NCT04598880

Brief Summary

Background: Colorectal cancer is the most frequent neoplasm and the second cause of cancer death in Spain. Colon cleansing is critical for visualization of lesions at colonoscopy. High-quality cleansing allows for correct detection and resection of all lesions and may contribute to adequate risk stratification and follow-up interval. Low-volume laxatives improve tolerance of the colonoscopy preparation without reducing its effectiveness. Currently, the most widely used low-volume laxatives are one liter of Polyethylene glycol + ascorbate (PEG1A) and sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate (PSCM). The evidence on the comparison of laxatives to achieve a high-quality colonic cleansing is very scarce. Hypothesis: Polyethylene glycol 1 liter with ascorbate is superior to sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate in high-quality colon cleansing. Objective: Overall objective: To compare the global high-quality cleansing frequency between the two laxatives using the Harefield Scale (HS). The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in global high-quality cleansing of PEG1A compared to PSCM. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, superiority of PEG1A will be analyzed. Specific objectives:

  • Frequency of global high-quality cleansing using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
  • Frequency of adequate-quality cleansing using the HS and BBPS scales.
  • Tolerance and adverse effects of both laxatives.
  • Detection of lesions, total adenomas, advanced adenomas, total serrated lesions, advanced serrated lesions and colorectal cancer.
  • Detection of neoplastic lesions in the different colon segments (proximal, transverse, descending, sigmoid and rectum).
  • Association between detected lesions and the quality of the preparation, according to the HS and BBPS scales. Methods: Phase 4, multi-centric, randomized, single-blind (endoscopist), parallel study with two treatment arms: PEG1A (Pleinvue®) and PSCM (Citrafleet®).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,104

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

14 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 6, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Colonoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • High quality of entire colon cleansing according to the HS

    High quality cleansing in the entire colon (global) according to the HS, which is defined as all segments with a score of 3 or 4 points.

    At the time of colonoscopy

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • High quality of segmental colon cleansing according to the HS

    At the time of colonoscopy

  • Successful global and segmental colon cleansing according to the HS

    At the time of colonoscopy

  • High quality and adequate quality of global and segmental colon cleansing according to the BBPS

    At the time of colonoscopy

  • Demographic variables

    At the screening visit

  • Variables associated with inadequate colon cleansing

    At the screening visit

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Pleinvue

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects receive polyethylene glycol + ascorbate (PEG1A) as laxative treatment for colonoscopy preparation.

Drug: Polyethylene glycol + ascorbate

Citrafleet

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects receive sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate (PSCM) as laxative treatment for colonoscopy preparation.

Drug: Sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate

Interventions

Pleinvue® is administered orally in 2 doses (3 sachets) as per SmPC within the previous 18 hours to colonoscopy intervention. First dose is administered at 9 pm on the day before intervention (sachet 1: MACROGOL 3350 100 g + SODIUM SULFATE ANHYDROUS 9 g + SODIUM CHLORIDE 2 g + POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 1 g). Second dose is administered 5 hours before intervention and it is composed by 2 sachets (sachet A: MACROGOL 3350 40 g + SODIUM CHLORIDE 3,2 g + POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 1,2 g; sachet B: SODIUM ASCORBATE 48,11 g + ASCORBIC ACID 7,54 g).

Also known as: Pleinvue®, PEG1A
Pleinvue

Citrafleet® is administered orally in 2 doses (2 sachets) as per SmPC within the previous 18 hours to colonoscopy intervention. First dose (sachet 1) is administered at 9 pm on the day before intervention. Second dose (sachet 2) is administered 5 hours before intervention. Sachets 1 and 2 have the same composition: SODIUM PICOSULFATE 10 mg + MAGNESIUM OXIDE 3,5 g + CITRIC ACID 10,97 g.

Also known as: Citrafleet®, PSCM
Citrafleet

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Outpatients with previously scheduled colonoscopy with any indication: screening, follow-up, or symptoms.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age less than 18 years or more than 85 years
  • Hospital admission at the time of colonoscopy
  • Partial or total colectomy
  • Severe constipation
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease
  • Severe kidney or liver failure
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to understand the instructions by language barrier or cognitive disorder
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (14)

Hospital de Viladecans

Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Organización Sanitaria Integrada Araba

Alava, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital de Poniente

Almería, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, 08003, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Clínica Universidad de Navarra

Madrid, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital de la Princesa

Madrid, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital La Paz

Madrid, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Ramón y Cajal

Madrid, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Costa del Sol

Marbella, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Quirón

Málaga, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospital Santa Bárbara

Soria, Spain

NOT YET RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Diseases

Interventions

Polyethylene Glycolspicosulfate sodiummagnesium citrate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ethylene GlycolsGlycolsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Marco Antonio Alvarez González, MD, PhD

    Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eduardo Albéniz, MD, PhD

    Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (Pamplona, Spain)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Marco Antonio Alvarez González, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The assignment of each treatment will be displayed at the time of patient enrollment and will be open to the participant and the physician. The investigator who performs the colonoscopy and assesses the primary outcome (digestive endoscopist) is blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups with a 1:1 allocation using block sizes of 6 cases in each center.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2020

First Posted

October 22, 2020

Study Start

November 6, 2020

Primary Completion

May 1, 2021

Study Completion

May 1, 2021

Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations