Conventional or High Definition tDCS to Enhance Implicit Motor Sequence Learning in Healthy Young Adults?
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Implicit motor sequence learning (IMSL) is a form of cognitive function that is known to be directly associated with motor function. This hallmark motor skill enables humans to perform multiple single movements in a specific sequential order and is involved in many of our daily activities (e.g. reaching, dressing, typing). One promising tool that has been shown to improve this type of learning in healthy young individuals, is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). This non-invasive brain stimulation technique entails the administration of a weak electrical current at the scalp between two electrodes. To date, studies have almost exclusively investigated effects of conventional tDCS. Recently, however, novel High Definition (HD) tDCS devices have been commercialised. Whereas conventional tDCS uses two rather large electrodes, likely including adjacent cortical areas in the stimulation, HD-tDCS uses multiple smaller electrodes, allowing for stimulation of the targeted cortical region with higher resolution/specificity. The aim of the present study is to confirm previous findings suggesting beneficial effects of conventional tDCS, delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy young adults. Additionally, the investigators will be the first to investigate potential effects of HD tDCS on IMSL in this population and to make a comparison between these two devices. The investigators will determine immediate effects that may occur concurrently with the application of tDCS but also short-term (five minutes post-tDCS) and long-term (one week post-tDCS) consolidation effects, as previous studies suggest that tDCS exerts its beneficial effects on IMSL in a consolidation phase rather than in an acquisition phase.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy
Started Oct 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2021
CompletedNovember 19, 2021
November 1, 2021
1 year
October 16, 2020
November 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sequence-Specific Learning Effect (during and following active tDCS)
In a typical SRT task, a target (e.g. black dot) is presented in one of four horizontal locations on a computer screen. Participants are asked to react to the target location by pressing a spatially compatible response key. Participants are not informed that the order of target locations follows a sequence predetermined by the experimenter. Participants are trained on the sequence in several blocks of trials, e.g.: 7 blocks of 100 trials. Typically, reaction times (RTs) decrease with practice, which is referred to as a general learning effect and constitutes the non-sequence-specific learning component of IMSL. Crucially, RTs increase when the sequence is inconspicuously replaced by a random sequence and decrease again when the predetermined sequence is reintroduced. The latter is referred to as the sequence-specific learning effect and is calculated by subtracting the mean RTs of the adjacent sequel blocks.
Changes in Sequence-Specific Learning Effect will be assessed between: (baseline) during active tDCS; (short-term) 5-minutes post active tDCS; (long-term) 1 week post active tDCS
Sequence-Specific Learning Effect (during and following sham tDCS)
In a typical SRT task, a target (e.g. black dot) is presented in one of four horizontal locations on a computer screen. Participants are asked to react to the target location by pressing a spatially compatible response key. Participants are not informed that the order of target locations follows a sequence predetermined by the experimenter. Participants are trained on the sequence in several blocks of trials, e.g.: 7 blocks of 100 trials. Typically, reaction times (RTs) decrease with practice, which is referred to as a general learning effect and constitutes the non-sequence-specific learning component of IMSL. Crucially, RTs increase when the sequence is inconspicuously replaced by a random sequence and decrease again when the predetermined sequence is reintroduced. The latter is referred to as the sequence-specific learning effect and is calculated by subtracting the mean RTs of the adjacent sequel blocks.
Changes in Sequence-Specific Learning Effect will be assessed between: (baseline) during sham tDCS; (short-term) 5-minutes post sham tDCS; (long-term) 1 week post sham tDCS
Secondary Outcomes (2)
General Learning Effect (during and following active tDCS)
Changes in General Learning Effect will be assessed between: (baseline) during active tDCS; (short-term) 5-minutes post active tDCS; (long-term) 1 week post active tDCS
General Learning Effect (during and following sham tDCS)
Changes in General Learning Effect will be assessed between: (baseline) during sham tDCS; (short-term) 5-minutes post sham tDCS; (long-term) 1 week post sham tDCS
Study Arms (4)
Group 1a - Conventional tDCS - Anodal first
EXPERIMENTALHalf of all subjects will receive Conventional tDCS (randomly assigned). Within this Conventional tDCS condition, half of the subjects will receive active (anodal, real) tDCS in the first session. Following cross-over and a three-week washout-period, this half of the subjects will receive sham (placebo) tDCS.
