NCT04595227

Brief Summary

To explore an effective diagnostic tool of glaucoma through the dynamic analysis of computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device (CPLRAD) pupillography based on iris recognition techniques and investigate its feasibility in glaucoma screening.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 30, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Maximum Constriction Velocity in One Eye in Different Groups

    The maximum constriction velocity will be calculated by the software

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Maximum Dilation Velocity in One Eye in Different Groups

    The maximum dilation velocity will be calculated by the software.

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Pupil Constriction Amplitude(ratio) in One Eye in Different Groups

    The pupil constriction amplitude(ratio) will be calculated by the software.

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Baseline Pupil Size in One Eye in Different Groups

    The baseline pupil size is measured before the stimulus on.

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Baseline Pupil Size(BPZ) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups

    Asymmetry is calculated by a formula: RAPD score of BPZ= 10 \* log10 (baseline pupil size in right eye/baseline pupil size in left eye)

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Maximum Constriction Velocity(MCV) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups

    Asymmetry is calculated by a formula: RAPD score of MCV= 10 \* log10 (maximum constriction velocity in right eye/maximum constriction velocity in left eye)

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Maximum Dilation Velocity(MDV) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups

    Asymmetry is calculated by a formula: RAPD score of MDV = 10 \* log10 (maximum dilation velocity in right eye/maximum dilation velocity in left eye)

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

  • Pupil Constriction Amplitude(ratio) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups

    Amplitude(ratio) is calculated by: (DIAMETER resting-DIAMETER constricted) / DIAMETER resting Asymmetry was calculated by a formula: RAPD score of Amplitude = 10 \* log10 (pupil constriction amplitude in right eye/pupil constriction amplitude in left eye)

    The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Study Arms (5)

Normal Subjects

Healthy eyes had intraocular pressure of less than 22 mmHg with no history of increased intraocular pressure and normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) results.

Device: Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

Suspect Glaucoma

Eyes with suspect glaucoma were defined as those with suspicious neuroretinal rim thinning or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects on masked stereophotographic assessment, without repeatable abnormal SAP results. Eyes with suspect glaucoma also included those with intraocular pressure (IOP) \> 21 mm Hg but with healthy-appearing optic discs and without repeatable abnormal SAP results

Device: Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, early stage

Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -0.01dB≤MD≤-6.00dB)

Device: Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, moderate stage

Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -6.01≤MD≤-12.00dB)

Device: Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, advanced stage

Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -12.00≤MD≤-20.00dB)

Device: Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

Interventions

CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.

Normal SubjectsPrimary Open Angle Glaucoma, advanced stagePrimary Open Angle Glaucoma, early stagePrimary Open Angle Glaucoma, moderate stageSuspect Glaucoma

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All participants are recruited from patients visiting at the Ophthalmologic Center of Peking University Third Hospital and from the general population through advertisements.

You may qualify if:

  • with open angles on gonioscopy
  • best-corrected visual acuity ≥0.5
  • spherical refraction within ±6.0 diopters (D), and cylinder correction within 3.0 D

You may not qualify if:

  • eyes with any evidence of physical abnormality of the iris or pupils on slit-lamp examination
  • eyes with a history of trauma or inflammation
  • undergone an intraocular surgery or laser within the previous 6 months /except uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • using systemic or topical medications that could affect pupil responses, including pilocarpine or atropine
  • presence of any media opacities that prevented good quality optical coherence tomography (OCT) or fundus images
  • presence of any retinal or neurological disease other than glaucoma abnormal ocular motility that prevents binocular fixation (eg, nystagmus, strabismus)
  • with severe system diseases or psychiatric disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking University Third Hosipital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-AngleOcular Hypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlaucomaEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Chun Zhang, MD/PhD

    Peking University Third Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Chun Zhang, MD/PhD

CONTACT

Di Zhang, Bachelor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2020

First Posted

October 20, 2020

Study Start

October 30, 2020

Primary Completion

April 30, 2021

Study Completion

October 1, 2021

Last Updated

May 7, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations