA) and its digital dermoscopic camera (VISIOMED® D200evo dermatoscope) and scoring of pigmented skin lesions. All participants of this study will undergo 3D TBP at baseline and the follow-up visits up to month 24.

2D imaging with FotoFinder® Mole Analyzer and scoring of pigmented skin lesions. All participants of this study will undergo 2D imaging FotoFinder ATBM® Master imaging system at baseline and the follow-up visits up to month 24.

Smartphone application for all dermatoscopically documented pigmented skin lesions in all study participations and record of risk assessment of the health application (low, medium or high risk) to compare the app's accuracy in risk assessment with the AI tools and the dermatologist. The SkinVision® smartphone app is CE certified.of skin lesions. All participants of this study will undergo Smartphone application (SkinVision®) at baseline and the follow-up visits up to month 12.

Clinical skin examination with dermatoscope by an experienced dermatologist and risk assessment of pigmented lesions (melanoma vs. naevus). All participants of this study will undergo Standard-of-care clinical assessment of the skin at baseline and the follow-up visits up to month 24.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients will be recruited during melanoma consultations and the consultation in the outpatient clinic at the Department of Dermatology at the University Hospital Basel from Q4/2020 until Q4/2021.

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent of the patient
  • Sufficient fluency in German language skills to complete all questionnaires of the study without external assistance
  • High-risk criteria for melanoma. For "high risk" one of the following criteria needs to be fulfilled:
  • At least one previous melanoma (including melanoma in situ)
  • A diagnosis of ≥ 100 nevi
  • A diagnosis of ≥ 5 atypical nevi
  • A diagnosis of dysplastic nevus syndrome or known CDKN2A mutation
  • A strong family history (≥ 1 first- and/or second-degree relatives)

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of informed consent for study participation.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type V-VI.
  • Acute psychiatric illness or acute crisis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel

Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Goessinger EV, Niederfeilner JC, Cerminara S, Maul JT, Kostner L, Kunz M, Huber S, Koral E, Habermacher L, Sabato G, Tadic A, Zimmermann C, Navarini A, Maul LV. Patient and dermatologists' perspectives on augmented intelligence for melanoma screening: A prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Dec;38(12):2240-2249. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19905. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

  • Goessinger EV, Cerminara SE, Mueller AM, Gottfrois P, Huber S, Amaral M, Wenz F, Kostner L, Weiss L, Kunz M, Maul JT, Wespi S, Broman E, Kaufmann S, Patpanathapillai V, Treyer I, Navarini AA, Maul LV. Consistency of convolutional neural networks in dermoscopic melanoma recognition: A prospective real-world study about the pitfalls of augmented intelligence. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 May;38(5):945-953. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19777. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

  • Cerminara SE, Cheng P, Kostner L, Huber S, Kunz M, Maul JT, Bohm JS, Dettwiler CF, Geser A, Jakopovic C, Stoffel LM, Peter JK, Levesque M, Navarini AA, Maul LV. Diagnostic performance of augmented intelligence with 2D and 3D total body photography and convolutional neural networks in a high-risk population for melanoma under real-world conditions: A new era of skin cancer screening? Eur J Cancer. 2023 Sep;190:112954. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112954. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuroendocrine TumorsNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNevi and MelanomasSkin NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lara Valeska Maul, Dr. med.

    Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2020

First Posted

October 28, 2020

Study Start

January 25, 2021

Primary Completion

January 31, 2024

Study Completion

January 31, 2024

Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Locations