Group 1b - Conventional tDCS - Sham first
SHAM COMPARATORHalf of all subjects will receive Conventional tDCS (randomly assigned). Within this Conventional tDCS condition, half of the subjects will receive sham (placebo) tDCS in the first session. Following cross-over and a three-week washout-period, this half of the subjects will receive active (anodal, real) tDCS.
Group 2a - HD tDCS - Anodal first
EXPERIMENTALHalf of all subjects will receive High Definition (HD) tDCS (randomly assigned). Within this HD tDCS condition, half of the subjects will receive active (anodal, real) tDCS in the first session. Following cross-over and a three-week washout-period, this half of the subjects will receive sham (placebo) tDCS.
Group 2b - HD tDCS - Sham first
SHAM COMPARATORHalf of all subjects will receive High Definition (HD) tDCS (randomly assigned). Within this HD tDCS condition, half of the subjects will receive sham (placebo) tDCS in the first session. Following cross-over and a three-week washout-period, this half of the subjects will receive active (anodal, real) tDCS.
Interventions
tDCS will be delivered through a pair of identical square rubber electrodes (size 35 cm2), placed in rectangular saline-soaked sponges. For the stimulation of M1, electrodes will be placed over C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 EEG system, matching with the M1 contralateral to the performing dominant hand. The reference electrode will be positioned on F1 or F2, ipsilateral to the dominant hand. The current stimulation will be slowly ramped up from 0 mA to 2 mA in one minute. For the anodal tDCS condition, this intensity will be maintained for the duration of the SRT-task (approximately 20 minutes). This will result in a current density of 0,057 mA/cm2. For the sham tDCS condition - unbeknown to the subject - stimulation will be gradually decreased towards 0 mA immediately after the one-minute ramp-up. During the last block of the SRT-task, this gradual ramping-up and -down of the current stimulation will be repeated to optimize the process of blinding of participants.
HD tDCS will be delivered over M1. By connecting the conventional tDCS device (described above) to this "adapter", the direct current is delivered along the 4x1 HD tDCS configuration, allowing for more specific neuromodulation. Stimulation is delivered by means of one central gel-electrode and four return-electrodes placed in plastic encasings embedded in an EEG cap. Stimulation of left M1 (right hand = performing): delivered via the central electrode corresponding with C3 and held in place using a synthetic cap to hold the HD-tDCS electrodes on the head. Return-electrodes are positioned at Cz, F3, T7 and P3 (10-20 EEG system). Stimulation of right M1 (left hand = performing): central electrode will be positioned at C4 with the return-electrodes at Cz, F4, T8 and P4. Strategies for anodal and sham stimulation are identical to the ones described above (conventional tDCS).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- no history of neurological and/or recent musculoskeletal diseases that could hamper the execution of the SRT-task.
You may not qualify if:
- any of the following tDCS contra-indications: deep brain stimulator; pacemaker; head wound; skin condition of the scalp; a history of epilepsy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1050, Belgium
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kris Baetens, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Brain Body and Cognition Research Group
- STUDY CHAIR
Chris Baeken, PhD, MD
University Ghent
- STUDY CHAIR
Frank Van Overwalle, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Brain Body and Cognition Research Group
- STUDY CHAIR
Eva Swinnen, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Rehabilitation Research Group
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Natacha Deroost, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Brain Body and Cognition Research Group
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahyar Firouzi, MSc
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Brain Body and Cognition Research Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator (Doctoral Researcher)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2020
First Posted
October 23, 2020
Study Start
October 15, 2020
Primary Completion
October 15, 2021
Study Completion
November 15, 2021
Last Updated
November 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11